Re: dependancy on 1.5.0 tools

2008-05-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
gt; > To: "Struts Developers List" > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:07 AM > Subject: Re: dependancy on 1.5.0 tools > > > > > > > 2008/5/12 Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > > so should we bump this to 6.0, or if we don't actually ne

Re: dependancy on 1.5.0 tools

2008-05-12 Thread Al Sutton
Done : https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-2643 - Original Message - From: "Antonio Petrelli" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 8:07 AM Subject: Re: dependancy on 1.5.0 tools 2008/5/12 Al Sutton <[EMAIL P

Re: dependancy on 1.5.0 tools

2008-05-12 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2008/5/12 Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > so should we bump this to 6.0, or if we don't actually need tools.jar maybe > remove it? I think that we can remove it, I really cannot see the need for such a dependency. Eventually, the only dependency we need is the runtime library, if we want to be J

dependancy on 1.5.0 tools

2008-05-12 Thread Al Sutton
I've just been looking through the core pom.xml in HEAD and noticed this; default-tools.jar java.vendor Sun Microsystems Inc. c