Re: Mavenized nightlies

2005-02-27 Thread Joe Germuska
At 12:28 AM -0500 2/27/05, James Mitchell wrote: I'll begin pushing these up until we can get this process on Apache hardware. http://svn.apache.org/builds/struts/maven/ Awesome, James -- great work! Joe -- Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.germuska.com "Narrow minds are

Re: struts build change questions

2005-02-27 Thread James Mitchell
Ok, now this is interesting. "mock" depends on "core", and "core tests" depend on "mock". Maven wants to build/test for each distribution, so the "first time" developer is in a chicken-and-egg state trying to "maven build-all" or even "maven dist" one at a time. I would say we put the mock ob

Re: struts build change questions

2005-02-27 Thread Joe Germuska
At 12:32 PM -0500 2/27/05, James Mitchell wrote: Ok, now this is interesting. "mock" depends on "core", and "core tests" depend on "mock". Maven wants to build/test for each distribution, so the "first time" developer is in a chicken-and-egg state trying to "maven build-all" or even "maven dis

Re: struts build change questions

2005-02-27 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 12:32:31 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, now this is interesting. "mock" depends on "core", and "core tests" > depend on "mock". Maven wants to build/test for each distribution, so the > "first time" developer is in a chicken-and-egg state trying to "mav

Re: Mavenized nightlies

2005-02-27 Thread Martin Cooper
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:28:43 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll begin pushing these up until we can get this process on Apache > hardware. Cool. I'll try to get something running on minotaur. BTW, why does the 'core' folder have a different icon from the others? It looks a bi

Re: Mavenized nightlies

2005-02-27 Thread Paul Speed
Martin Cooper wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:28:43 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll begin pushing these up until we can get this process on Apache hardware. Cool. I'll try to get something running on minotaur. BTW, why does the 'core' folder have a different icon from the othe

[shale] minor tweak to usecases build script

2005-02-27 Thread Sean Schofield
In usecases build file ${servlet.jar} should be changed to ${servlet-api.jar} ... ... sean - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mavenized nightlies

2005-02-27 Thread Joe Germuska
At 10:08 AM -0800 2/27/05, Martin Cooper wrote: On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 00:28:43 -0500, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll begin pushing these up until we can get this process on Apache hardware. Cool. I'll try to get something running on minotaur. BTW, why does the 'core' folder have a

svn commit: r155633 - in struts/flow/trunk/src: java/org/apache/struts/flow/sugar/ScriptableDynaBean.java java/org/apache/struts/flow/sugar/ScriptableMap.java java/org/apache/struts/flow/sugar/SugarWrapFactory.java test/wrappersTest.js

2005-02-27 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Sun Feb 27 11:37:42 2005 New Revision: 155633 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=155633 Log: Changed lookup order of Map and DynaBean to be property, map value which means if you called map.size() and there existed a map.put("size", "foo"), you would always call th

Re: struts build change questions

2005-02-27 Thread Ted Husted
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 11:37:40 -0600, Joe Germuska wrote: > At 12:32 PM -0500 2/27/05, James Mitchell wrote: >> Ok, now this is interesting.  "mock" depends on "core", and "core >> tests" depend on "mock".  Maven wants to build/test for each >> distribution, so the "first time" developer is in a chic

Re: struts-config extends

2005-02-27 Thread Hubert Rabago
The answer could be simpler than I originally thought, and it revealed itself in the code. Since a custom config object would have to extend the original, say FormBeanConfig, it would be up to the subclass to override the inheritFrom() method which is what actually copies config properties from an

Re: struts build change questions

2005-02-27 Thread James Mitchell
I think the best solution to this now would be to put the mock classes back under core test and simply build them as a separate jar (so taglib and tiles can use them). Do you agree? -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Orig

Re: struts build change questions

2005-02-27 Thread Joe Germuska
At 5:25 PM -0500 2/27/05, James Mitchell wrote: I think the best solution to this now would be to put the mock classes back under core test and simply build them as a separate jar (so taglib and tiles can use them). Do you agree? If mock were simply included in struts-core.jar, then taglib and

svn commit: r155650 - struts/core/trunk/doc/userGuide/configuration.xml

2005-02-27 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Sun Feb 27 15:54:39 2005 New Revision: 155650 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=155650 Log: Adding chainConfig init parameter documentation Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/userGuide/configuration.xml Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/userGuide/configuration.xm

Can we remove data-source support?

2005-02-27 Thread Don Brown
Are we going to finally remove data-source support for 1.3? If so, I don't mind going through the code and docs to clean it out. Related question: if we were to remove data-source support, should we remove it from the docs immediately? Do the docs reflect the current state of the code or the

svn commit: r155651 - struts/core/trunk/doc/userGuide/index.xml

2005-02-27 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Sun Feb 27 16:13:28 2005 New Revision: 155651 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=155651 Log: Fixing link to tiles section Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/userGuide/index.xml Modified: struts/core/trunk/doc/userGuide/index.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/view

svn commit: r155656 - struts/apps/trunk/blank/build.xml

2005-02-27 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Sun Feb 27 17:36:42 2005 New Revision: 155656 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=155656 Log: * Changed dist directory to be WEB-INF/dist * Removed jdbc jar references * Updated version to 1.3 * Changed servlet jar reference to default to relative location when

svn commit: r155657 - struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/build.xml

2005-02-27 Thread craigmcc
Author: craigmcc Date: Sun Feb 27 17:50:46 2005 New Revision: 155657 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=155657 Log: Correct references ${servlet.jar} to be ${servlet-api.jar}. Reported by: Sean Schofield Modified: struts/shale/trunk/use-cases/build.xml Modified: struts/shale/

Re: [shale] minor tweak to usecases build script

2005-02-27 Thread Craig McClanahan
Thanks ... fixed (and in the test classpath too :-). Craig On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 13:28:32 -0500, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In usecases build file ${servlet.jar} should be changed to ${servlet-api.jar} > > > ... > > > > ... > > > sean > > --

svn commit: r155658 - struts/apps/trunk/blank/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml

2005-02-27 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Sun Feb 27 18:04:23 2005 New Revision: 155658 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=155658 Log: Removing old init params not supported anymore Modified: struts/apps/trunk/blank/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml Modified: struts/apps/trunk/blank/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.x

Blank webapp taglibs removed?

2005-02-27 Thread Don Brown
James, any reason you moved the taglib definitions from the Blank application? Since there are still useful tags, it would be nice to include the TLD's for new applications. Don - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For a

Re: Blank webapp taglibs removed?

2005-02-27 Thread James Mitchell
I thought we were moving up to 2.3 ? Do you mean a) defining them in web.xml or b) including them "just because" ? -- James Mitchell Software Engineer / Open Source Evangelist EdgeTech, Inc. 678.910.8017 AIM: jmitchtx - Original Message - From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Strut

Re: Blank webapp taglibs removed?

2005-02-27 Thread Don Brown
James Mitchell wrote: I thought we were moving up to 2.3 ? Do you mean a) defining them in web.xml or b) including them "just because" ? Sorry, I meant to type "remove". I see your point though, since 2.3 doesn't require taglibs to be defined in web.xml, which I forgot about, so nevermind. :)

svn commit: r155660 - struts/apps/trunk/blank/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xml

2005-02-27 Thread mrdon
Author: mrdon Date: Sun Feb 27 20:03:12 2005 New Revision: 155660 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=155660 Log: * Adding back load-on-startup parameter * Fixing comment to remove reference to removed debugging setting Modified: struts/apps/trunk/blank/src/webapp/WEB-INF/web.xm