Re: struts/xwork patch submission. Please Review.

2007-10-04 Thread Don Brown
t; I suggest that the following three lines be removed from > >> DefaultActionInvocation.java, line 174: > >> > >> if (result != null) { > >> return result; > >> } > >> > >> I've tested this and I get the desired b

Re: struts/xwork patch submission. Please Review.

2007-10-03 Thread MassimoH
build reports no additional >> automated test failures. I got four test failures trying to build the >> standard xwork 2.0.4 distribution before making any changes, however my >> code change didn't affect these results. >> >> >> Version Info >> Java 1.6.0_02 >> Struts 2.0.9 >> xwork 2.0.4 >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/struts-xwork-patch-submission.-Please-Review.-tf4558415.html#a13020278 Sent from the Struts - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: struts/xwork patch submission. Please Review.

2007-10-03 Thread Aymeric Levaux
standard xwork 2.0.4 distribution before making any changes, however my > code change didn't affect these results. > > > Version Info > Java 1.6.0_02 > Struts 2.0.9 > xwork 2.0.4 > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/struts-xwork-patch-submission.-Pl

Re: struts/xwork patch submission. Please Review.

2007-10-02 Thread Don Brown
or the original exception. The xwork build reports no additional > automated test failures. I got four test failures trying to build the > standard xwork 2.0.4 distribution before making any changes, however my code > change didn't affect these results. > > > Version Info > J

struts/xwork patch submission. Please Review.

2007-10-02 Thread MassimoH
n. The xwork build reports no additional automated test failures. I got four test failures trying to build the standard xwork 2.0.4 distribution before making any changes, however my code change didn't affect these results. Version Info Java 1.6.0_02 Struts 2.0.9 xwork 2.0.4 -- View this m