Does anybody have anything about removing the validation code from the
workflow interceptor?
This could potentially break compatibility for users that are
exploiting this "feature" and do not have the validation interceptor
on their stack.
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-207
, represents
> that same line of thought.
>
> I'll ask Bob to comment on what his thoughts are around this.
>
> Patrick
>
> > Hello all,
> >
> > On this page:
> > http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease200
> >
> > There is, under
ding a reference to the
validation/workflow issues brought up on this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots?action=show
Under the main list, item number 16, and under Patrick's list, item
number 4 and 5, there is discussion of the default workflow and its
relation to the idea of view
ase200
>
> There is, under the new features heading a reference
> to the
> validation/workflow issues brought up on this page:
> http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots?action=show
>
> Under the main list, item number 16, and under
> Patrick's list, item
> number
Hello all,
On this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsActionRelease200
There is, under the new features heading a reference to the
validation/workflow issues brought up on this page:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/RoughSpots?action=show
Under the main list, item number 16, and under
-Original Message-
> From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 1:27 PM
> To: Struts Developers List
> Subject: Re: turning off workflow logs
>
> Sure, go for it.
>
> http://www.livinglogic.de/Struts/
>
>
>
> --
> Jam
I looked all over that site and couldn't find out how...
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 08, 2006 1:27 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: turning off workflow logs
Sure, go for it.
http://www.livinglogic.de/S
ect: turning off workflow logs
Hi there-
Can I turn off the workflow logs?
Eg:
<00>
<[com.livinglogic.struts.workflow.WorkflowRequestProcessorLogic]
Processing
a 'POST' for path '/enrollment/OrderInfo'>
<00>
<[com.livinglogic.struts.
Hi there-
Can I turn off the workflow logs?
Eg:
<00>
<[com.livinglogic.struts.workflow.WorkflowRequestProcessorLogic] Processing
a 'POST' for path '/enrollment/OrderInfo'>
<00>
<[com.livinglogic.struts.workflow.Workflo
On Fri, 31 Dec 2004 14:49:40 -0500, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > and I also saw one workflow engine
> > at Jakarta:
> >
> > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/workflow/
>
> I had seen this one, but my impression was that it was not under
> and I also saw one workflow engine
> at Jakarta:
>
> http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/workflow/
I had seen this one, but my impression was that it was not under
active development. Nobody seems to respond on the commons-dev
emailing list
and I also saw one workflow engine
at Jakarta:
http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/workflow/
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: Dakota Jack [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 31, 2004 8:21 AM
> To: Struts Developers List; Michael Rasmussen
> Sub
I would be interested, always, in looking at code, Sean.
Jack
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:47:04 -0500, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have developed a basic workflow engine that I have found to be
> extremely useful in my current Struts applications. I developed it
>
This one is super, Michael. Thanks!
Jack
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:54:16 -0600, Michael Rasmussen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to add to the list of general tools out there for workflow I
> think this one is fairly nice, though I haven't really used it
> extensively.
Just to add to the list of general tools out there for workflow I
think this one is fairly nice, though I haven't really used it
extensively...works with JSF too Craig
http://wfnm.sourceforge.net
Michael
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:25:52 -0800, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
&
, Sean Schofield wrote:
> I have developed a basic workflow engine that I have found to be
> extremely useful in my current Struts applications. I developed it
> after finding shortcomings in the open source workflow stuff that
> was available at the time.
>
> I know Craig mention
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:18:54 -0800, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:47:04 -0500, Sean Schofield
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have developed a basic workflow engine that I have found to be
> > extremely useful in my c
> I'd be interested in seeing what you've come up with.
Most likely you will not be able to use much of it (for your specific
itch) but you never know. I might have come up with some general
concepts that you could find useful. I will send it to you once I'm
done refactoring (I'm rewriting my fa
On Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:47:04 -0500, Sean Schofield
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have developed a basic workflow engine that I have found to be
> extremely useful in my current Struts applications. I developed it
> after finding shortcomings in the open source workflow stuff that
I have developed a basic workflow engine that I have found to be
extremely useful in my current Struts applications. I developed it
after finding shortcomings in the open source workflow stuff that was
available at the time.
I know Craig mentioned a possible need for workflow stuff for Shale
At 2:09 PM -0500 11/17/04, Vijay K Dasari wrote:
Hi,
We are looking for a FrameWork or a Design Pattern to support the Flow among
Sturts Actions (WorkFlow). I found a proposal from STRUTS at
http://struts.apache.org/proposals/workflow.html
which looks promosing. But this document says that this
Hi,
We are looking for a FrameWork or a Design Pattern to support the Flow among
Sturts Actions (WorkFlow). I found a proposal from STRUTS at
http://struts.apache.org/proposals/workflow.html
which looks promosing. But this document says that this work is stalled. And
they suggested in looking at
22 matches
Mail list logo
