--- On Tue, 9/16/08, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> I blame Velocity. :)
Oh, duh, right... forgot about that.
I was hoping there'd be yet something else I had to keep in mind; things aren't
complicated enough :p
I'll probably move most/all the constants into the struts.xml and add a comment
saying that
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:37 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I ran the archetype it created a "tutorial" directory. The
> src/main/resources/struts.properties file (appended) didn't have all the
> comments/etc. in the struts.properties from starter-archetype.
>
> It's (disturbi
--- On Tue, 9/16/08, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> Different from what? I'm not sure what you're comparing.
(ObCaveat: when I did this I had been up for two days, so...)
When I ran the archetype it created a "tutorial" directory. The
src/main/resources/struts.properties file (appended) didn't have all t
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --- On Fri, 9/12/08, Wendy Smoak wrote:
>> (Dave, if you'd like to make that change on the branch, it can go
>> into the next release. Is it relevant on trunk, where the archetype
>> needs to be fixed to work with Struts 2.1
