Re: Test Test

2004-03-28 Thread James Mitchell
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004, Craig McClanahan wrote: Got it. > Testing new mail setup ... sorry for the noise. > > Craig > > -- James Mitchell Software Developer / Struts Evangelist http://www.struts-atlanta.org - To unsubscribe, e-m

Bug report for Struts [2004/03/28]

2004-03-28 Thread bugzilla
+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

[Validator] release(was : Re: Counting down to the 1.2.1 release)

2004-03-28 Thread Robert Leland
Martin Cooper wrote: >There have been some Validator discussions going on on commons-dev, >related to JavaScript, so I'm going to wait for a green light from someone >(David G?) before I roll Validator 1.1.2. Ok, Validator is now using DOM Level 1 compatable calls to resolve the form name. Thank

Re: [Validator] release(was : Re: Counting down to the 1.2.1 release)

2004-03-28 Thread David Graham
--- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Cooper wrote: > >There have been some Validator discussions going on on commons-dev, > >related to JavaScript, so I'm going to wait for a green light from > someone > >(David G?) before I roll Validator 1.1.2. I just updated the docs and websi

Re: [Validator] release(was : Re: Counting down to the 1.2.1 release)

2004-03-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, Robert Leland wrote: > Martin Cooper wrote: > >There have been some Validator discussions going on on commons-dev, > >related to JavaScript, so I'm going to wait for a green light from someone > >(David G?) before I roll Validator 1.1.2. > > > Ok, Validator is now using DOM Le

Re: [Validator] release(was : Re: Counting down to the 1.2.1 release)

2004-03-28 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 28 Mar 2004, David Graham wrote: > > --- Robert Leland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Martin Cooper wrote: > > >There have been some Validator discussions going on on commons-dev, > > >related to JavaScript, so I'm going to wait for a green light from > > someone > > >(David G?) before I r