[ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts committer: Rich Feit

Please join me in welcoming Rich Feit as a new Struts committer. Rich is a Beehive committer and PMC member. In addition to being a Struts user for years (Beehive is built on Struts), he has been pivotal in designing and coding Struts Ti, both the initial annotationed Beehive version and the cu

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] New Struts committer: Rich Feit

Welcome aboard sailor! -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 Skpe: jmitchtx On Dec 18, 2005, at 4:06 PM, Don Brown wrote: Please join me in welcoming Rich Feit as a new Struts committer. Rich is a Beehive committer and PMC member. In addition to being a Struts user for years (Beehive is built on

svn commit: r357515 - /struts/el/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BRANCH/project.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Sun Dec 18 13:58:17 2005 New Revision: 357515 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357515&view=rev Log: Added missing tags around . These are hints for generating the Maven 2 pom, doesn't exist in the Maven 1 project model. Modified: struts/el/branches/STRUTS_1_2_BR

Bugzilla config

I added a comment on Bug 33202, and it looks like the email only went to Joe. (The bug is assigned to him.) Shouldn't the emails always go to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks, -- Wendy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For ad

Bug report for Struts [2005/12/18]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33202] - DispatchChainAction needs review

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Bugzilla config

On 12/18/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I added a comment on Bug 33202, and it looks like the email only went > to Joe. (The bug is assigned to him.) Shouldn't the emails always go > to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I believe this happened because Joe assigned the bug to himself. The defaul

Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction

On bugs 33202 and 33996 there is a proposal to remove ChainAction and DispatchChainAction. If we're going to do it before 1.3, now is the time. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33202 http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33996 I started a trivial example app to try o

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37717] - struts-el-1.2.8.jar invalid in apache repsitory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction

On 12/18/05, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On bugs 33202 and 33996 there is a proposal to remove ChainAction and > DispatchChainAction. If we're going to do it before 1.3, now is the > time. > > http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33202 > http://issues.apache.org/bugzill

Re: Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction

On 12/18/05, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > We're using ChainAction (I'm not a fan of Dispatch* ;) with Struts 1.2.8, > where we don't have the luxury of the parameter mechanism for mapping > actions to commands. While having this available in 1.3.x would slightly > ease migration for

svn commit: r357591 - in /struts/extras/trunk/src/java/org/apache/struts/actions: ChainAction.java DispatchChainAction.java

Author: wsmoak Date: Sun Dec 18 16:49:43 2005 New Revision: 357591 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357591&view=rev Log: Removing ChainAction and DispatchChainAction as discussed on the dev list. Bug: 33202 Reported By: Joe Germuska Removed: struts/extras/trunk/src/java/org/apache/strut

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33996] - ChainAction does not support non-default catalogs

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33202] - DispatchChainAction needs review

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r357600 - in /struts/sandbox/trunk/ti/phase1/jars/legacy/src/java/org/apache/ti/legacy: LegacyObjectFactory.java PlugInInterceptor.java

Author: mrdon Date: Sun Dec 18 17:13:39 2005 New Revision: 357600 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357600&view=rev Log: Adding an interceptor that supports Struts Action 1.x-style PlugIn classes, adding an object factory that passes the servlet context to interested interceptors Added:

svn commit: r357650 - in /struts/apps/trunk/blank/src/webapp/WEB-INF: struts-config.xml web.xml

Author: wsmoak Date: Sun Dec 18 22:04:03 2005 New Revision: 357650 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=357650&view=rev Log: Use the chain config file from Tiles with the ComposableRequestProcessor (instead of using the TilesRequestProcessor.) Modified: struts/apps/trunk/blank/src/webapp/W