On 7/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Author: tmjee
Date: Sat Jul 1 23:36:14 2006
New Revision: 418556
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=418556&view=rev
Log:
WW-1367
- changed the groupId of this maven archetype to 'org.apache.struts2'
I changed this back to 'org.apach
After bringing the Struts 1 blank archetype out of the sandbox, I also
moved the Struts 2 archetype under struts/maven/trunk. The archetypes
will have a separate release cycle from the frameworks, plus they are
maven-specific, so IMO this is where they belong.
Does the JasperReports dependency [
Ok, that worked.
Thanks.
--
James Mitchell
On Jul 2, 2006, at 1:26 AM, Don Brown wrote:
It means your maven build isn't pulling down the latest xwork.
I've found removing it completely from the cache forces maven to
pull it down again.
Don
James Mitchell wrote:
Thanks.
What can w
Thx for the info and cleaning up.
I've got a question, if one alter some stuff in Struts2 archetype, how does one
update the remote repository? Is it mvn install ? I think this will installed
it to the remote repository, am i right?
Tia.
- Original Message
From: Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PR
On 7/2/06, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thx for the info and cleaning up.
I've got a question, if one alter some stuff in Struts2 archetype, how does one
update the remote repository? Is it mvn install ? I think this will installed
it to the remote repository, am i right?
'mvn install'
Does anyone else find this kind of title redudant?
Struts 1 - Core 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT API
We can specify it in the pom. I recommend:
Struts Core 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT API
?
Paul
-
Sneak preview the all-new Yahoo.com. It's not radically different
Can someone add to that page the instructions for setting up Idea projects and
especially the magic incantation needed for it to build one for XWork if you've
got it in parallel with Struts 2...
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://fo
Pat documented it here:
http://confluence.twdata.org/display/WW/Building+with+Maven
On 7/2/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone add to that page the instructions for setting up Idea projects
and especially the magic incantation needed for it to build one for XWork if
you've
What's an "archetype"?
-
Posted via Jive Forums
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=36179&messageID=70902#70902
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
On 7/2/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone else find this kind of title redudant?
Struts 1 - Core 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT API
We can specify it in the pom. I recommend:
Struts Core 1.3.5-SNAPSHOT API
This change results from Don's proposal thread [1] about renaming
Struts Action ->
On 7/2/06, Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What's an "archetype"?
It's a template for a Maven 2 project. Maven has an 'archetype
plugin' that takes user input, such as the package name and artifact
id, (the name of the jar or war,) and sets up a project for you.
Here's the README f
Another thought on the Struts 2 archetype:
Is there going to be any confusion with "Quickstart" vs.
struts2-archetype-quickstart?
Should we rename it struts2-archetype-starter (or something else)?
Thanks,
--
Wendy
-
To unsub
Wendy, thanks. I understand the proposal. Version 1 is already in 1.3.5; so it
doesn't need to be said everytime; the version number is enough to indicate its
version 1.
Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 7/2/06, Paul Benedict
wrote:
> Does anyone else find this kind of title redudant
Ok, so I finally got around to fixing the nightly build for 1.3.x
Since crontab is not running on the zone, (and I don't feel like
asking why on infr@) I'll be kicking these off from my personal box.
This will also allow me to keep a close eye on it.
Next stop -- 2.0.x
--
James Mitchell
It might appear redundant but "Struts 1" is the name rather than
version number and hopefully what people will get used to distinguish
between the two flavours on offer. Its no different than what Sun did
when they introduced Java 2 and who knows where out version numbers
are going to go in the tw
Okay. I guess it doesn't matter, as long as we don't see the title "Struts 2"
with another version besides 2.x :-)
Niall Pemberton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It might appear redundant but
"Struts 1" is the name rather than
version number and hopefully what people will get used to distinguish
bet
On 6/30/06, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
That's a file I put in xwork, but it says it was checked in. I'll look into it
more later when I get home.
Apparently, Maven 2.0.4 will not retrieve updated snapshots if they're
deployed with uniqueVersion=false, so that the version is just
-SN
The new Struts website looks clean and wonderful. Congrats Don on the reorg.
I may have missed the memo, but has anyone discussed having only one total
Struts API doc for 1.x? The M2 javadoc plugin has the ability to do so. And, on
a side note, is there merit to my suggestion?
Paul
Don Brown <
I've got the script ready to publish the nightlies, but I want to
know what everyone wants published (along with any special commands
needed to produce it).
When I execute mvn package, I see the following that I can publish:
./api/target/struts2-api-2.0-SNAPSHOT.jar
./core/target/struts2-cor
On 7/2/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got the script ready to publish the nightlies, but I want to
know what everyone wants published (along with any special commands
needed to produce it).
When I execute mvn package, I see the following that I can publish:
...
Is this all
On 7/2/06, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[
I may have missed the memo, but has anyone discussed having only one total
Struts API doc for 1.x? The M2 javadoc plugin has the ability to do so. And, on
a side note, is there merit to my suggestion?
You did search the archives, right? :)
On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 7/2/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've got the script ready to publish the nightlies, but I want to
know what everyone wants published (along with any special commands
needed to produce it).
When I execute mvn package, I see t
On 7/2/06, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 2, 2006, at 11:41 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
> Ideally we would do assemblies for the example apps rather than put
> the .war files in the snapshot repo,
Sorry? You mean our nightly location is considered a m2 repo? By who?
http://peop
First round of Checkstyle pathes are in JIRA:
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2900
I'd be happy to do another round after these are applied, if time allows
before the next release is rolled. In any case, this addresses around
2,150 issues, give or take a few.
Frank
Frank W. Zamm
+ 1 as well for Struts 1.x and 2.x
>> +1
>
> +1 to which? ;-)
>
> I'm for just calling them Struts 1.x and Struts 2.x, not the Struts2
> version 2.1 idea. We went through that for a while with WebWork, and it
> was confusing.
> -
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
