Re: [S2] Release process for Struts 2.1.x

2007-09-06 Thread Ted Husted
This looks great, Antonio! Is there any reason why it's labeled for Struts 2.1.x? Could we also try it for 2.0.10? If so, I'll give it a whirl on Sunday (unless someone else would like to give it a try!). We're also still in need of volunteers to shepard the 2.1.0. * http://struts.apache.org/2

[S2] Documentation Changes

2007-09-06 Thread Ted Husted
Since we have a growing list of books and other resources now, I moved those section out of tutorials, and put them on top. * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/home.html With the five S2 books either out-there or known to be in progress, the grand total of Struts-specific books will hit thirty!

Re: [S2] Release process for Struts 2.1.x

2007-09-06 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/9/6, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Is there any reason why it's labeled for Struts 2.1.x? Could we also > try it for 2.0.10? In fact I committed the changes only for the trunk and I did not backport it to the 2_0_X branch. If you want I can merge it to the branch. If so, I'll give i

Re: [S2] Release process for Struts 2.1.x

2007-09-06 Thread Paul Benedict
One thing that is always missing from our release processes is the announcements to portal websites. I don't believe the zoom in downloads for 1.3.8/2.0.8 was a coincidence -- because it was announced very loudly :-) Make sure you also note emailing the announcement to announce.AT.apachenews.org a

Re: [S2] Release process for Struts 2.1.x

2007-09-06 Thread Ted Husted
Perhaps we should add a section listing the "portal websites" to the step-by-step * http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/creating-and-signing-a-distribution.html I believe ApacheNews (an independant entity) feeds from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, which is the cannonical list (that I tend to neglect). We d

Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications?

2007-09-06 Thread Ted Husted
So, for complicated reasons, I'm trying to use Eclipse more these days. Something it likes to do is nag that "The serializable class $classname does not declare a static final serialVersionUID field of type long". Since the Actions are serializable, we get this alot :) A seemingly good explanati

Re: Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications?

2007-09-06 Thread Wes Wannemacher
I've been getting this in Eclipse WTP forever. I ignored it for a while, using quick fix is sort of bad because (if I understand correctly) the point of a serialVersionUID is to create a number that maps to the class's signature so that when de-serializing, a recipient will know if the serialized v

Re: Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications?

2007-09-06 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 9/6/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So, for complicated reasons, I'm trying to use Eclipse more these days. > ;-) > Something it likes to do is nag that "The serializable class > $classname does not declare a static final serialVersionUID field of > type long". > > Since the Acti

Re: Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications?

2007-09-06 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/9/6, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > One of the reasons to generate is to > try to best guess the UID of a previous (serialization compatible) > version that didn't specify the UID. In fact, in JasperReports the UID contains the version number, something like: 20101 (for 2.1.1) Anto

Re: Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications?

2007-09-06 Thread James Mitchell
If you didn't know, you can turn off warnings for just that particular item under preferences. -- James Mitchell On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Ted Husted wrote: So, for complicated reasons, I'm trying to use Eclipse more these days. Something it likes to do is nag that "The serializable

Re: Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications?

2007-09-06 Thread Rahul Akolkar
On 9/6/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/9/6, Rahul Akolkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > > One of the reasons to generate is to > > try to best guess the UID of a previous (serialization compatible) > > version that didn't specify the UID. > > > > In fact, in JasperReports the UI

Re: Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications?

2007-09-06 Thread Paul Benedict
Just add a value of 1. On 9/6/07, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you didn't know, you can turn off warnings for just that > particular item under preferences. > > > -- > James Mitchell > > > > On Sep 6, 2007, at 9:42 AM, Ted Husted wrote: > > > So, for complicated reasons, I'm tr

Re: How can I tell Struts 2 to throw/log exceptions for invalid OGNL Expressions

2007-09-06 Thread Ted Husted
Moving to dev@ It occurred to me that if we make this kind of change, we might want to take the behavior of the text tag/message resources into consideration too. Right now, if a message resource is not found, the tag displays the name of the tag, e.g. renders doesntexist Other tags migh

Re: Hold 2.0.10

2007-09-06 Thread Ian Roughley
Sounds good to me. Ted Husted wrote: So, if everyone is good to go on Struts 2.0.10, I could roll it Sunday night (9 Sep). -Ted. http://husted.com/ted/blog/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands,

Re: [S2] Release process for Struts 2.1.x

2007-09-06 Thread Martin Cooper
On 9/6/07, Paul Benedict <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > One thing that is always missing from our release processes is the > announcements to portal websites. I don't believe the zoom in downloads > for > 1.3.8/2.0.8 was a coincidence -- because it was announced very loudly :-) > > Make sure you al

Re: Should we add serialVersionUID fields for example applications?

2007-09-06 Thread Martin Cooper
On 9/6/07, James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If you didn't know, you can turn off warnings for just that > particular item under preferences. This would be my choice. Think about when instances of these classes are ever going to be serialised anyway - pretty much only when a session i

Re: [S2] Release process for Struts 2.1.x

2007-09-06 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/9/6, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is there any reason why it's labeled for Struts 2.1.x? Could we also > try it for 2.0.10? Ted, sorry to disturb you, but you did not answer if you want me to backport the release plugin configuration to 2_0_X. Antonio --

Re: [S2] Release process for Struts 2.1.x

2007-09-06 Thread Ted Husted
I just wanted to try a dry-run on 2.1.x first, later tonight (after I get some actual work done!). -Ted. On 9/6/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2007/9/6, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Is there any reason why it's labeled for Struts 2.1.x? Could we also > > try it for 2.0.1

Re: SmartURLs (fork of s2: problem with codebehind plugin)

2007-09-06 Thread Ted Husted
On 9/4/07, Brian Pontarelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > BTW, I'm planning on releasing 1.0 of SmartURLs this week and doing some > announcements to lists and such. Are these still plans on pulling that back > into core? I'm trying out 0.14 now. Should there be any problem trying it in an applic

Re: s2: problem with codebehind plugin

2007-09-06 Thread Paul Benedict
No dice yet. I will tell you, I am not using any default package configuration. I don't need that feature. Think that's the problem, Don? Paul

Re: SmartURLs (fork of s2: problem with codebehind plugin)

2007-09-06 Thread Ted Husted
When deploying the SmartUrls plugin, my system is unable to find the class net.java.lang.URLClassLoaderResolver; I tried to google it without success. Can anyone tell me where this class might be found? It's used by the DefaultResultMapBuilder class. -Ted. On 9/6/07, Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTE

Re: [S2] Release process for Struts 2.1.x

2007-09-06 Thread Ted Husted
Does step 2 " Tag the release by using the "release:prepare" goal of Maven:" actually tag the release in SVN? (How does it know what symbol to use?) Or is the word tag being used in another sense? -Ted. On 9/4/07, Antonio Petrelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all > I am in the process of finis

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build (Java 6) build 164 has FAILED (0 tests failed). Change made by Don Brown

2007-09-06 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build (Java 6) has the following 1 change by 1 author: *Don Brown* made the following changes at Comment: Updating classes to match new XWork type conversion API XW-561 > /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/config/BeanSelectionProvider.ja

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build (Java 6) build 166 was SUCCESSFUL (with 705 tests). Change made by Don Brown

2007-09-06 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build (Java 6) has the following 1 change by 1 author: *Don Brown* made the following changes at Comment: Fixing references to xwork type system XW-561 > /struts/struts2/trunk/plugins/config-browser/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/config_browser/ShowBeansAction

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build 511 was SUCCESSFUL (with 705 tests)

2007-09-06 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
This is a manual build of Struts 2 SVN - Main Build. --- All 705 tests passed. Click http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS-MAIN-511 to find out more. Thanks, Bamboo

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build 510 has FAILED (0 tests failed). Change made by Don Brown

2007-09-06 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build has the following 1 change by 1 author: *Don Brown* made the following changes at Comment: Fixing references to xwork type system XW-561 > /struts/struts2/trunk/plugins/config-browser/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/config_browser/ShowBeansAction.java > (

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build (Java 6) build 165 has FAILED (86 tests failed)

2007-09-06 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
This is a manual build of Struts 2 SVN - Main Build (Java 6). --- The build has 86 failed tests and 201 successful tests. Click http://opensource.bamboo.atlassian.com/browse/STRUTS-MAINJ6-165 to find out more.

[OSS Bamboo] Struts 2 SVN - Main Build build 509 has FAILED (0 tests failed). Change made by Don Brown

2007-09-06 Thread Atlassian Open Source Bamboo Integration Server
The project Struts 2 SVN - Main Build has the following 1 change by 1 author: *Don Brown* made the following changes at Comment: Updating classes to match new XWork type conversion API XW-561 > /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/config/BeanSelectionProvider.java > (573