Vote passed with result:
+1 binding x3
Cheers
Lukasz
sob., 28 cze 2025 o 16:24 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact.
> This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK.
> All the changes:
> https://github.co
sob., 28 cze 2025 o 16:24 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Cheers
Łukasz
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache
+1 (binding)
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] General Availability (GA)
#
web: https://www.jgeppert.com
Am Sa., 28. Juni 2025 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Lukasz Lenart <
lukaszlen...@apache.org>:
> The Struts Annotations 2.0 t
+1 GA
On Sun, 29 Jun 2025 at 00:24, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact.
> This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK.
> All the changes:
> https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/releases/tag/STRUTS_
The Struts Annotations 2.0 test build is now available as a Maven artifact.
This version uses Java 17 as a minimal version of JDK.
All the changes:
https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/releases/tag/STRUTS_ANNOTATIONS_2_0
Staging artifacts are available here:
https://repository.apache.org
jogep opened a new pull request, #3:
URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/pull/3
(no comment)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe
lukaszlenart merged PR #633:
URL: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/633
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apach
lukaszlenart opened a new pull request, #633:
URL: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/633
Closes [WW-5258](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-5258)
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
pt., 4 lis 2022 o 06:53 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> niedz., 30 paź 2022 o 10:52 Lukasz Lenart
> napisał(a):
> >
> > pt., 21 paź 2022 o 11:11 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> > > [ ] Leave at test build
> > > [ ] Alpha
> > > [ ] Beta
> > > [X] General Availability (GA)
> >
> > +1 (binding)
>
> If n
niedz., 30 paź 2022 o 10:52 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> pt., 21 paź 2022 o 11:11 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> > [ ] Leave at test build
> > [ ] Alpha
> > [ ] Beta
> > [X] General Availability (GA)
>
> +1 (binding)
If no objections this vote will be accepted by a lasus consensus within 24h
Reg
pt., 21 paź 2022 o 11:11 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e
The Struts Annotations 1.0.8 test build is now available as a Maven artifact.
This version contains an upgraded Freemarker version and replaces
obsolete HTML attributes with dedicated CSS classes.
To test this version you can upgrade Struts Annotations in the Struts
project and build the project
The build for Struts/Struts Annotations/master completed successfully and is
back to normal.
Build:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Struts/job/Struts%20Annotations/job/master/50/
Logs:
https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Struts/job/Struts%20Annotations/job/master/50/console
Changes:
https://ci
lukaszlenart merged PR #2:
URL: https://github.com/apache/struts-annotations/pull/2
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
BUILD-STABLE: Job 'Struts/Struts Annotations/PR-2 [PR-2] [2]':
Is back to normal.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
BUILD-STABLE: Job 'Struts/Struts Annotations/master [master] [3]':
Is back to normal.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-m
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'Struts/Struts Annotations/master [master] [2]':
Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Struts/job/Struts%20Annotations/job/master/2/";>Struts/Struts
Annotat
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'Struts/Struts Annotations/master [master] [1]':
Check console output at "https://ci-builds.apache.org/job/Struts/job/Struts%20Annotations/job/master/1/";>Struts/Struts
Annotat
+1
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] General Availability (GA)
Best Regards
Johannes
Lukasz Lenart schrieb am Mo., 17. Feb. 2020,
21:19:
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.7 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact.
>
> This version splits generation of Struts ta
Vote passed with result:
+1 (binding) x3
Thanks a lot!
Lukasz
pon., 17 lut 2020 o 21:19 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
>
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.7 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact.
>
> This version splits generation of Struts tags info into a file with
> desc
>> [ ] Leave at test build
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding), thanks!
Regards.
>-Original Message-
>From: Lukasz Lenart
>Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2020 10:31 PM
>To: Struts Developers List
>Subject: Re:
pon., 17 lut 2020 o 21:19 Lukasz Lenart napisał(a):
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe,
Annotations 1.0.7
The Struts Annotations 1.0.7 test build is now available as a Maven
artifact.
This version splits generation of Struts tags info into a file with
description and a file with attributes - this will allow include those
files during site generation.
To test this version you can upgrade
The Struts Annotations 1.0.7 test build is now available as a Maven
artifact.
This version splits generation of Struts tags info into a file with
description and a file with attributes - this will allow include those
files during site generation.
To test this version you can upgrade Struts
BUILD-STABLE: Job 'struts-annotations/master [master] [4]':
Is back to normal.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'struts-annotations/master [master] [3]':
Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/struts-annotations/job/master/3/";>struts-annotations/master
[master] [3]"
BUILD-FAILURE: Job 'struts-annotations/master [master] [2]':
Check console output at "https://builds.apache.org/job/struts-annotations/job/master/2/";>struts-annotations/master
[master] [2]"
See
<https://builds.apache.org/job/struts-annotations/14/display/redirect?page=changes>
Changes:
[lukaszlenart] Defines build pipeline
--
Started by an SCM change
Running as SYSTEM
[EnvInject] - Loading node environment variables.
Building remot
See
<https://builds.apache.org/job/struts-annotations/13/display/redirect?page=changes>
Changes:
[lukaszlenart] Splits tag generated html into description and attributes
[lukaszlenart] Ignores jar
--
Started by an SCM change
Running as
Vote passed!
3x +1 GA (binding)
2015-09-29 9:25 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.6 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.5.
>
> This version drops support for APT and uses an Annotation Processor
> instead to gener
+1 (binding)
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] General Availability (GA)
Yay!
Finally I can build it with jdk 7 and 8!
Regards,
Christoph
> From: Lukasz Lenart
> To: Struts Developers List ,
> Date: 29.09.2015 09:25
> Subject: [VOTE] Struts Annotations 1.
2015-09-29 14:53 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning :
>> The Struts Annotations 1.0.6 test build is now available as a Maven
>> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.5.
>>
>> This version drops support for APT and uses an Annotation Processor
>> instead to generate ta
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.6 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.5.
>
> This version drops support for APT and uses an Annotation Processor
> instead to generate taglib info, more details can be found here:
> - https://issues.apac
Great! Thanks for the info.
+1 (binding)
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] General Availability (GA)
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2015-09-29 9:48 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> 2015-09-29 9
2015-09-29 9:46 GMT+02:00 Johannes Geppert :
> Can I use this version also with Struts 2.3.24.x ?
> At example in the Struts2 jQuery Plugin or Bootstrap Plugin which is build
> against 2.3.24.1?
It requires Java 1.7 and except that it should work.
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.l
Can I use this version also with Struts 2.3.24.x ?
At example in the Struts2 jQuery Plugin or Bootstrap Plugin which is build
against 2.3.24.1?
Johannes
#
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
2015-09-29 9:28 GMT+02:00 Luk
2015-09-29 9:25 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart :
> [ ] Leave at test build
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] General Availability (GA)
+1 (binding)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev
The Struts Annotations 1.0.6 test build is now available as a Maven
artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.5.
This version drops support for APT and uses an Annotation Processor
instead to generate taglib info, more details can be found here:
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4402
If
2013/7/2 Paul Benedict :
> My first idea was to add an "actions" attribute on the validator
> annotations. For example:
>
> @RequredStringValidator(key="firstName", actions={ "execute", "forward" })
Or maybe method names? But then the same validation could be executed
for different actions which m
My first idea was to add an "actions" attribute on the validator
annotations. For example:
@RequredStringValidator(key="firstName", actions={ "execute", "forward" })
Lacking the attribute means all methods, of course.
Thoughts?
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 1:37 AM, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2013/6/29
2013/6/28 Umesh Awasthi :
> I worked quite a bit on JSR 303 validations (Both with Hibernate Validation
> as well Apache Bval) and also worked on creating plugin to integrate it
> with Struts2, since with version 2.5/3.0 , we are looking to have some
> major changes so was wondering if i should wai
2013/6/29 Paul Benedict :
> This is the best proposed solution and I am surprised it didn't become part
> of Struts:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-1967
You can do it yourself right away ;-)
> We should add another level of XML filename checking to to be
> --.xml
What about Annotatio
This is the best proposed solution and I am surprised it didn't become part
of Struts:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-1967
We should add another level of XML filename checking to to be
--.xml
Thoughts?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:17 AM, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I am glad you're familiar
I am glad you're familiar with validation groups -- because that's exactly
what I was alluding to. I see the Struts 2 documentation allows me to
target validation on a particular method through XML only; Struts 2 simply
lacks the annotation counterpart. If today I have to use XML, okay, but
just wa
I worked quite a bit on JSR 303 validations (Both with Hibernate Validation
as well Apache Bval) and also worked on creating plugin to integrate it
with Struts2, since with version 2.5/3.0 , we are looking to have some
major changes so was wondering if i should wait for Struts 2.5/ 3.0.
On Fri,
This sounds a bit like "inversion of control". As for me, I'd rather not
like to have my model (which is to validate) to have knowledge about the
business side validation is triggered from. When I develop from the action
perpective, I know if the current method is better off triggering
validation o
Hi Paul,
actually there is one way: using @SkipValidation combined with @Validation
Or maybe I miss the point. Is there something better in your approach?
On 28 June 2013 05:38, Paul Benedict wrote:
> I was thinking it would be a good idea to add "String[] actions" on the
> validations. When emp
I was thinking it would be a good idea to add "String[] actions" on the
validations. When empty, it means all methods; otherwise only the methods
the validation should be executing with.
I don't think there's a current way to do this except through XML.
Thoughts?
Will do, I was working from memory and I thought for sure someone had
indicated that I should post it to users@
-Wes
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> If it's not something users will be interested in, IMO it's sufficient
> to announce it on the dev list. -Wendy
>
>
If it's not something users will be interested in, IMO it's sufficient
to announce it on the dev list. -Wendy
-- Forwarded message --
From: Musachy Barroso
a formality :)
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Greg Lindholm wrote:
> Nice announcement, so what is it?
---
version.
--
Martin Cooper
>>
>>> I tried to check the
>>> signatures as a last minute sanity check and noticed that it seems
>>> like the jars that are deployed are different from the jars sitting on
>>> my machine from when I ran the release... For i
>
>> I tried to check the
>> signatures as a last minute sanity check and noticed that it seems
>> like the jars that are deployed are different from the jars sitting on
>> my machine from when I ran the release... For instance -
>>
>> (on people.a.o)
&
I tried to check the
> signatures as a last minute sanity check and noticed that it seems
> like the jars that are deployed are different from the jars sitting on
> my machine from when I ran the release... For instance -
>
> (on people.a.o)
> $ shasum struts-annotations-1.0.5*.ja
ran the release... For instance -
(on people.a.o)
$ shasum struts-annotations-1.0.5*.jar
40e6914b9ed3988ae38d141099b8a10af7992d8f struts-annotations-1.0.5-javadoc.jar
e9dbf458c0f445d68b71789388a8ca6df426efcb struts-annotations-1.0.5-sources.jar
373013015e18b6cb6ae488c6755f7824f737c958 struts
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:53 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> Before I actually release, I want to make sure that I'm clear on this
> one... Martin, you mentioned that if struts-annotations was built
> against the unreleased struts-master (version 5) build that we should
> hold s
Before I actually release, I want to make sure that I'm clear on this
one... Martin, you mentioned that if struts-annotations was built
against the unreleased struts-master (version 5) build that we should
hold struts-annotations back. But, in checking the pom, the build that
was up for vot
On Sunday 16 August 2009 11:22:53 pm Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> > No Martin, my point is that the problem is that one of the steps deployed
> > stuff to a place where it shouldn't go. I'm sure that each of the steps
> > works fine, but when issui
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> No Martin, my point is that the problem is that one of the steps deployed
> stuff
> to a place where it shouldn't go. I'm sure that each of the steps works fine,
> but when issuing this command -
>
> mvn release:perform
>
> for the struts-
t against a new and unreleased struts-master, then my
>> >> vote is -1. We need to vote to release the new struts-master before we
>> >> can vote on the new struts-annotations build.
>> >
>> > http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.5/m2-st
On Sunday 16 August 2009 02:45:54 pm Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> Wes, you may not be a Maven maven, but you clearly know enough to know
> that not everything you do with Mavan causes stuff to be checked in or
> branches or labels to be created or whatever. ;-) Everything you do
> with Maven in the Str
We need to vote to release the new struts-master before we
> >> can vote on the new struts-annotations build.
> >
> > http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.5/m2-stagin
> >g- repository/org/apache/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.5/struts-
> > an
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Sunday 16 August 2009 02:11:51 pm Martin Cooper wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
>> > There have been a few small changes to both struts-master and
>> > struts-annotations...
ote on the new struts-annotations build.
>>
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.5/m2-staging-
> repository/org/apache/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.5/struts-
> annotations-1.0.5.pom
>
> It's released against a released struts-master. It i
On Sunday 16 August 2009 02:11:51 pm Martin Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> > There have been a few small changes to both struts-master and
> > struts-annotations... The change to struts-master will hopefully keep
> > someone (me) from
te is -1. We need to vote to release the new struts-master before we
>> can vote on the new struts-annotations build.
>>
>
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations-1.0.5/m2-staging-
> repository/org/apache/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.5/struts-
> annot
On Sunday 16 August 2009 02:13:26 pm Martin Cooper wrote:
> If this was built against a new and unreleased struts-master, then my
> vote is -1. We need to vote to release the new struts-master before we
> can vote on the new struts-annotations build.
>
http://people.apache.org/b
If this was built against a new and unreleased struts-master, then my
vote is -1. We need to vote to release the new struts-master before we
can vote on the new struts-annotations build.
--
Martin Cooper
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> The Struts Annotations 1.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> There have been a few small changes to both struts-master and
> struts-annotations... The change to struts-master will hopefully keep
> someone (me) from stomping on the http://struts.apache.org site when
> releasing it i
+1 GA
Cheers, Rainer
Von meinem iPhone gesendet
Am 12.08.2009 um 19:29 schrieb Wes Wannemacher :
The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven
artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not
currently
use the new features.
The test build is available in
+1 GA
Wes Wannemacher schrieb:
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently
> use the new features.
>
> The test build is available in the Struts snapshot repository located
>
Here is my +1 GA, binding
-W
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently
> use the new features.
>
> The test build is a
+1 GA
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:29 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently
> use the new features.
>
> The test build is available in the Struts snap
The Struts Annotations 1.0.5 test build is now available as a Maven
artifact. Functionality was added, but Struts releases do not currently
use the new features.
The test build is available in the Struts snapshot repository located
here -
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations
The change to struts-annotations was trivial and long over due, so
there should be no problems. Build away.
musachy
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> There have been a few small changes to both struts-master and
> struts-annotations... The change to struts-maste
There have been a few small changes to both struts-master and
struts-annotations... The change to struts-master will hopefully keep
someone (me) from stomping on the http://struts.apache.org site when
releasing it in the future. Unfortunately, the only way to test it is
to do a release (at least
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 6:33 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Thinking process: well, this is a build artifact which is not even
> part of the distribution, and we already have +4 votes, do we really
> need to wait 3 days for it?
>
> I wanted to get a 2.1 build rolling before everyone left for the
> h
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:35 PM, James Holmes wrote:
> +1 for not delaying the release of 2.1 for something we normally don't vote
> for.
You might want to check the archives. Spending 15 seconds at MarkMail shows
that we have voted on Struts Annotations 1.0.0, 1.0.1, 1.0.2, 1.
g before everyone left for the
> > holidays. Can we just get rid of the voting for it altogether?
> >
> > musachy
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> > > On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Musachy Barroso
> > wrote:
> > >
arroso
> wrote:
> >> Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts
> >> Annotations release 1.0.4
> >
> > What Martin said. Unless I missed something, you only posted the vote
> > last night...
> >
> > I realize it's a pai
sachy Barroso
> wrote:
> >> Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts
> >> Annotations release 1.0.4
> >
> > What Martin said. Unless I missed something, you only posted the vote
> > last night...
> >
> > I realize it's a pa
?
musachy
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>> Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts
>> Annotations release 1.0.4
>
> What Martin said. Unless I missed something, you only posted
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts
> Annotations release 1.0.4
What Martin said. Unless I missed something, you only posted the vote
last night...
I realize it's a pain to wait when you want to
You're calling it after 19 hours? What happened to 72 hours?
--
Martin Cooper
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts
> Annotations release 1.0.4
>
> Binding:
> +1 Don Brown
> +1 Raine
s/James Homes/James Holmes/, sorry ;)
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts
> Annotations release 1.0.4
>
> Binding:
> +1 Don Brown
> +1 Rainer Hermanns
> +1 Musachy Barroso
> +1 Jame
Here are the results of the vote for going GA with the Struts
Annotations release 1.0.4
Binding:
+1 Don Brown
+1 Rainer Hermanns
+1 Musachy Barroso
+1 James Homes
I'll post an announcement when the files are available.
musachy
--
"Hey you! Would you help me to carry the stone?&q
7;t vote on the quality of POM
> files, and those are more public.
>
> Don
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 9:24 PM, Don Brown wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
>>> The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available
+1 GA
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3.
>
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality
+1 GA
cheers,
Rainer
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3.
>
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality:
>
> [ ] Leave at test build
&
wrote:
>> The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven
>> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3.
>>
>> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
>> a vote on its quality:
>>
>> [ ] Leave at test bu
+1
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven
> artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3.
>
> If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
> a vote on its quality:
&
The Struts Annotations 1.0.4 test build is now available as a Maven
artifact. It is a dependency of Struts 2.1.3.
If you have had a chance to review the test build, please respond with
a vote on its quality:
[ ] Leave at test build
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[ ] General Availability (GA)
Everyone who
2008/4/1, Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> just to make sure, is it correct that the Struts Annotations 1.0.3
> release never made it to the central repo
> and is still within the staging directory?
No, it is not correct. I think that we completely forgot about Stru
Hi,
just to make sure, is it correct that the Struts Annotations 1.0.3
release never made it to the central repo
and is still within the staging directory?
cheers,
Rainer
On Feb 17, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Don Brown wrote:
The test build of Struts Annotations 1.0.3 is available.
Maven 2
[X] +1 Publish to the Maven 2 repository
Cheers,
Rene
Am So, 17.02.2008, 09:34, schrieb Don Brown:
> The test build of Struts Annotations 1.0.3 is available.
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
>*
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/m2-
2008/2/17, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Don, the signatures are missing:
Mmm... This is blocking, sorry for not noticing it. I change my vote to:
-1
until you upload the signatures.
Sorry Don.
Antonio
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
+1
On Feb 17, 2008 11:17 AM, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Feb 17, 2008 3:34 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The test build of Struts Annotations 1.0.3 is available.
> >
> > Maven 2 staging repository:
> &g
+1
On Feb 17, 2008 3:34 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The test build of Struts Annotations 1.0.3 is available.
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
>*
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/m2-staging-repository/
>
> Once y
+1
cheers,
Rainer
> The test build of Struts Annotations 1.0.3 is available.
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
>*
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/m2-staging-repository/
>
> Once you have had a chance to review the test build, please
On Feb 17, 2008 1:34 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The test build of Struts Annotations 1.0.3 is available.
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
>*
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/m2-staging-repository/
Don, the sign
+1
Antonio
2008/2/17, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The test build of Struts Annotations 1.0.3 is available.
>
> Maven 2 staging repository:
>
>*
> http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/struts-annotations/1.0.3/m2-staging-repository/
>
> Once you have h
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
