Re: [s2] Test build of 2.1.1 available

Don, I tested the current build successfully on my current applications. I'd suggest to call a vote for a beta release. With a broader audience we could quickly clean up existing and coming issues and target a GA release within the next weeks. Before a GA release some issues in XWork need to be r

Fundamental flaw in Model-Driven?

I've been investigating some interesting behavior regarding model-driven actions and found a past thread that covers the situation from late last year: http://www.nabble.com/ModelDriven-CRUD-validation-failure-still-causes-JPA-update-td12987242.html First I outline the problem, then a possible fra

[s2] A thought - next generation OSGi-based?

As I learn more and more about OSGi, I wonder if it might be the solution to several big problems we seem to have at the moment: poor reloadability and the lack of a solid API. With OSGi, you can drop bundles in and out of the system at runtime, even running multiple versions of the same bundle si

Re: [s2] A thought - next generation OSGi-based?

I like your thinking and I'm curious to hear more. Are you referring to something like the OSGi Plugin for loading plugins, or are you saying that you want to make Struts 3 only run in an OSGi container? Matt On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 9:09 AM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I learn more

Re: [s2] A thought - next generation OSGi-based?

I'm also pretty stoked about the possibilities of OSGi; I think it's a potentially Pretty Big Win for all sorts of functionality. I don't know a whole lot about OSGi yet, but it sure seems like a globally-useful tool. I'm all for it; +1. Dave --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As I learn

Re: [s2] A thought - next generation OSGi-based?

Since I started playing with the OSGi plugin this has been on the back of my mind, I think it would be a good idea (support for OSGi is showing up all over the place, I just read somewhere that glassfish will run on an OSGi platform) musachy On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Don Brown <[EMAIL PR

[OT] Sanity-check trunk pom version num

Can someone tell me if I'm nuts and/or my Eclipse/Maven thing is going crazy? What should I get as a plugin snapshot version number in trunk, 2.1.1 or 2.1.2, when building via Maven? Thanks, and *agh*, Dave - To unsubscrib

Re: [OT] Sanity-check trunk pom version num

2.1.2-SNAPSHOT Don On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Can someone tell me if I'm nuts and/or my Eclipse/Maven thing is going crazy? > > What should I get as a plugin snapshot version number in trunk, 2.1.1 or > 2.1.2, when building via Maven? > > Thanks,

Re: [OT] Sanity-check trunk pom version num

Dave Newton wrote: Can someone tell me if I'm nuts and/or my Eclipse/Maven thing is going crazy? What should I get as a plugin snapshot version number in trunk, 2.1.1 or 2.1.2, when building via Maven? Thanks, and *agh*, Dave Right now, at rev 651477: 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT

Re: [OT] Sanity-check trunk pom version num

*Whew* Thanks, guys. Been fighting with a broken Eclipse and/or Maven plugin for too long and going stir-crazy :( Dave --- Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2.1.2-SNAPSHOT > > Don > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:22 PM, Dave Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > Can someone tell me if I'