--- Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I sound a little irked about this, it's because I am ... it turns
> out that the generted JavaScript function names for Commons Validator
> 1.1.3 (included with Struts 1.2.x) are different than the generated
> names in the version of Valida
day, October 24, 2004 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: XHTML Form Tag
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:57:20 -0500, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hola Amigos!
AFAICT this is an issue only in the html:form tag. If we were to
introduce something to trigger XHTML 1.1, couldn't we just "lie" to
On Sun, 24 Oct 2004 21:57:20 -0500, Eddie Bush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hola Amigos!
>
> AFAICT this is an issue only in the html:form tag. If we were to introduce
> something to trigger XHTML 1.1, couldn't we just "lie" to validator about the "name"
> by telling it the ID instead of the na
Hola Amigos!
AFAICT this is an issue only in the html:form tag. If we were to introduce something
to trigger XHTML 1.1, couldn't we just "lie" to validator about the "name" by telling
it the ID instead of the name? Would the resulting syntax emitted by validator still
be ok?
Perhaps we shoul
