Since there are no existing struts-faces users, I don't think we
should make our lives difficult or boring :^)
I should clarify "since there are no existing users of a released
version of struts-faces..."
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.germuska.com
"In fact,
I see no reason why struts-faces shouldn't track the development of
Struts. It should always build against CVS HEAD and the same
dependencies. Maybe at some point in the future we'd need a
"maintenance" branch of struts-faces, but I don't think enough
people use it yet for us to get hung up o
I am wondering if the reason that this post has not been answered is
because nobody really knows the answer. Is that the case? is there no
"roadmap" for struts faces? I can't seem to find one anywhere.
I think you assign too much formality to struts-faces. Craig is super
busy, and he is the
At 2:16 PM + 6/2/04, Michael Rasmussen wrote:
I am wondering if the reason that this post has not been answered is
because nobody really knows the answer. Is that the case? is
there no "roadmap" for struts faces? I can't seem to find one
anywhere.
I think you assign too much formality to
quot;Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: struts-faces target which v of struts
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 22:33:51 -0400
Currently there are several places in struts-faces where faces relies on
deprecated methods in struts. Obviously this is not
Currently there are several places in struts-faces where faces relies on
deprecated methods in struts. Obviously this is not good for the long term
compatibility of struts faces. Which version of the struts framework is the
next point release of faces supposed to target? I am wondering because t
