Re: (struts) 01/01: Merge pull request #958 from apache/dependabot/maven/commons-validator-commons-validator-1.9.0

Merge: 4267bf064 63fcf0f14 Author: Lukasz Lenart AuthorDate: Mon Jun 24 07:42:04 2024 +0200     Merge pull request #958 from apache/dependabot/maven/commons-validator-commons-validator-1.9.0         Bump commons-validator:commons-validator from 1.8.0 to 1.9.0 pom.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] closed pull request #173: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.2.3.Final to 8.0.0.Final

dependabot[bot] closed pull request #173: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.2.3.Final to 8.0.0.Final URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/173 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #173: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.2.3.Final to 8.0.0.Final

dependabot[bot] commented on PR #173: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/173#issuecomment-1277072957 Looks like org.hibernate.validator:hibernate-validator is no longer updatable, so this is no longer needed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service

[GitHub] [struts-examples] lukaszlenart commented on pull request #173: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.2.3.Final to 8.0.0.Final

lukaszlenart commented on PR #173: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/173#issuecomment-1277071667 @dependabot rebase -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] closed pull request #160: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.2.3.Final to 7.0.5.Final

dependabot[bot] closed pull request #160: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.2.3.Final to 7.0.5.Final URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/160 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #160: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.2.3.Final to 7.0.5.Final

dependabot[bot] commented on PR #160: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/160#issuecomment-1243077852 Superseded by #173. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the speci

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #173: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.2.3.Final to 8.0.0.Final

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #173: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/173 Bumps [hibernate-validator](https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator) from 6.2.3.Final to 8.0.0.Final. Changelog Sourced from https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #160: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.2.3.Final to 7.0.5.Final

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #160: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/160 Bumps [hibernate-validator](https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator) from 6.2.3.Final to 7.0.5.Final. Changelog Sourced from https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate

[GitHub] [struts-examples] lukaszlenart merged pull request #159: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.1.2.Final to 6.1.5.Final in /bean-validation

lukaszlenart merged PR #159: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/159 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@str

[GitHub] [struts-examples] lukaszlenart merged pull request #158: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.1.2.Final to 6.1.5.Final in /rest-angular

lukaszlenart merged PR #158: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/158 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@str

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #159: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.1.2.Final to 6.1.5.Final in /bean-validation

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #159: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/159 Bumps [hibernate-validator](https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator) from 6.1.2.Final to 6.1.5.Final. Changelog Sourced from https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #158: Bump hibernate-validator from 6.1.2.Final to 6.1.5.Final in /rest-angular

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #158: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/158 Bumps [hibernate-validator](https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate-validator) from 6.1.2.Final to 6.1.5.Final. Changelog Sourced from https://github.com/hibernate/hibernate

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] closed pull request #157: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.5.Final

dependabot[bot] closed pull request #157: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.5.Final URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/157 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #157: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.5.Final

dependabot[bot] commented on PR #157: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/157#issuecomment-1207899395 Looks like org.hibernate:hibernate-validator is no longer a dependency, so this is no longer needed. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To

[GitHub] [struts-examples] lukaszlenart commented on pull request #157: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.5.Final

lukaszlenart commented on PR #157: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/157#issuecomment-1207890564 @dependabot rebase -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

[GitHub] [struts-examples] lukaszlenart commented on pull request #157: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.5.Final

lukaszlenart commented on PR #157: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/157#issuecomment-1207859832 @dependabot rebase -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #157: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.5.Final

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #157: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/157 Bumps hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.5.Final. [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency

[GitHub] [struts] lukaszlenart merged pull request #583: WW-5208 Update hibernate-validator to 6.2.4

lukaszlenart merged PR #583: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/583 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

[GitHub] [struts] sepe81 opened a new pull request, #583: WW-5208 Update hibernate-validator to 6.2.4

sepe81 opened a new pull request, #583: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/583 b/c 6.1 has reached its end-of-life according to https://hibernate.org/validator/releases/6.1/ 6.2 is compatible with the given Java and Jakarta versions and supports `javax.validation

[GitHub] [struts-examples] lukaszlenart closed pull request #137: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.4.Final

lukaszlenart closed pull request #137: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.4.Final URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/137 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #137: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.4.Final

dependabot[bot] commented on PR #137: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/137#issuecomment-1134188815 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you'd rather skip all updates until the next major or minor versio

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] closed pull request #124: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.2.Final

dependabot[bot] closed pull request #124: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.2.Final URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/124 -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #124: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.2.Final

dependabot[bot] commented on PR #124: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/124#issuecomment-1134028821 Superseded by #137. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the speci

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #137: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.4.Final

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #137: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/137 Bumps hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.4.Final. [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #124: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.2.Final

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #124: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/124 Bumps hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.2.Final. [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #65: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.1.Final

dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #65: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/65#issuecomment-774913285 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll

[GitHub] [struts-examples] lukaszlenart closed pull request #65: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.1.Final

lukaszlenart closed pull request #65: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/65 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #65: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.1.Final

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #65: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/65 Bumps hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.1.Final. [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #48: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.0.Final

dependabot[bot] commented on pull request #48: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/48#issuecomment-751601882 OK, I won't notify you again about this release, but will get in touch when a new version is available. If you change your mind, just re-open this PR and I'll

[GitHub] [struts-examples] lukaszlenart closed pull request #48: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.0.Final

lukaszlenart closed pull request #48: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/48 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above

[GitHub] [struts-examples] dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #48: Bump hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.0.Final

dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request #48: URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-examples/pull/48 Bumps hibernate-validator from 4.3.2.Final to 7.0.0.Final. [![Dependabot compatibility score](https://dependabot-badges.githubapp.com/badges/compatibility_score?dependency-name

Re: Changes on the validator field-validator required

t; wrote: > > > > On 2/23/2018 2:40 PM, Greg Huber wrote: > We use validator to make sure null is > not passed, but if I use a double it does not now validate, it wants a > Double for it to work. > > Has there been any changes, or has it always been like this? > &

Re: Changes on the validator field-validator required

Zamani wrote: On 2/23/2018 2:40 PM, Greg Huber wrote: We use validator to make sure null is not passed, but if I use a double it does not now validate, it wants a Double for it to work. Has there been any changes, or has it always been like this? Did you mean it works in some versions

Re: Changes on the validator field-validator required

primitives. Cheers Greg Cheers Greg On 23 February 2018 at 12:51, Yasser Zamani wrote: > > > On 2/23/2018 2:40 PM, Greg Huber wrote: > > We use validator to make sure null is > > not passed, but if I use a double it does not now validate, it wants a > > Double

Re: Changes on the validator field-validator required

On 2/23/2018 2:40 PM, Greg Huber wrote: > We use validator to make sure null is > not passed, but if I use a double it does not now validate, it wants a > Double for it to work. > > Has there been any changes, or has it always been like this? Did you mean it works in some

Changes on the validator field-validator required

We use validator to make sure null is not passed, but if I use a double it does not now validate, it wants a Double for it to work. Has there been any changes, or has it always been like this? also, other validators work ie the min/max below, with the double. unspecified

[GitHub] struts pull request #130: WW-3952: Credit card validator

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/130 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab

[GitHub] struts issue #130: WW-3952: Credit card validator

Github user gregh3269 commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/130 Last time I did some credit card validation, I needed to use a java script version as the payment process obscured the field names by not having the "name" attribute (so it was not obvious when the

[GitHub] struts issue #130: WW-3952: Credit card validator

Github user cnenning commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/130 If patterns change users have another reason to upgrade to latest struts 😆 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If you

[GitHub] struts issue #130: WW-3952: Credit card validator

Github user lukaszlenart commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/130 Good question... I have used those random card numbers in tests and looks ok (but we will see) https://www.paypalobjects.com/en_US/vhelp/paypalmanager_help/credit_card_numbers.htm --- If your

[GitHub] struts issue #130: WW-3952: Credit card validator

Github user cnenning commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/130 How often do credit card companies change their number-patterns in a way that the regex needs to be updated? 'guess it is rare enough. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em

[GitHub] struts issue #130: WW-3952: Credit card validator

Github user lukaszlenart commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/130 > I hope the regex is stable What do you mean by that? I have used this http://www.regular-expressions.info/creditcard.html --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this

[GitHub] struts issue #130: WW-3952: Credit card validator

Github user cnenning commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/130 I hope the regex is stable 😉 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled an

[GitHub] struts issue #130: WW-3952: Credit card validator

Github user lukaszlenart commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/130 This is ready for review --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wi

[GitHub] struts pull request #130: WW-3952: Credit card validator

GitHub user lukaszlenart opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/130 WW-3952: Credit card validator Implements a credit card validator [WW-3952](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-3952) You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4346 - Nested visitor validator returns wr...

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/13 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabl

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4346 - Nested visitor validator returns wr...

GitHub user aleksandr-m opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/13 WW-4346 - Nested visitor validator returns wrong full field name get correct full field name in visitor field validator You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running

Re: Validator and parse param

2012/10/11 Lukasz Lenart : > I'm working on [1] and I've noticed that the ValidatorSupport class > already contains undocumented method conditionalParse(String). I've > used it to parse min/max values in Int validator [2] but it must be > enabled by specifying parse para

Validator and parse param

Hi all! I'm working on [1] and I've noticed that the ValidatorSupport class already contains undocumented method conditionalParse(String). I've used it to parse min/max values in Int validator [2] but it must be enabled by specifying parse param. I'm wondering if we need

Re: [jira] [Commented] (WW-3727) com/opensymphony/xwork2/validator/default.xml uses old DTD

d=13173257#comment-13173257 > ] > > Lukasz Lenart commented on WW-3727: > --- > > Can we close this ? > >> com/opensymphony/xwork2/validator/default.xml uses old DTD >> --

Re: BigDecimal Validator

Developers List Date: 18-01-2011 23:36 Subject: Re: BigDecimal Validator Still with big decimal. If the converter fails (which is does if, say, there's whitespace) it's still a validation error. I'm assuming most people either write their own, or do it manually, or just never deal

Re: BigDecimal Validator

Still with big decimal. If the converter fails (which is does if, say, there's whitespace) it's still a validation error. I'm assuming most people either write their own, or do it manually, or just never deal with money. (I still deal with floating point or money numbers only rarely, to be honest,

Re: BigDecimal Validator

> Hmm, I guess there's just a converter. Dave, you're right, nothing more than a silly converter :) . > I guess nobody uses BigDecimals. How do they represent monetary amounts ? -- Maurizio Cucchiara - To unsubscribe, e-mail: d

Re: BigDecimal Validator

Hmm, I guess there's just a converter. I guess nobody uses BigDecimals. Dave On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:51 AM, Maurizio Cucchiara < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi guys, > I'm wondering why there is no bundled BigDecimal validator, is there a > specific

BigDecimal Validator

Hi guys, I'm wondering why there is no bundled BigDecimal validator, is there a specific reason? I wrote it from scratch, I could bundle it into the xwork-core. -- Maurizio Cucchiara - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-uns

Re: problem with regex validator

Hi friends, any clue? Srikanth VSGoud wrote: > > Hi Friends, > I am using struts 2.1.6. Facing problem with error messages. > When i use 'regex' validator in validation.xml file than > 1. when i clicked on submit button for the first time. >

problem with regex validator

Hi Friends, I am using struts 2.1.6. Facing problem with error messages. When i use 'regex' validator in validation.xml file than 1. when i clicked on submit button for the first time. It is showing error messages like Customer name i

Re: Struts Email Validator

ng to RFC 2822. > > On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 10:00 PM, pradeep parvathipuram > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I have a quick question about the email validator that comes with > struts 2.x. I saw the regular expression that it is using is > > > &

Re: Struts Email Validator

2008 at 10:00 PM, pradeep parvathipuram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I have a quick question about the email validator that comes with struts > 2.x. I saw the regular expression that it is using is > > > \\b(^[_A-Za-z0-9-](\\.[_A-Za-z0-9-])*@([A-Za-z0-9-

Struts Email Validator

Hello, I have a quick question about the email validator that comes with struts 2.x. I saw the regular expression that it is using is \\b(^[_A-Za-z0-9-](\\.[_A-Za-z0-9-])*@([A-Za-z0-9-])+((\\.com)|(\\.net)|(\\.org)|(\\.info)|(\\.edu)|(\\.mil)|(\\.gov)|(\\.biz)|(\\.ws)|(\\.us)|(\\.tv)|(\\.cc

Re: svn commit: r569926 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src: main/java/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen/ test/java/org/apache/struts/validator/

2007/9/11, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Oh, the .g file is pure human. :-) In this case I agree with Niall :-) Antonio

Re: svn commit: r569926 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src: main/java/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen/ test/java/org/apache/struts/validator/

Oh, the .g file is pure human. :-) On 9/11/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2007/9/11, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > I really dislike changes where as well as the bug/enhancement > > modifications there are also a mass of style/formatting changes - > > makes it re

Re: svn commit: r569926 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src: main/java/org/apache/struts/validator/validwhen/ test/java/org/apache/struts/validator/

2007/9/11, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I really dislike changes where as well as the bug/enhancement > modifications there are also a mass of style/formatting changes - > makes it really difficult to pick out the actual changes from the > noise in ValidWhenParser.g I suppose that th

Re: svn commit: r552390 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts/validator: FieldChecks.java LocalStrings.properties

Niall Pemberton wrote: I agree that hiding the errors (e.g. someone mis-typing a field name in their XML) was/is bad and I'm sure causes alot of grief - and with the Validator changes, no reason to not do this - which is why when I commented I didn't object to the change. What is im

Re: svn commit: r552390 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts/validator: FieldChecks.java LocalStrings.properties

ion to then succeed opens up an unpredictable situation for the application developer, which I think would be very worrisome. If data must always be valid, then failing to access that data cannot be considered a success. Prior to Validator 1.2.0 I don't think it was that un-common - since Actio

Re: svn commit: r552390 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts/validator: FieldChecks.java LocalStrings.properties

I do not take this situation or change lightly, and IMO is a hole necessary for patching. If you weren't logging an error already in Commons Validator, there would be no disagreement from me; but because it is clearly an error condition, it's an error that must also stop the use case.

Re: svn commit: r552390 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts/validator: FieldChecks.java LocalStrings.properties

Good point. Niall Pemberton wrote: STR-2611 just requested more info in the logged error message - but this change goes further because in all cases except the required validator validation will now fail if an exception is throw accessing the property's value - whereas before it just sk

Re: svn commit: r552390 - in /struts/struts1/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts/validator: FieldChecks.java LocalStrings.properties

STR-2611 just requested more info in the logged error message - but this change goes further because in all cases except the required validator validation will now fail if an exception is throw accessing the property's value - whereas before it just skipped validation. For anyone that has r

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33087] - RFE: validator against cross-site scripting

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Using Struts Validator framework

Hi, I am using Struts Validator framework and DynaActionForm for performing form data validations. The user input is taken and then corresponding record is fetched from the database. Depending on the query result, I need to display appropriate message to the user. How can I achieve this ? It

Re: Commons Validator 1.3.1: Missing Checksum

On 12/3/06, Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll follow up with repository@ to see why the checksum wasn't synced > to the central repo with the jar. Thanks Wendy Carlos fixed it last night. (Something isn't quite right with the scripts that do the m1 -> m2 repository sync.) --

Re: Commons Validator 1.3.1: Missing Checksum

On 12/4/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 12/3/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I compile, I get this from Maven: > > 8K downloaded > [WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for > commons-validator/commons-valida

Re: Commons Validator 1.3.1: Missing Checksum

On 12/3/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When I compile, I get this from Maven: 8K downloaded [WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for commons-validator/commons-validator/1.3.1/commons-validator-1.3.1.pom - I don't see the checksum in the M2

Re: Commons Validator 1.3.1: Missing Checksum

On 12/4/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: When I compile, I get this from Maven: 8K downloaded [WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for commons-validator/commons-validator/1.3.1/commons-validator-1.3.1.pom - I don't see the checksum in the M2

Commons Validator 1.3.1: Missing Checksum

When I compile, I get this from Maven: 8K downloaded [WARNING] *** CHECKSUM FAILED - Error retrieving checksum file for commons-validator/commons-validator/1.3.1/commons-validator-1.3.1.pom - I don't see the checksum in the M2 Repo: http://mirrors.ibiblio.org/pub/mirrors/maven2/co

Re: Struts Validator - Generating Illegal HTML

The javascript is part of Commons Validator - not Struts. If you create an issue ticket against Commons Validator I'll take the the html markup out of the javascript comments. http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/issue-tracking.html Niall On 11/22/06, Neil Sherman/Trapsoft Inc &l

Struts Validator - Generating Illegal HTML

Hi All, I am currently using the struts validator (Struts 1.2.9) to create some client side validation code for one of my JSP pages. The problem I have is that some of the JavaScript it creates includes some JavaDoc comments such as: /*$RCSfile: validateMaxLength.js,v $ $Rev: 376673

Re: New validator to date

ignacio83 ha scritto: Hi all. Its is my First message in list... Well... wrong list :-) Write to Struts Users mailing list: http://struts.apache.org/mail.html Ciao Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a

New validator to date

Hi all. Its is my First message in list... I am build a validator to date called dateRestriction See example: datePatternStrict dd/MM/ min 10/10/2006 max today Can be util? Thanks André - To unsubscribe, e

Re: change the presentation of struts validator framework errors on jsp page?

This is really a discussion for the Struts Users list, rather than the dev list; please follow up with any further questions there. However, in brief, there is currently no support for displaying client-side validation errors as in-line HTML like you show server-side validation errors. Simply

RE: change the presentation of struts validator framework errors on jsp page?

--- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/change-the-presentation-of-struts-validator-framework-errors-on-jsp-page--tf2563096.html#a7145082 Se

RE: change the presentation of struts validator framework errors on jsp page?

User list. > I would like to know if there is any way to change the presentation of > struts validators framework errors. http://struts.apache.org/1.2.x/userGuide/struts-html.html#errors Dave - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PR

change the presentation of struts validator framework errors on jsp page?

. Regards, Sarry http://www.jguru.com/forums/view.jsp?EID=1318059 http://www.jguru.com/forums/view.jsp?EID=1318059 -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/change-the-presentation-of-struts-validator-framework-errors-on-jsp-page--tf2563096.html#a7143718 Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing

Re: [jira] Created: (STR-2964) Struts automatic Validator issue ( Cannot load a validator resource from '/org/apache/struts/validator/validator-rules.xml, /WEB-INF/validation.xml')

Hi, I'm having the same bug in Tomcat 5.5 (run inside Eclipse 3.2.1 with wtp 1.5 and java2SDK 1.5) Only '/org/apache/struts/validator/validator-rules.xml' - OK, pass Only '/WEB-INF/validation.xml' - Error, not pass ===Tomcat log 01/11/2006 14:27:32 org.apache.coyote

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39020] - Validator validwhen :Cannot make dependance between two different index in an Array

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 39020] - Validator validwhen :Cannot make dependance between two different index in an Array

ve run into the same issue. Is there any other way to configure the validator to do this kind of check, at least until this bug gets fixed? -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee f

Problem in Mask Rule of Struts Validator for Different Languages

Hi , I am using Struts validator and mask rule for Validating my Fields like : mask ^\w+$ minlength

Re: Question about Struts validator

On 6/26/06, mosho <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I want to validate a form ... Please post your question on the user list. See: http://struts.apache.org/mail.html Or, since your message footer indicates that you're using Nabble: http://www.nabble.com/Struts---User-f206.html -- Wendy ---

Question about Struts validator

Hi All, I want to validate a form by using struts validator, it is working fine. It validates the form if click submit button, and it also validates the form if I pass it as a url for example: http://111.22.80.244:8989/eNOI/test.do I want to validate the form only if I hit submit button not by

[jira] Resolved: (STR-2800) Cannot load a validator resource

Tomcat installation? I'm pretty sure that code works as I just tested it as part of the 1.3.2 release, but I could have missed something :) Feel free to reopen if you can replicate it in Tomcat. Thanks. > Cannot load a validator resource > >

[jira] Resolved: (STR-2724) Fix Min/Max Length Validator for different line endings

with it. Thanks. > Fix Min/Max Length Validator for different line endings > --- > > Key: STR-2724 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2724 > Project: Struts Action 1 > Type: Bug

svn commit: r397767 - /struts/action/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts/validator/FieldChecks.java

Author: mrdon Date: Thu Apr 27 22:34:08 2006 New Revision: 397767 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=397767&view=rev Log: Adding better string length handling STR-2724 Modified: struts/action/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts/validator/FieldChecks.java Modified: struts/ac

[jira] Moved: (SHALE-144) [shale] Default validator configuration should include rules

: (was: Nightly Build) Assign To: (was: Struts Developer Mailing List) > [shale] Default validator configuration should include rules > > > Key: SHALE-144 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/b

[jira] Moved: (SHALE-79) [shale] Validator deprecations

: (was: Nightly Build) Assign To: (was: Struts Developer Mailing List) > [shale] Validator deprecations > -- > > Key: SHALE-79 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-79 > Project: Shale > Type: Bug >

[jira] Moved: (SHALE-36) [Shale] Implement use of Commons Validator Javascript

: (was: 1.0.2) Assign To: (was: Struts Developer Mailing List) > [Shale] Implement use of Commons Validator Javascript > - > > Key: SHALE-36 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/SHALE-36 >

[jira] Moved: (SHALE-37) [Shale] Commons validator ignores the immediate attribute when using client side validation

: (was: Nightly Build) Assign To: (was: Struts Developer Mailing List) > [Shale] Commons validator ignores the immediate attribute when using client > side validation > --- > >

[jira] Closed: (STR-1574) [validator] numeric validations should use locales

[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-1574?page=all ] Don Brown closed STR-1574: -- Resolution: Fixed > [validator] numeric validations should use locales > -- > > Key: STR-1574 &g

[jira] Reopened: (STR-1574) [validator] numeric validations should use locales

[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-1574?page=all ] Don Brown reopened STR-1574: Assign To: (was: Struts Developer Mailing List) > [validator] numeric validations should use loca

[jira] Closed: (STR-771) [validator-rules.xml] javascript validateRequired() function does not work with radio objects

[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-771?page=all ] Don Brown closed STR-771: - Resolution: Fixed > [validator-rules.xml] javascript validateRequired() function does not work > with radio o

[jira] Reopened: (STR-771) [validator-rules.xml] javascript validateRequired() function does not work with radio objects

[ http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-771?page=all ] Don Brown reopened STR-771: --- Assign To: (was: Struts Developer Mailing List) > [validator-rules.xml] javascript validateRequired() function does not work > with radio o

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >