[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

2005-03-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project struts-taglib (in module struts) failed

2005-03-11 Thread Stefan Bodewig
To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project struts-taglib has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affect

Re: Storing current ActionContext in ThreadLocal

2005-03-11 Thread Joe Germuska
At 9:02 PM -0800 3/10/05, Martin Cooper wrote: I would think we should just have the getter and setter in the interface, and leave the actual thread-local part to the implementation. Note that the getter and setter don't tie the impl to the use of thread-locals, so if someone came up with an altern

Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload

2005-03-11 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
I gotta be honest with you, I've never used the upload capability in Struts. I only needed upload functionality in one Struts app I wrote, and it was an application that was originally using my old custom framework that had its own way of doing uploads, so that just got ported with the app. S

Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] New: BuildingShale

2005-03-11 Thread Eugênio Saulo
I´ve had problems with proxy when checking out the modules (report of ... 400 bad request). But the problem was fixed when i changed the url to https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/shale/trunk/ (using ssl). Maybe it´s good to add this to the document. Well, I know that explaining the use of

Re: Storing current ActionContext in ThreadLocal

2005-03-11 Thread Hubert Rabago
What about using a different class to host the ThreadLocal? public void pojoActionMethod() { ActionContext ctx = ActionContextHolder.getActionContext(); if (...) { ctx.setForwardConfig(ctx.getMapping().findForward("a")); } else { ctx.setForwardConfig(ctx.getMapping().findForward("b"))

Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload

2005-03-11 Thread Dakota Jack
Thanks, Frank. I posted this code in response to Ted's suggestion that this is the way to go to establish a dialogue with the committers on code. -- "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it float on its back." ~Dakota Jack~ -

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload

2005-03-11 Thread dev
Date: 2005-03-11T09:10:32 Editor: DakotaJack Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: StrutsUpload URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/StrutsUpload no comment Change Log: -- @@ -1,78 +1,14 @@ == Overview == -Ut

Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload

2005-03-11 Thread Martin Cooper
I'm not sure how many of the committers relish the idea of reading through about 1,000 lines of completely uncommented code and trying to understand what it all means. And that on a wiki page, rather than in their favourite editor where they would have syntax colouring and could jump around at will

Re: Storing current ActionContext in ThreadLocal

2005-03-11 Thread Joe Germuska
At 10:08 AM -0600 3/11/05, Hubert Rabago wrote: What about using a different class to host the ThreadLocal? public void pojoActionMethod() { ActionContext ctx = ActionContextHolder.getActionContext(); if (...) { ctx.setForwardConfig(ctx.getMapping().findForward("a")); } else { ctx.setFo

Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload

2005-03-11 Thread Dakota Jack
Thanks, Martin, but I think that your suggestion is not related to what I am trying to do. I have gotten rid of code in the last formulation to make this clear. Only the first three interfaces are really important and nothing has changed in those ever. What I am suggesting is using those inter

Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload

2005-03-11 Thread Dakota Jack
There are, in other words, only about 15 lines of code that are relevant: here they are: 1.1.1. MultipartFile public interface MultipartFile extends Serializable { public longgetSize(); public voidsetSize(long fileSize); public String getName(); public void

Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] New: BuildingShale

2005-03-11 Thread Duncan Mills
Fair enough Eugênio send me details directly and I'll be happy to put a note into the Wiki - or you can register and do it yourself :-) Duncan Eugênio Saulo wrote: I´ve had problems with proxy when checking out the modules (report of ... 400 bad request). But the problem was fixed when i changed

Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Joe Germuska
At 8:29 AM -0800 3/11/05, Dakota Jack wrote: Thanks, Frank. I posted this code in response to Ted's suggestion that this is the way to go to establish a dialogue with the committers on code. I would totally endorse Ted's suggestion. The best approach is to publicly document approaches and, where

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Dakota Jack
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:42:20 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 8:29 AM -0800 3/11/05, Dakota Jack wrote: > >Thanks, Frank. I posted this code in response to Ted's suggestion > >that this is the way to go to establish a dialogue with the committers > >on code. > > I would totall

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Hi Joe, I'm not burnt out at this point, and I wouldn't even say bitter. I may have been initially, I am human and so react with emotion, same as anyone. A more objective review of the situation in the intervening time though has lead me to a place where I am a bit frustrated by my inability

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
I feel that Jack is on to something important here... the ability for "outsiders" to work on Struts seems to me an almost impossible task. We are constantly told "make a proposal", "put it up in the Wiki" or "open a ticket with your suggestions", but the problem with that is that we are spendin

[Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: LocalSpellingWords

2005-03-11 Thread dev
Date: 2005-03-11T11:44:06 Editor: 64.105.251.26 Wiki: Apache Struts Wiki Page: LocalSpellingWords URL: http://wiki.apache.org/struts/LocalSpellingWords no comment Change Log: -- @@ -100,3 +100,5 @@ wal

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
I couldn't find it in the archives, but I did find it in my own trash folder... It was actually from Joe, in reply to Hubert, as part of the discussion about what I was doing. As I said, it's not exactly what I did, but it is very much along the same lines, except that it's for the 1.3 branch,

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Joe Germuska
Also, we don't know what you guys are cooking up many times, as evidenced by the addition (I believe it was Martin) made a night or two ago that was along the lines of what I had done but for the 1.3 branch... it seems like my work prompted him to do something similar, and because he could simp

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Joe Germuska wrote: Well, that was me, actually. And there had been lots of prior discussion, as cited by Hubert in three URLs in a message which motivated me to finally do it. That prior discussion dates back more than a year. Yep, I found it in my trash folder. Sorry for the confusion! :) I

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Hubert Rabago
Hi Frank, I've been participating in discussions about the feature you proposed since last year, and I've been looking to participate in its inclusion into Struts. > As you said, there did seem to be a lot of support for an idea along the > lines of what I did, so it seemed like something that sh

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread dbrosius
Quoting "Frank W. Zammetti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > As much as I hate to say it, sometimes engineers being project managers > is a bad idea. Perhaps open-source community-driven development > projects should come to that conclusion and separate the project > managers from the developers. Ju

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Dakota Jack
I am not interested in having an upload application accepted by Struts. Why would I be interested in that? The lack of interest is in making Struts accommodate these differences with the way it handles multipart request processing. I changed the application to accommondate that and the entirety

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Project management in itself isn't a bad thing, but a very good thing. It's when > the project managers are perceived to be the bosses of development, instead of > its secretaries, that there's a problem. I think there are folks who could > contribute alot to open sour

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Dakota Jack
+42 On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:59:46 -0500, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Project management in itself isn't a bad thing, but a very good > thing. It's when > > the project managers are perceived to be the bosses of development, > instead of > > its se

Re: Approaches to Contributing to Struts (Re: [Apache Struts Wiki] Updated: StrutsUpload)

2005-03-11 Thread Frank W. Zammetti
Hubert Rabago wrote: Joe most recently mention this sometime last month: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=struts-dev&m=110842402707799&w=2 Yep, I was involved in that thread :) The one thing I will say is that the whole discussion of "view controllers" and "page prep" is really different than wha

Re: Storing current ActionContext in ThreadLocal

2005-03-11 Thread Hubert Rabago
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:22:54 -0600, Joe Germuska <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > At 10:08 AM -0600 3/11/05, Hubert Rabago wrote: > >What about using a different class to host the ThreadLocal? > > > It seems arbitrary to me, and more of a burden than simply having a > public static ThreadLocal which

Re: Storing current ActionContext in ThreadLocal

2005-03-11 Thread Paul Speed
Joe Germuska wrote: So, I was just about to add support for static access to the "current" ActionContext using ThreadLocal, and then I realized that this approach is more commonly used with classes than with interfaces. Since ActionContext is an interface, we'd have to do something like this: p