DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33326] New: - Strange value exchange between two formbeans.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33326] - Strange value exchange between two formbeans.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33326] - Strange value exchange between two formbeans.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33328] New: - Javascript error when validating a null hidden field

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: ViewCVS Subversion interface is currently down

Seems like its back now. Niall - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33332] New: - Strict html4 compatibility broken by request token input filed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33332] - Strict html4 compatibility broken by request token input filed

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32016] - tag renders incorrect HTML 4.01 strict when using token

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn checkout

Hi Are they any good online docs on using "svn" with Struts 1.3? I tried very last night on my linux box: % svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/trunk struts But I must admit I didnt know what I was doing at all. Do you have to ``svn login'' or whatever? -- Peter Pilgrim Operati

Missing svn commit: r123447

This commit seems to have gone missing - I don't see it in the new "taglib" sub-project. I'm guessing this happened when Don extracted the taglibs out of core and into their own sub-project? All I can see from the commit message when taglibs were moved on 30/12/2004 is the following... struts/tag

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33326] - Strange value exchange between two formbeans.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: svn checkout

At 5:30 PM + 2/1/05, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: Hi Are they any good online docs on using "svn" with Struts 1.3? I tried very last night on my linux box: % svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/trunk struts But I must admit I didnt know what I was doing at all. Do you have to ``svn lo

svn commit: r149429 - struts/apps/trunk/dao/src/test/org/apache/struts/apps/mailreader/dao/BaseTestUserDatabase.java

Author: jmitchell Date: Tue Feb 1 10:27:53 2005 New Revision: 149429 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=149429 Log: finished tests for UserDatabase Modified: struts/apps/trunk/dao/src/test/org/apache/struts/apps/mailreader/dao/BaseTestUserDatabase.java Modified: struts/apps/t

Chains information

I was just curious, reading this mailing list for a long time, and learning a lot I have seen a lot of thingd about commons chain, struts chain, how it will integrate in struts 1.3 for the RequestProcessor, and then maybe at the action level. A part of the apache c

Re: Chains information

At 10:37 PM +0100 2/1/05, Carl Azoury wrote: I was just curious, reading this mailing list for a long time, and learning a lot I have seen a lot of thingd about commons chain, struts chain, how it will integrate in struts 1.3 for the RequestProcessor, and then maybe at the action level.

Re: Chains information

Joe is correct that you don't have to understand chain to use Struts 1.3. But if you do learn about chains, you will be able to configure Struts even more to your liking! I personally lovel chain. Once you see how it works in Struts you will be able to find uses for it in your own programs. I a

Re: svn checkout

Joe Germuska wrote: At 5:30 PM + 2/1/05, Pilgrim, Peter wrote: Hi Are they any good online docs on using "svn" with Struts 1.3? I tried very last night on my linux box: % svn checkout http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/trunk struts But I must admit I didnt know what I was doing at all. Do

Re: svn checkout

You'd be better off using "current" svn co http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/current That gets you only "trunk" of each subproject. Trust me, you'll quickly get tired of typing an extra "../../" when you are flying around the repository on the command line ;) -- James Mitchell Software En

Re: Missing svn commit: r123447

What do you mean? The files are there, did we lose the history or properties or something? -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Niall Pemberton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers Lis

Re: Missing svn commit: r123447

I was looking at the history of revisions for FormTag in the taglib sub project using ViewCVS - there is no record of Martin's Revision 123447. However looking into it further - the code changes to FormTag are there but they're showing under revision 12703 - which was Don's revision extracting tag