Hi
I have run into a weird problem. When I run my access my application through
Tomcat, accessing index.xml works just fine. Now I am about to put on the
air a test site that has a Apache 2 front end I run into problems. As far as
I can tell this has to do with the mime-type. When I access it thro
Hi
Found a solution. In my index.jsp I now do a jsp:forward instead of a
jsp:redirect.
Med vennlig hilsen
Hermod Opstvedt
Webmaster
Seiling.org/Norlys.org
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Hermod Opstvedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. mars 2006 13:59
Til: 'Struts Developers List'
Emne:
>From: Hermod Opstvedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Hi
>
> Found a solution. In my index.jsp I now do a jsp:forward instead of a
> jsp:redirect.
>
Another option might be to override the default suffix. I think you would
still have to create a mime type for it on your web server but from the web
Author: wsmoak
Date: Sun Mar 19 08:06:31 2006
New Revision: 386985
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386985&view=rev
Log:
For the Maven 1 build, let the version number be inherited from the parent pom,
and use the ${pom.currentVersion} expression rather than explicit versions on
dependencie
Hi
I'll give it a try. One of the things I don't like about the current
workaround is that I have to create a .jsp file for all my links (which does
the forward to the .xml file).
Hermod
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Gary VanMatre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. mars 2006 17:03
Til:
>From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On 3/16/06, Gary VanMatre wrote:
>
> > Under the "Use Cases System Integration Tests"
> > in the 101 release plan I've tested options 1,2,5,6.
>
> Thanks. :) I added Cargo integration, so if you want to use it,
> running the integration tests beco
Author: wsmoak
Date: Sun Mar 19 08:20:36 2006
New Revision: 386992
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=386992&view=rev
Log:
Changed groupId from 'org.apache.tiles' to 'org.apache.struts.tiles' to conform
to the required Maven repository structure.
Requested by Henri Yandell and the Repository
Hi
Worked like a charm - Thanks for the tip. I also added "text/html clayx" as
an entry in mime.types file.
Hermod
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Hermod Opstvedt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. mars 2006 17:11
Til: 'Struts Developers List'
Emne: SV: SV: [shale] Problem serving Clay xm
Author: wsmoak
Date: Sun Mar 19 10:30:17 2006
New Revision: 387012
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387012&view=rev
Log:
Exclude the JSF RI and Creator 2 jars from the shale-dependencies distribution.
Modified:
struts/shale/trunk/build.xml
Modified: struts/shale/trunk/build.xml
URL:
h
m going to wait and
> > see what the nightly builds look like before I tag 1.0.1.
No nightlies for 20060319. I thought that might happen. :)
Craig, my guess is that it died trying to copy derby.jar for the
sql-browser app, and that you need to run 'ant download-dependencies'
once.
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Author: wsmoak
Date: Sun Mar 19 15:56:30 2006
New Revision: 387074
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387074&view=rev
Log:
Switch to version 1.0.1
Modified:
struts/shale/trunk/build/maven2/shale-clay.pom
struts/shale/trunk/build/maven2/shale-core.pom
struts/shale/trunk/build/maven
Author: wsmoak
Date: Sun Mar 19 16:49:17 2006
New Revision: 387090
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387090&view=rev
Log:
Tag for Shale version 1.0.1
Added:
struts/shale/tags/STRUTS_SHALE_1_0_1/
- copied from r387089, struts/shale/trunk/
--
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease101
--
|| 1. |
Author: husted
Date: Sun Mar 19 17:59:56 2006
New Revision: 387104
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387104&view=rev
Log:
Action2 Apps
* Mailreader - Work in progress
** Refactor for "model driven" interface
** Add listener to load database
** Working against WW 2.2.2 RC1 now
Added:
Modified:
struts/sandbox/trunk/action2/apps/mailreader/src/java/mailreader2/MailreaderSupport.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/struts/sandbox/trunk/action2/apps/mailreader/src/java/mailreader2/MailreaderSupport.java?rev=387108&r1=387107&r2=387108&view=diff
=
Following the release plan which is available on the Wiki,
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease101
the Struts Shale v1.0.1 test build has been completed and deployed to
http://svn.apache.org/dist/struts/shale/v1.0.1/
including checksums and signatures, which may be verified against
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Struts Wiki" for change
notification.
The following page has been changed by WendySmoak:
http://wiki.apache.org/struts/ShaleRelease101
--
|| 2. |
This version has received the following votes to date:
Don Brown voted for "GA" quality (binding)
Frank Zammetti voted for "GA" quality (non-binding)
Niall Pemberton voted for "GA" quality (binding)
Unfortunately it has failed to receive the minimum of three PMC member votes
and therefore this
Author: wsmoak
Date: Sun Mar 19 20:25:11 2006
New Revision: 387133
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=387133&view=rev
Log:
Switch to version 1.0.2-SNAPSHOT
Modified:
struts/shale/trunk/build/maven2/shale-clay.pom
struts/shale/trunk/build/maven2/shale-core.pom
struts/shale/trunk/bu
On 3/19/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Once you have had a chance to review this test build, please respond
> with a vote on its quality:
>
> [X] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] General Availability (GA)
My vote is for Alpha quality due to Shale's dependence on a snapshot
of Standalone Tiles.
Is the lack of votes caused by someone voting against it,
or because of non-responsiveness from the PMC members? If's
it the latter, can't we prod them for one?
--- Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This version has received the following votes to date:
>
> Don Brown voted for "GA" q
On 3/19/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is the lack of votes caused by someone voting against it,
> or because of non-responsiveness from the PMC members? If's
> it the latter, can't we prod them for one?
In my case, it's because we (meaning the team at my day job) are at a, um,
On 3/17/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Frank W. Zammetti wrote:
> > On Fri, March 17, 2006 1:48 pm, Don Brown said:
> >> I might as well make this its own proposal: I propose we consolidate
> the
> >> 'extras', 'el', 'taglibs', and 'faces' subprojects under the 'action'
> >> subproje
Craig McClanahan wrote:
I can certainly buy into release consolidation along these four paths. That
being said, separating the source artifacts (and the binary jar files that
result from them) is still useful in terms of clearly articulating
dependencies *within* a particular release. That beco
25 matches
Mail list logo
