DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27332] - The bundle attr do not have subapp resolution.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Ready to Help: Guide Wanted!

Okay, Struts! I am CVS ready (sort of) and ready to work on Struts. I am not at all new to Stuts and understand the whole very well. But, I am completely new to this open source work. Someone want to "mentor" me in and give me a step-by-step guide to helping out? You tell me what needs to be

RE: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.1 Alpha, Beta, or GA? (was Re: Struts 1.2.1 release)

+1 Beta Steve > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: July 8, 2004 7:48 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.1 Alpha, Beta, or GA? (was Re: Struts 1.2.1 > release) > > > The repository is tagged for STRUTS_1_2_1, and the release is

Re: Ready to Help: Guide Wanted!

If you wanted to start with the documentation, I noticed that there are some items in the Newbie FAQ * http://struts.apache.org/faqs/newbie.html that could be integrated into the main documentation, particularly the ones regarding ActionForms. It's mainly cut and paste from one XML doc to anoth

[OT] Cygwin

I am preparing to jump in as a new struts slave. Some of you have been using cygwin for your development. Can I get the general consensus on whether this is a good idea? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additio

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23337] - 'integer' rule doesn't work properly with indexed properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Ready to Help: Guide Wanted!

Thanks, Ted, I am on the job. ///;-) Michael At 06:54 AM 7/10/2004, you wrote: If you wanted to start with the documentation, I noticed that there are some items in the Newbie FAQ * http://struts.apache.org/faqs/newbie.html that could be integrated into the main documentation, particularly the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23337] - 'integer' rule doesn't work properly with indexed properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23370] - Unable to validate indexed properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23337] - 'integer' rule doesn't work properly with indexed properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26413] - Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23370] - Unable to validate indexed properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [OT] Cygwin

For the routine stuff, I just use PuTTY and WinCVS. * PuTTY provides the connection to the Apache server. * WinCVS handles the CVS tasks (via PuTTY). I also use the same setup for SourceForge projects, which is quite convenient. I know many people like TortoiseCVS, which might be simplest of all

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23370] - Unable to validate indexed properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23370] - Unable to validate indexed properties

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26413] - Indexed Field Date Validation Allows Invalid Dates

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27332] - The bundle attr do not have subapp resolution.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.1 Alpha, Beta, or GA? (was Re: Struts 1.2.1 release)

Ted, 48 Hours since your call for a vote and its a unanimous +1 for Beta so far (from the people who matter) - theres only 4 PMC members who are active on this list who haven't voted so far - how long before the VOTE is declared? Niall PMC Binding Votes: -- Don Brown: +1

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.1 Alpha, Beta, or GA? (was Re: Struts 1.2.1 release)

The earliest I can schedule another block of time for Struts is tomorrow night. I'm thinking #27332 would be good to include, so I may tag, roll, and post 1.2.2 as the Beta instead, with the 2.0.8 ORO dependency. If there are any other "mostly harmless" changes people would like to slip in, now

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.2.1 Alpha, Beta, or GA? (was Re: Struts 1.2.1 release)

Or, if someone else want to put 1.2.1 into distribution today, that would be fine with me too :) On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 11:16:09 -0400, Ted Husted wrote: > The earliest I can schedule another block of time for Struts is > tomorrow night. > > I'm thinking #27332 would be good to include, so I may tag

RE: [OT] Cygwin

There are occasionally some issues with it that make it inconvenient for novice users, but I couldn't live without it. I can't imagine how people get real work done without it (unless they don't use Windows). > -Original Message- > From: Michael McGrady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I a

RE: [OT] Cygwin

What is it that cygwin does for you, Dave? I know the shell commands, etc., so that is not an issue. I just don't know quite what is the point of using a Linux emulator. I do have a Linux box that I keep up with, except it is not networked. I generally use BASH and VIM. Anyway, could you t

RE: [OT] Cygwin

> -Original Message- > From: Michael McGrady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 7:00 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: [OT] Cygwin > > > I am preparing to jump in as a new struts slave. Some of you have been > using cygwin for your development. Can I get

RE: [OT] Cygwin

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 11:08 AM > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: [OT] Cygwin > > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael McGrady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Saturday, July 10, 200

Sleeves Rolled Up

Okay, Struts! I am CVS ready (sort of) and ready to work on Struts. I am not at all new to Stuts and understand the whole very well. But, I am completely new to this open source work. Someone want to "mentor" me in and give me a step-by-step guide to helping out? You tell me what needs to be

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30030] New: - html:rewrite tag doesn't support action parameter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30030] - html:rewrite tag doesn't support action parameter

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

[VOTE] - Bill Siggelkow for committer

I have known Bill for a few years and he is definitely committer material. He has contributed in numerous ways to this community and others. I owe him a great deal for his help with our local Struts Users group, founded in Atlanta (ASUG) http://www.struts-atlanta.org. He has given presentations,

Re: [VOTE] - Bill Siggelkow for committer

James Mitchell wrote: I have known Bill for a few years and he is definitely committer material. He has contributed in numerous ways to this community and others. I owe him a great deal for his help with our local Struts Users group, founded in Atlanta (ASUG) http://www.struts-atlanta.org. He has

Interim Build Location

In catching up on back email, I noticed a piece of advice about where to put interim builds that should be made available to the public for review, but are not official signed releases (which would go to http://www.apache.org/dist). The suggestion from infrastructure was to use: http://cvs.

RE: [VOTE] - Bill Siggelkow for committer

+1 I know Bill too and can vouch for everything Mitchell mentions. His music may be a little strange, but... Just kidding Bill! -James -Original Message- From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, July 10, 2004 10:03 PM To: Struts Developers List Subject: [VOTE] -

Re: [VOTE] - Bill Siggelkow for committer

Unfortunately, I don't have the benefit of personally knowing Bill. I haven't seen any patches or emails on the dev list to know anything about the quality of his work. For those reasons I can't give a +1 but I do respect James' opinion so I won't stand in the way. +0 David --- James Mitchell

Re: [VOTE] - Bill Siggelkow for committer

+0, As David said I don't know Bill, but look forward to changing that. James Mitchell wrote: I have known Bill for a few years and he is definitely committer material. He has contributed in numerous ways to this community and others. I owe him a great deal for his help with our local Struts Users