[X] Beta
Due to WW-1747.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[X] General Availability (GA)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rainer Hermanns aixcept.de> writes:
> both, XWork 2.0.1 and OGNL 2.6.10 were released and are available via
> the maven repository at OpenSymphony.com.
> I already updated the core/pom.xml for branch 2.0.X and trunk.
>
> One note for others using the OGNL dependency: The groupId changed to
> ope
Nate,
only WW-1615[1] was resolved...
We already released version 2.6.11 cause there were some confusions
after the initial code migration of OGNL to the SVN repo at OpenSymphony.
For the next release, a lot more issues will be addressed.
hth,
Rainer
[1] https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/W
Hi.
I encounter a problem using Struts as a filter on Resin.
Before I try to investigate further, may somebody explain me why a
Filter has been choosen instead of an action as it was for Struts1 ?
I understand that SiteMesh is implemented as a Filter, but for Struts
Action, I don't understand.
There a lot of reasons. If you really want to know, try searching the webwork
mailing list/forum archives, or ask here and I'll try to find time to explain.
Otherwise, just keep trying to solve your problem and avoid using the Servlet -
it's not recommended :)
---
[ x ] General Availability (GA)
On 2/19/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Struts 2.0.6 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-206.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.0.6/
Maven 2 staging re
On Tue, February 20, 2007 4:42 pm, Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> Hi Frank, I've taken this discussion offline if you don't mind, but if
> you like we can bring ig back to the list. We had this argument
> before, my reasons are the same.
Let's go ahead and bring it back to the list, ok? It's a worth-
On Tue, February 20, 2007 4:54 pm, Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> Oh, and by the way while we are on the s2 topic: combining action +
> form in one class which reinstantiates every request is a pretty
> stupid thing if you ask me and is much farther from original Struts
> session-scoped-by-default Acti
On Tue, February 20, 2007 5:20 pm, Michael Jouravlev wrote:
> Oops, did not mean it to sound like that, I am sorry. I forgot that
> you've proposed the same thing for s1.
That's alright because I forgot too :)
> On the other hand, you think that adding new functionality
> to v. 1.4 instead of v.
10 matches
Mail list logo
