DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36859] New: - bean:write tag does not implement getAsText

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36859] - bean:write tag does not implement getAsText

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36859] - bean:write tag does not implement getAsText

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Nightly builds - Status -- READ THIS

Please take a look at this: http://people.apache.org/~jmitchell/docs/ Unless someone says otherwise, I am planning to add to the nightly build a process that zips up the documentation generated by 'maven multiproject:site' in current/site (which are generated to current/ site/target/docs)

svn commit: r292512 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk: project.properties tiles/project.properties

Author: jmitchell Date: Thu Sep 29 12:04:55 2005 New Revision: 292512 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=292512&view=rev Log: remove sandbox/tiles from multiproject:site since there are test failures during the jcoverage testing, fix for changelog factory Added: struts/sandbox/trunk/tile

Re: Nightly builds - Status -- READ THIS

From: "James Mitchell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> I am planning to put our documentation under the following: (left nav pane from the main site) Apache Struts Project Welcome Who We Are Announcements Struts 1.2.x<-- documentation from STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH Struts 1.2.7<-- documentation as wa

Re: Proposed DynaActionForm enhancement

Anyone get a chance to look at this? I plan to use this functionality one way or another, and right now I either have to deploy a locally modified Struts build or use some pretty ugly hacks to bolt it onto an unmodified Struts. If getting this into Struts Core isn't going to be an option, I'd

Re: Proposed DynaActionForm enhancement

Laurie, I'm curious... looking at the patch it seems like your only modifying DynaActionForm, correct? If that's true, since you can set the class for an ActionForm in struts-config, what makes it so that you can't just set LauriesDynaActionForm instead of DynaActionForm? Including CGLIB in your

Re: Proposed DynaActionForm enhancement

The patch is actually modifying DynaActionFormClass -- the class that provides the factory method Struts uses to instantiate a DynaActionForm. There's on direct way to tell Struts to use a different implementation of this class. So, to do this as an extension, you have to: 1) configure a custo

Re: Proposed DynaActionForm enhancement

Thanks for the explanation :) It does seem like a nice enhancement, I hope it will be considered. Frank Laurie Harper wrote: The patch is actually modifying DynaActionFormClass -- the class that provides the factory method Struts uses to instantiate a DynaActionForm. There's on direct way to

svn commit: r292626 - /struts/site/trunk/project.properties

Author: jmitchell Date: Thu Sep 29 21:29:37 2005 New Revision: 292626 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=292626&view=rev Log: shale pom layout is failing for multiproject:site Modified: struts/site/trunk/project.properties Modified: struts/site/trunk/project.properties URL: http://svn.a