ligatoire. Étant donné que les email peuvent facilement
être sujets à la manipulation, nous ne pouvons accepter aucune responsabilité
pour le contenu fourni.
> Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 22:15:46 +0100
> Subject: xwork: TextProviderSupport vs DefaultTextProvider
> From: lukasz.len...@goo
If I don't remember wrong the DefaultTextProvider is pushed into the
stack, so i18n works, and TextProviderSupport is used statically from
different places.
musachy
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> What is the difference between those two? I read comments but it isn't
> st
What is the difference between those two? I read comments but it isn't
still clear for me why we have two different implementation. It looks
like DefaultTextProvider is used for testing and bootstrap (as
"system" bean). But TextProviderSupport is used for everything else.
Any thoughts?
Regards
-
