It would be(if it is at all) in all tags that make an ajax call. The
other way would be to do it in the href attribute directly, but I find
that one more confusing(in that case the parameters would be in the url,
on the other we are using dojo's "postContent" argument for the
request). They ca
I don't think it will be that bad, the new tags should work ok, and the
others are just a few. I know for sure we will have to rewrite the Tree
tag, because they have released a brand new tree.
musachy
Don Brown wrote:
Yes, let's start with bumping up Dojo to 0.4, then apply patches to
upda
On 10/28/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It would be(if it is at all) in all tags that make an ajax call. The
other way would be to do it in the href attribute directly, but I find
that one more confusing(in that case the parameters would be in the url,
on the other we are using d
I can't think of any simple case that wouldn't be solved using a form,
and yes we could use Dojo's for that. The problem is that if you want to
pick just some elements of the form, or some elements from different
forms, or even more than one form, then I think just dojo's "formnode"
won't do.
On 10/28/06, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can't think of any simple case that wouldn't be solved using a form,
and yes we could use Dojo's for that. The problem is that if you want to
pick just some elements of the form, or some elements from different
forms, or even more than on
I see your point. I hadn't think about the ids, and introducing
something to distinguish them would be a mess.
It is overkilling for something that will probably be used in just a few
cases. We could just stick to taking a form id which we will pass to
dojo as well as a filter. They can alway
Hi guys, comments inline
Don Brown wrote:
> Hmm...I don't see any of my replies in those two threads, but maybe
> there was more. Anyways, I took a look at the DWR stuff, and it looks
> pretty cool. My only concern is that is requires too much dwr
> configuration. I wonder if there is a way we
On 10/28/06, Wille Faler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi guys, comments inline
Don Brown wrote:
> Hmm...I don't see any of my replies in those two threads, but maybe
> there was more. Anyways, I took a look at the DWR stuff, and it looks
> pretty cool. My only concern is that is requires too muc
Thanks for that, Niall. I well remember your own patches from many moons ago.
Dominic
> Please join us in welcoming David DeWolf as a new
> Struts committer.
>
> David is a FTP Server and Portals committer, and has
> been submitting
> high quality Struts and Tiles patches since April. As
> a m
Teenage! ohmigod - time flies!
Dominic
> Niall Pemberton ha scritto:
> > I know, not really the done thing - but my
> unreasonable wife and
> > teenage daugther don't seem to think it acceptable
> for me to be
> > attached to a keyboard 24/7!
> >
> > Anyway it gets worse - I took a holiday last w
wow, it is still there :)
On 10/27/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
commandLink was create in 2004, b/c of a RI bug.
I guess (or assume) that it has been fixed there.
works fine w/ MyFaces.
however inside trinidad/adf the commandLink will not work ...
-M
--
Matthias Wessen
the bug,
so can sb apply the patch ?
On 10/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
wow, it is still there :)
On 10/27/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> commandLink was create in 2004, b/c of a RI bug.
> I guess (or assume) that it has been fixed there.
> wor
On 10/26/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey,
two things.
a) is this the right place to ask questions on Struts-Faces, or where ?
It's the right place for dev type questions ... the Struts User list for
user type questions :-).
if so b)
the demos of struts faces show a
> a) is this the right place to ask questions on Struts-Faces, or where ?
It's the right place for dev type questions ... the Struts User list for
user type questions :-).
:) I was more concerned about "Faces stuff" in Struts-dev ;)
Not sure if that lib will be maintained. ;)
In other words
On 10/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the bug,
so can sb apply the patch ?
On 10/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> wow, it is still there :)
What patch? If it's something in the Struts JIRA, add a comment to the issue.
--
Wendy
---
The bug is still in the RI
(1.1._02)
so s:commandLink is not obsolate.
the "bug" in s:commandLink is, that it is not working w/ Trinidad
http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/STR-2966
-M
On 10/28/06, Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/28/06, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
16 matches
Mail list logo
