DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38707] New: - provide better error message for "No valid collection specified for size tag"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38707] - provide better error message for "No valid collection specified for size tag"

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r378911 - in /struts/site/trunk/xdocs: index.xml kickstart.fml

Author: husted Date: Sun Feb 19 07:30:40 2006 New Revision: 378911 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378911&view=rev Log: Kickstart FAQ * Add entries about choosing a technology for new development Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml struts/site/trunk/xdocs/kickstart.fml M

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

Have you looked at the actual code? And have you looked at what a CoR pattern is? The actual code is not a CoR pattern. I am not interested in "hooking" anyone, by the way, and so you don't need to "bite". I guess saying you'll "bite" is like saying I am "fishing" for bullshit. That is not true

svn commit: r378917 - in /struts/site/trunk/xdocs: helping.fml index.xml kickstart.fml

Author: husted Date: Sun Feb 19 08:15:52 2006 New Revision: 378917 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378917&view=rev Log: Kickstart, Helping, and Welcome * Tweaks and typos. Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/helping.fml struts/site/trunk/xdocs/index.xml struts/site/trunk/xdocs/k

Re: Weird ClassCastException

One other thing. I believe we should change the suite() method in AbstractJsfTestCase to return new TestSuite(). I had an abstract test class of my own that extended AbstractJsfTestCase but I didn't have the suite method thinking - hey this is abstract anyways so what is there to test. Well mave

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

Dakota Jack wrote: ? I am not interested in "hooking" anyone, by the way, and so you don't need to "bite". I guess saying you'll "bite" is like saying I am "fishing" for bullshit. That is not true. Isn't it interesting how you always managed to read into comments like that some derisive con

svn commit: r378932 - /struts/site/trunk/xdocs/volunteers.xml

Author: gvanmatre Date: Sun Feb 19 09:58:15 2006 New Revision: 378932 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378932&view=rev Log: Fixed typo. Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/volunteers.xml Modified: struts/site/trunk/xdocs/volunteers.xml URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/site/trun

svn commit: r378934 - /struts/shale/trunk/xdocs/features-reusable-views.xml

Author: gvanmatre Date: Sun Feb 19 10:03:05 2006 New Revision: 378934 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378934&view=rev Log: Updated a couple sections on clay options and reuse features. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/xdocs/features-reusable-views.xml Modified: struts/shale/trunk/xdocs/fe

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35703] - [tiles] TilesUtilImpl doInclude() should call TilesRequestProcessor doInclude()... but it doesn't

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

On 2/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anyone can quote chapter and verse from the GoF book. Can you instead > explain *why* what's in Struts isn't CoR? And, perhaps more > importantly, explain why, even if it isn't an exact match for the > pattern, it matters one bit? By the

Bug report for Struts [2006/02/19]

+---+ | Bugzilla Bug ID | | +-+ | | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38542] - [shale] clay not handling binding attribute correctly

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

svn commit: r378988 - /struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/component/ValidatorScript.java

Author: gvanmatre Date: Sun Feb 19 16:32:17 2006 New Revision: 378988 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378988&view=rev Log: Fix for bug# 38593 - ValidatorScript does not find validators in facets. Modified: struts/shale/trunk/core-library/src/java/org/apache/shale/component/ValidatorSc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38593] - [shale] ValidatorScript does not find validators in facets

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37792] - Two symbols cannot share the same 'prefix'

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37800] - Loading full view XML templates on startup

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 37615] - Clay attributes are not using xml namespaces

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38482] - [shale] clay enhancement - reusable clay components

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Weird ClassCastException

On 2/19/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One other thing. I believe we should change the suite() method in > AbstractJsfTestCase to return new TestSuite(). > > I had an abstract test class of my own that extended > AbstractJsfTestCase but I didn't have the suite method thinking -

svn commit: r378996 - /struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/base/AbstractJsfTestCase.java

Author: craigmcc Date: Sun Feb 19 17:13:21 2006 New Revision: 378996 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=378996&view=rev Log: Create an empty TestSuite instead of one that analyzes AbstractJsfTestCase for test methods (there will not be any). Modified: struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/sr

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

On 2/19/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone can quote chapter and verse from the GoF book. Can you instead > > explain *why* what's in Struts isn't CoR? And, perhaps more > > importantly, explain why, even if it

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

On 2/19/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The next step would be to provide customizable chains per Action (becoming > even more like how you configure actions in WebWork) -- but you can even > do > that today by using an Action that itself executed a chain. Craig, isn't that what

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

Does "MyCommand" represent a chain in MyCatalog? If so, while I wouldn't presume to speak for Craig, it sure seems like it :) I've personally used the "fire a chain from an Action" in the past, but I can certainly see where this would be very nice. Frank Martin Cooper wrote: On 2/19/06, Cr

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

On 2/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does "MyCommand" represent a chain in MyCatalog? Yep. If so, while I > wouldn't presume to speak for Craig, it sure seems like it :) I've > personally used the "fire a chain from an Action" in the past, but I can > certainly see whe

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

>From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On 2/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti wrote: > > > > Does "MyCommand" represent a chain in MyCatalog? > > > Yep. > > If so, while I > > wouldn't presume to speak for Craig, it sure seems like it :) I've > > personally used the "fire a chain from an A

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38711] New: - MockFacesContext, FaceContext.getCurrentInstance left over

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 38711] - MockFacesContext, FaceContext.getCurrentInstance left over

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

Responses are following of your remarks, Frank. Anyone can quote chapter and verse from the GoF book. Can you instead explain *why* what's in Struts isn't CoR? I assumed you had looked at the code, and in case you had not, encouraged you to do so and even indicated where the problem was by te

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

Why don't you guys just look at the code? It is fairly simple and straightforward. On 2/19/06, Michael Jouravlev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone can quote chapter and verse from the GoF book. Can you instead > > explain *why* wha

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

On 2/19/06, Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/19/06, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Does "MyCommand" represent a chain in MyCatalog? > > > Yep. > > If so, while I > > wouldn't presume to speak for Craig, it sure seems like it :) I've > > personally used the

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

Here is the ChainBase execute method, gentlemen. If you think that is CoR, then I have nothing further to say. This is the real "pattern". It is not even OOP. It merely uses a class as a repository to do C coding. // Documented in Chain interface public boolean execute(Context context

Re: Reasons for 1.3 release

On 2/19/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > If I understand correctly, in CoR pattern a client calls the chain > > head and "the request propagates along the chain until a > > ConcreteHandler object takes responsibility for handling it." (GoF) > > > That's the most importan

svn commit: r379038 - /struts/shale/trunk/test-framework/src/java/org/apache/shale/test/base/AbstractJsfTestCase.java

Author: craigmcc Date: Sun Feb 19 22:51:50 2006 New Revision: 379038 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=379038&view=rev Log: Call FactoryFinder.releaseFactories() at the end of tearDown() in addition to the beginning of setUp() in case test methods are playing fast and loose with JUnit test li