Re: Destroy Of Interceptor

2007-12-16 Thread Ted Husted
+1 I haven't traced the code, but I believe we redeploy the Interceptors in dev mode, making a destroy option more important. On Dec 14, 2007 7:46 PM, Tom Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You know, I think you're right! I searched the entire codebase (both xwork > and struts) and I have

[s2] Build changes

2007-12-16 Thread Don Brown
FYI, I'm working on the XWork and Struts 2 builds, trying to do a few things: * Automatic deployment of xwork and struts 2 snapshots (by Bamboo) * Automatic deployment of struts 2 assemblies (by Bamboo) * One step creation of assemblies, including j4 backport jars One of the stumbling points of

Re: [s2] Build changes

2007-12-16 Thread Martin Gilday
Sounds very useful, especially for people wanting to test out the latest 2.1.x. Does this include getting artifacts published to a snapshot Struts 2 Maven repo (i.e. not central)? - Original message - From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Struts Developers List" Date: Sun, 16 Dec 20

Re: [s2] Build changes

2007-12-16 Thread Don Brown
On 12/17/07, Martin Gilday <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does this include getting artifacts published to a snapshot Struts 2 > Maven repo (i.e. not central)? Yep, and as I mentioned, I'm hoping to get the full assembly builds automatically published as well. Don > > > - Original message

Re: svn commit: r604737 - /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/template/simple/optiontransferselect.ftl

2007-12-16 Thread Don Brown
Don't forget to put the ticket number in the commit, cause that will usually be the bit that has the link to the thread. Don On 12/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Author: davenewton > Date: Sun Dec 16 15:14:16 2007 > New Revision: 604737 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc

Re: svn commit: r604737 - /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/template/simple/optiontransferselect.ftl

2007-12-16 Thread Dave Newton
Oh; didn't know there was a ticket, sorry. d. --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't forget to put the ticket number in the commit, cause that will > usually be the bit that has the link to the thread. > > Don > > On 12/17/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author:

Re: svn commit: r604737 - /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/template/simple/optiontransferselect.ftl

2007-12-16 Thread Don Brown
Heh, that was the no-so-subtle hint :) Don On 12/17/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oh; didn't know there was a ticket, sorry. > > d. > > --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Don't forget to put the ticket number in the commit, cause that will > > usually be the bit that ha

Re: svn commit: r604737 - /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/template/simple/optiontransferselect.ftl

2007-12-16 Thread Dave Newton
--- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Heh, that was the no-so-subtle hint :) Oh, I get it now. I'm kinda slow today. *Simpsons-esque "I will create tickets for bug fixes and enhancements" chalkboard scrawling* d. > > On 12/17/07, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh; didn't know

Re: [struts-dev] svn commit: r604737 - /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/template/simple/optiontransferselect.ftl

2007-12-16 Thread Dale Newfield
Dave Newton wrote: --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Heh, that was the no-so-subtle hint :) Oh, I get it now. I'm kinda slow today. *Simpsons-esque "I will create tickets for bug fixes and enhancements" chalkboard scrawling* It's my fault for being slow. I'm still working through th

Re: [struts-dev] svn commit: r604737 - /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/template/simple/optiontransferselect.ftl

2007-12-16 Thread Dave Newton
--- Dale Newfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Newton wrote: > > --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Heh, that was the no-so-subtle hint :) > > > > Oh, I get it now. I'm kinda slow today. > > > > *Simpsons-esque "I will create tickets for bug fixes and enhancements" > > chalkboard

Re: [struts-dev] svn commit: r604737 - /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/template/simple/optiontransferselect.ftl

2007-12-16 Thread Dale Newfield
Dave Newton wrote: Meh; it's better than it was; for now I'd just as soon leave it just to make sure *something* gets fixed about it, just in case nobody has a chance to do anything with it. I'll back it out if you're dead set, though. There's no impending release, so I guess it doesn't matter

Re: [struts-dev] svn commit: r604737 - /struts/struts2/trunk/core/src/main/resources/template/simple/optiontransferselect.ftl

2007-12-16 Thread Dave Newton
--- Dale Newfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There's no impending release, so I guess it doesn't matter if it sits > for a few days in a slightly different broken state than it's been in > for a while. Thanks for being so pro-active in the first place :-) There are a lot of guard clauses that

Re: [s2] Build changes

2007-12-16 Thread Antonio Petrelli
2007/12/16, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > * One step creation of assemblies, including j4 backport jars This might interest you, I noticed it was not applied: http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-585 One of the stumbling points of the project right now is releases are > still not as easy

Re: [s2] Build changes

2007-12-16 Thread Don Brown
Yep, if you look in the OpenSymphony maven 2 repository, you'll see the -jdk14 jar. I closed the ticket accordingly. I'm working on cleaning up the assembly right now as it is rather out of date. I'm really hoping we can use the release plugin...will make things much easier. Don On Dec 17, 200