DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29343] - NPE while trying to use Struts 1.1. with Xerces 2.6.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29343] - NPE while trying to use Struts 1.1. with Xerces 2.6.2

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsConsultants

Date: 2004-06-09T05:06:38 Editor: 194.39.131.40 <> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsConsultants URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsConsultants no comment Change Log: -- @@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ ''

Roll back Commons Validator dependancy ( was Struts 1.2.1 release plan)

I just found out I've been patching and testing the wrong branch of the Commons Validator component :( Between this snafu and the issues with Struts Faces, perhaps the best thing would be to roll back the changes that create a dependence on Commons Validator 1.1.3. Do we know if there are any d

no nightly builds are working

It doesn't appear that any of the nightly builds are running; not just struts-faces. I checked this morning and struts hasn't built since June 5 and neither has struts-faces. Perhaps Craig turned off his machine??? Craig are you out there -James -Original Message- From: Martin

Re: Struts 1.2.1 release?

Robert, It's very important to remember that the mere fact we roll a release doesn't mean it will ever get past alpha. The overall average at Jakarta seems to be five or six alpha/beta releases to each stable release. This will be the second point release in the 1.2.x series. It may be voted st

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

I'm not using Struts Faces in production, but that shouldn't matter. The point is that 99% of Struts users don't use the nightly builds. People won't be using Struts-Faces for a long time unless it supports 1.1. -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

Sorry James...I was saying those questions should be asked in the users list. Not wondering what you are using. Sorry for the confusing way it was asked. Michael From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EM

RE: no nightly builds are working

The build on the 5th(struts-faces) is empty. I assume each build before that is empty too. nothing happened on the 5ht except that the empty builds were not posted anymore. There is also now a build for the 9th posted on the site. Michael From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

At 11:00 PM -0400 6/8/04, James Holmes wrote: Good question. Depending on how long you've been paying attention to Struts and the dev list in particular, you may know that things tend to move pretty slow in the Struts development/release cycle world. Mostly this is because the committers (I'm ver

Re: no nightly builds are working

... and the files for the 9th are not empty! - Original Message - From: "Michael Rasmussen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 2:27 PM Subject: RE: no nightly builds are working > The build on the 5th(struts-faces) is empty. I assume each build

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

The issue with the validator that prevents the struts-faces code from working with Struts 1.1 and CVS head is the removal of .ValidatorUtil and the creation of .util.ValidatorUtils. Struts 1.1 use ValidatorUtil and the CVS head uses util.ValidatorUtils. The thing that could fix this is to

Re: Roll back Commons Validator dependancy ( was Struts 1.2.1 release plan)

Since you patched HEAD, maybe we should forget about the branch and 1.1.3 and just release 1.2.0. If 1.2.0 is a dud we can quickly patch it and release 1.2.1. Quick releases are one benefit of the (IMO confusing) httpd style versioning. I would rather see us moving forward than rolling back patc

Who owns validator?

Are the struts committers the only ones who vote on validator? or is there an actual maintainer (and committers) for validator? _ Check out the coupons and bargains on MSN Offers! http://youroffers.msn.com --

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

At 9:55 AM -0400 6/9/04, James Holmes wrote: The issue with the validator that prevents the struts-faces code from working with Struts 1.1 and CVS head is the removal of .ValidatorUtil and the creation of .util.ValidatorUtils. Struts 1.1 use ValidatorUtil and the CVS head uses util.Validat

RE: no nightly builds are working

Yep, we can close out the bug now. -Original Message- From: Niall Pemberton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 8:44 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: no nightly builds are working ... and the files for the 9th are not empty! - Original Message -

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28668] - struts-faces nightlies are empty

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: no nightly builds are working

Hmm...that build for the ninth wasn't up there this morning. Perhaps Craig kicked the box :) At any rate, we finally have a new build. Hopefully the nightly stuff will be running again at its regularly scheduled time. -James -Original Message- From: Michael Rasmussen [mailto:[EMAIL PRO

Re: struts-faces - which version of Struts

This seems like a good plan - it only has three methods which are the same in both classes and the old could call the new Niall - Original Message - From: "James Holmes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Struts Developers List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2004 2:55 PM Subject:

Re: Who owns validator?

http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/validator/team-list.html David --- Michael Rasmussen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are the struts committers the only ones who vote on validator? or is > there > an actual maintainer (and committers) for validator? > > __

Re: Roll back Commons Validator dependancy ( was Struts 1.2.1 release plan)

Actually, I don't think any Struts release has included a validator 1.1.x build. So we haven't given people a chance to remove references to deprecated functionality that has been removed in the 1.2.x series. You could either apply the patches to the branch or just release 1.1.3 from the branch

Struts 1.1 J2EE level?

Since I can't find a sure answer from user mailing list, I have to forward the question here - please see below. You guys wrote struts and I think should have a quick answer. Thanks in advance. -Original Message- From: Yulin Zhao [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2004 4:

RE: struts-faces - which version of Struts

On Wed, 09 Jun 2004 08:59:38 -0500, Joe Germuska wrote: > Someone needs to apply the patches to the VALIDATOR_1_1_2_BRANCH. > I'm not sure if Ted still has time to spend or not. I've got some time scheduled to work on this Thursday night, or, if this isn't done, setting up my credentials to sign

RE: Struts 1.1 J2EE level?

I know struts 1.1 builds on servlet 2.2 but I am not sure about the jsp dependency. I am alomst certain it will work on JSP 1.2 but someone else needs to confirm that. As far as I know there are no other dependence issues for J2EE 1.2. Are there others you are concerned about? From: "Yulin

RE: Struts 1.1 J2EE level?

Yeah i checked it... see the dev roadmap here... http://jakarta.apache.org/struts/status.html From: "Yulin Zhao" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Struts 1.1 J2EE level? Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:26:3

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc project.xml

jholmes 2004/06/09 11:35:26 Modified:doc project.xml Log: updated the link to list archive to the proper place Revision ChangesPath 1.49 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/project.xml Index: project.xml =

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28983] - Unimplemented Servlet 2.3 methods in MultipartRequestWrapper

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Struts 1.1 J2EE level?

Great!! Thanks so much! We can go ahead and start our project. [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/09/2004 12:18:57 PM Please respond to "Struts Developers List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc:(bcc: Yulin Zhao/FBFS) Subject: RE: Struts 1.1 J2EE level? Yeah i checked it... see

RE: Struts 1.1 J2EE level?

Just be sure you can deploy the sample applications that come bundled with Struts first. If those work for you, then everything should be fine. The last time I tested against the older versions, the one problem was XML parsing, since some of the extensions we used at the time were no longer in d

struts faces compiles on jsf 1.1

Good news for anyone who cares. I tested struts faces against jsf 1.1. It seems to build just fine. Not suggesting it should depend on 1.1 just noting that it builds. Michael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For add

RE: struts faces compiles on jsf 1.1

Thanks for the heads up. I was going to test that out tonight. Have you experienced any problems with the sample applications like those mentioned in this posting: http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jsp?forum=427&thread=500294 I am seeing the same problems that are posted in the forum. I'm plann