Chase on 01/05/08 06:04, wrote:
Adam Hardy wrote:
the problem was spurious JPA updates - which can be avoided by putting
an interceptor in between the Validation and the Workflow
interceptors: all it should do is call EntityManager.clear().
if (validationAwareAction.hasErrors()) getEntityM
>
>
>
> Using the JPA extended persistence context (not EJB), the clear() will
> eliminate any changes to the model before JPA comes to flush to the db. I
> assume it would work in an EJB container too.
>
I'm not really sure I get the point your making here, but if you just do not
want the EntityM
Alexander Snaps on 01/05/08 11:30, wrote:
Using the JPA extended persistence context (not EJB), the clear() will
eliminate any changes to the model before JPA comes to flush to the db. I
assume it would work in an EJB container too.
I'm not really sure I get the point your making here, but i
Alexander Snaps on 01/05/08 11:30, wrote:
Using the JPA extended persistence context (not EJB), the clear() will
eliminate any changes to the model before JPA comes to flush to the db. I
assume it would work in an EJB container too.
I'm not really sure I get the point your making here, but i
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Adam Hardy <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexander Snaps on 01/05/08 11:30, wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > Using the JPA extended persistence context (not EJB), the clear() will
> > > eliminate any changes to the model before JPA comes to flush to the
> > > db. I
> > > a
Alexander Snaps on 01/05/08 12:02, wrote:
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:49 PM, Adam Hardy <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alexander Snaps on 01/05/08 11:30, wrote:
Using the JPA extended persistence context (not EJB), the clear() will
eliminate any changes to the model before JPA comes to flush to th
Alexander Snaps on 01/05/08 12:02, wrote:
Entity myEntity = em.find(Entity.class, someId);
oldValue = myEntity.getSomeField(); // this is only for further down in the
mail ;)
myEntity.setSomeField(someValue);
if(!hasError) {
EntityTransaction tx = em.getTransaction();
tx.begin();
tx.comm
Don't really have the context indeed, I haven't been looking into the
Model-Driven and had no clue where this is happening. I just think this is
more correct than doing everything within the tx demarcation. And indeed
many people don't know about the tx.begin - commit in a row thing. I also
keeps e
2008/5/1 Jeromy Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Jay Bose wrote:
>
> > Thanks Antonio, that solved it.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> Just wondering, how does one know that before attempting "mvn
> assembly:assembly", they must run the release,all,alljars,j4 and
> pre-assembly profiles?
> Is it just a matter of d
[ I suspect this is going to break threading Is there a good way to respond
to a message from a digest without breaking threading? )
Adam Hardy on 26/04/08 10:42, wrote:
> I am pulling in what I wrote earlier because I should correct what I said
> about letting entities slip out of scope. Fol
Eric D Nielsen on 01/05/08 14:54, wrote:
[ I suspect this is going to break threading Is there a good way to respond
to a message from a digest without breaking threading? )
I wondered why! Unfortunately you need the message id for threading and I don't
think it is included in the digest,
Am I wrong, or JPA's EntityManager has no support for anything like
evict()? I think this is an Hibernate's Session specific feature...
Alex
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:54 PM, Eric D Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [ I suspect this is going to break threading Is there a good way to
> respo
Yes, you're right. There are also several other things lacking that I would find
useful. But I guess it's still version 1.
Alexander Snaps on 01/05/08 15:35, wrote:
Am I wrong, or JPA's EntityManager has no support for anything like
evict()? I think this is an Hibernate's Session specific feat
I know I am repeating myself, but what is getting in the way of NOT starting
a transaction at all in the case of a validation error... Shoudn't the
transaction be started much later anyways, and only if validation passed?
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:51 PM, Adam Hardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Ye
I'm ready to commit this, but I guess I will wait until Don cuts the
new build. This is how it works:
1. Static content lookup was refactored to DefaultStaticContentLoader
which implements StaticContentLoader.
2. DefaultStaticContentLoader does everything FilterDipatcher did
before, but it also s
Alexander Snaps gmail.com> writes:
> I know I am repeating myself, but what is getting in the way of NOT starting
> a transaction at all in the case of a validation error... Shoudn't the
> transaction be started much later anyways, and only if validation passed?
Because that doesn't solve the pro
We've had a fair amount of issues in the AppFuse project using *.html
as an extension. This is because some plugins and such use *.html
files and Struts attempts to serve them up as Actions rather than
plugins. Will this fix that problem? We've added a StaticFilter[1]
that attempts to fix it, but i
As long as no mapping is found for that *.html, and it is inside one
of the lookup folders (like "static") it should work.
musachy
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:24 PM, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We've had a fair amount of issues in the AppFuse project using *.html
> as an extension. T
Is it possible to configure the lookup folders?
Matt
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As long as no mapping is found for that *.html, and it is inside one
> of the lookup folders (like "static") it should work.
>
> musachy
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 20
Yes, like this:
org.apache.struts2.dispatcher.FilterDispatcher
pathPrefixes
/super_folder
musachy
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is it possible to configure the lookup folders?
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Musa
While I used WebWork-2, and the XWork associated with it, I was able to
programmatically
retrieve action validation using the ActionValidatorManagerFactory.
Now, it seems this class was removed.
Any suggestions on how to programmatically get a ValidatorFactory instance?
The Struts 2.1.2 test build is now available.
Release notes:
* http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/version-notes-212.html
Distribution:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.2/
Maven 2 staging repository:
* http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.2/m2-staging-repository/
Once you have h
Ok, so this time, it took probably two hours to generate the release
all told. The guide is now pretty accurate, but the steps themselves
can take quite a while. This time, I copied my keys, m2 config, etc.
over to a server in the US and ran the release from there, and boy,
what a difference that
23 matches
Mail list logo
