html:image this.that.x=4 and this.that.y=9 translations in ActionForm

2004-08-10 Thread Michael McGrady
How do the values for the name attribute of the image html tag get translated from this.that.x to [actionForm].getThis().getThat().setX(Integer)? I would like, rather, to thave the values read as follows: [actionForm].setName(this.that). So, I need to find the code which needs to be massaged.

Re: html:image this.that.x=4 and this.that.y=9 translations in ActionForm

2004-08-10 Thread Hubert Rabago
I believe this code is in the RequestProcess.processPopulate(), which in turn calls BeanUtils.populate(). Hubert --- Michael McGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How do the values for the name attribute of the image html tag get translated from this.that.x to

Re: html:image this.that.x=4 and this.that.y=9 translations in ActionForm

2004-08-10 Thread Hubert Rabago
I meant to say RequestProcessor.processPopulate(), which in turn calls BeanUtils.populate(). extra There's some really cool code in there (BeanUtils) by the way. Makes we want to play with MessageResources so I don't have to say invalid.combination={0} is not a valid plan for {1} but

Re: html:image this.that.x=4 and this.that.y=9 translations in ActionForm

2004-08-10 Thread Niall Pemberton
that start org.apache.struts. recently to resolve this - try it with the nightly build. Niall - Original Message - From: Michael McGrady [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:37 PM Subject: Re: html:image this.that.x=4 and this.that.y=9

Re: html:image this.that.x=4 and this.that.y=9 translations in ActionForm

2004-08-10 Thread Niall Pemberton
5:16 PM Subject: Re: html:image this.that.x=4 and this.that.y=9 translations in ActionForm At 08:53 AM 8/10/2004, you wrote: Have you tried this with the latest nightly build - I was having similar problems with some of the standard parameters struts uses (e.g. Cancel button indicator

Re: html:image this.that.x=4 and this.that.y=9 translations in ActionForm

2004-08-10 Thread Michael McGrady
At 08:43 PM 8/10/2004, you wrote: Michael, Sorry its not something thats an issue for me at the moment and so its not high on my priorities to spend time giving some thought to. Niall Niall, I have come to think that this is not important enough to do, since I have found the following simple