Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as > long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x and 2.x paths too soon, > simply because I don't think there is enough energy here to sustain > two parallel version of Struts.

Re: Roadmap

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:29:40 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > * The request may not have come from a form or a link; it may have > been submitted using an XMLHttpRequest object. In such cases, forms > as we talk about them are not relevant. Instead, we may want to > provide the request input in the fo

Re: Maven build

+1 As guys who are always touting "standards", I think it behooves us to do everything we can to provide the community with a "best practices" example of using Maven to manage a rich, complex project, like Struts. (At least if doing that scratches someone's itch.) Maven provides a standard fra

RE: Roadmap

> -Original Message- > From: Mike Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > The other thing I would add is strong debuggability. Is it > true that Tapestry's web > > debugging is the best of the current crop of web > application frameworks? > "Line precise error messages" - are very u

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31514] - Either insufficient docs on validwhen or a bug

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: Roadmap

> -Original Message- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > While I don't disagree with any of Ted's points, I do think that we > need to expand our horizons with Struts Next, rather than just provide > more of the same. We need to move beyond the traditional web app and > emb

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31702] New: - Feature Request: action chaining tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: CVS -> SVN

I'd like to roll a release after you are finished with that. I really, REALLY want to keep these rolling (about 1 every few weeks) which has the added benefit of (hopefully) breaking this bad habit we seem to be in (~18 month GA release cycle). -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source E

Re: CVS -> SVN

I also believe that Struts can release more often that every 18 months, but I don't know if a new release every few weeks will help. In some cases, I think it might hurt Struts, because it can make things pretty confusing for users. I can see it now on the user list: User A: "I need help trying t

Re: CVS -> SVN

Works for me. I'm getting ready for a one-day trip on Thursday, but if it's not done by this weekend, I'll do it as soon as I get back. On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:37:39 -0400, James Mitchell wrote: > I'd like to roll a release after you are finished with that.  I > really, REALLY want to keep these r

RE: Roadmap

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:10 +0100, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > One more thing: Could we finally start designing to Java interfaces > into Struts2? Ta. > > interface IActionRequest { ... } > interface IActionResponse { ... } > interface IActionForward { ... } > > interface IActionContext { >    IAc

RE: Maven build

> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ==== > > > +1 > ==== > > Ditto for Subversion. I was stunned by how many Subversion > questions there were. It's obvious that a lot of people can > use a "compelling replacement for CVS", that is easy to > in

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsDocView

Date: 2004-10-13T09:23:14 Editor: UlrichElsner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsDocView URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsDocView no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,3 +1,6 @@

Re: Roadmap

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:10 +0100, Pilgrim, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > While I don't disagree with any of Ted's points, I do think that we > > need to expand our horizons with Struts Next, rather than ju

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31702] - Feature Request: action chaining tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: CVS -> SVN

+1 Hubert Rabago wrote: I also believe that Struts can release more often that every 18 months, but I don't know if a new release every few weeks will help. In some cases, I think it might hurt Struts, because it can make things pretty confusing for users. I can see it now on the user list: Use

RE: Roadmap

> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13. oktober 2004 16:13 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Roadmap > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:10 +0100, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > > I think we need to define a feature common denominator table of > > what c

RE: Roadmap

> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 13. oktober 2004 16:13 > To: Struts Developers List > Subject: RE: Roadmap > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 12:53:10 +0100, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: > > I think we need to define a feature common denominator table of > > what c

ApacheCon

Any Struts committers planning on attending ApacheCon? If so, how about the Hackathon? I'll be there and am anxious to have lively discussions over these "roadmap" ideas being brought up. Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P

RE: CVS -> SVN

Forgive my possible ignorance, but what is the policy on new releases? I've understood that we can release whenever we want, that version numbers are cheap and that you vote whether to make a release alpha/beta/GA. But, what goes into a release? Does new features/enhancements go into a 1.2.x releas

RE: CVS -> SVN

Forgive my possible ignorance, but what is the policy on new releases? I've understood that we can release whenever we want, that version numbers are cheap and that you vote whether to make a release alpha/beta/GA. But, what goes into a release? Does new features/enhancements go into a 1.2.x releas

Re: ApacheCon

Unfortunately, I had scheduling conflicts so I'm going to miss this one :-(. Craig On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:20:56 -0700, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any Struts committers planning on attending ApacheCon? If so, how about > the Hackathon? I'll be there and am anxious to have lively di

Re: CVS -> SVN

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 22:23:32 +0200, Anders Steinlein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Forgive my possible ignorance, but what is the policy on new releases? > I've understood that we can release whenever we want, that version numbers > are cheap and that you vote whether to make a release alpha/beta/GA

Re: ApacheCon

I'm hoping to be at ApacheCon for the first time this year, and still trying to figure out what the Hackathon is all about. ;-) -- Martin Cooper On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 13:20:56 -0700, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Any Struts committers planning on attending ApacheCon? If so, how about > t

Re: Subversion Refactoring Frenzy and Maven Questions

On Wed, 13 Oct 2004 06:26:00 -0400, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 15:22:38 -0700, Martin Cooper wrote: > > That said, I would really like to see us all stick together for as > > long as possible, and not diverge into 1.x and 2.x paths too soon, > > simply because I don