My view; If the s:file tag is available from the core jars we need to ship
the dependencies to support it.
If we put on the website the S2 core does something then it should do it out
of the box, it shouldn't be a "Oh, it does half the stuff, but hey, we
couldn't be bothered to roll in the dep
Thanks for the pointer, but I've already created patches.
I think Ted wants someone to help merge them in which is why I'm looking for
some docs (that is unless Ted says "Sure... throw me some more patches" :)).
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Cooper" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
And from looking in the pom.xml I would say it definitely doesn't.
Al.
- Original Message -
From: "Don Brown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: [S2.1] Does struts2-core include Dojo code?
It shouldn't...
Don
On 1
Just to make things more interesting we have entered jar hell :(.
Maven is picking up struts-annotations which has a freemarker-2.3.4
dependency and inserting it into the classpath before the S2.1 specified
2.3.11 dependency thus giving a compile and run classpath of;
m2\repository\f
We've got velocity 1.4 & velocity 1.5 from these two places;
A couple down the chain dependencies are using velocity
We're using org.apache.velocity
and we've also got Struts-1.2.9 directly included as a dependency from
velocity-tools-1.3 using struts and we're using
org.apache.struts.
Hi!
I've been debugging WW-2240 (had to install WebLogic 10 to reproduce
it) and have seen some strange behavior (at least I think so) in
the ActionContext initialization and cleanup performed by the
FilterDispatcher. The problem is that the cleanup of the ActionContext
(ActionContext.setConte
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 14:50 +, Al Sutton wrote:
> Thanks for the pointer, but I've already created patches.
>
> I think Ted wants someone to help merge them in which is why I'm looking for
> some docs (that is unless Ted says "Sure... throw me some more patches" :)).
>
> Al.
>
I wouldn't
Well, that's not exactly what will happen. Core pulls in freemarker
2.3.11, but labels annotations as optional, which means it will not
include 2.3.4 (through transitive dependence).
But regardless, you are right, they need to be the same.
On Jan 20, 2008 5:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Jan 20, 2008 3:03 AM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to make things more interesting we have entered jar hell :(.
>
> Maven is picking up struts-annotations which has a freemarker-2.3.4
> dependency and inserting it into the classpath before the S2.1 specified
> 2.3.11 dependency th
I wouldn't worry about what other projects have. What ultimately
happens (like OO) is the top most dependency declaration wins. This
means you can override anything that a dependent project thinks it
needs.
Dependency management can be a nightmare if projects that are outside
of your control do
Thanks Wendy,
I've tried to raise a MEV, but when I click new all I get is the search bar.
Does the JIRA for Maven require users to have a login :(.
- Original Message -
From: "Wendy Smoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Struts Developers List"
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2008 4:54 PM
Subje
I think you've missed the point.
Because the groupIds are different both sets of jars are included by maven
during compiling and testing, because maven thinks both jars are for
different packages.
I can confirm this is the case by running maven in debug mode and analyzing
the output.
Now,
Sorry if something I said pissed you off.
Those should be brought to the same version:
org.freemarker
freemarker
2.3.11
On Jan 20, 2008 2:37 PM, Al Sutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you've missed the point.
>
> Because the groupId
13 matches
Mail list logo
