Re: [VOTE] Bring Convention plugin into trunk and deprecate Zero Config

2008-05-31 Thread Musachy Barroso
The only conflict between codebehind and convention is on the UnknownHandler. If struts would support multiple UnknownHandler(s), like it supports multiple PackageProvider(s), we wouldn't have a problem at all, and they could be able to co-exist without knowing anything about each other. Given a re

Re: [VOTE] Bring Convention plugin into trunk and deprecate Zero Config

2008-05-31 Thread dusty
It is an interesting situation. I think its clear that majority of mind share an momentum on the configuration side is with the Convention plugin. REST is hot and so people are going to want to try an use the REST plugin for action invocation. Ideally, we would want the best of both worlds in

[s2] Towards a stable 2.1.x release

2008-05-31 Thread Don Brown
With 2.1.2 beta out the door, I think it is time we consider the branch feature-complete, which means our focus should now be on working out the bugs so we can get a stable, GA-quality 2.1.x release ASAP. I'm going to start going through our tickets and push them around accordingly. At this point

Re: [VOTE] Bring Convention plugin into trunk and deprecate Zero Config

2008-05-31 Thread Don Brown
I agree it is important to present a solid convention and REST solution, and am glad you agree backwards-compatibility is important. For Struts developers, they probably don't care what happens, as long as they can drop the right combination of jars into their application and their application cont