> Do we need a formal vote on this?
>
I don't think we need a vote, more like a consensus (see? I am
learning!), which we seem to have. We can have it in 2.1 as an
experimental feature, like we usually do. I will be doing more testing
on it during the weekend, and then move it out of the sandbox n
Sounds good to me!
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 8:12 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > Do we need a formal vote on this?
> >
>
> I don't think we need a vote, more like a consensus (see? I am
> learning!), which we seem to have. We can have it in 2.1 as an
> experimental feature, like we usually do. I w
Something you can allways do, is to define a parallel set of
getter/setter in your bean with type java.util.Date that internally
does the conversion.
public Date getStartDate() {
return start.toDate();
}
public void setStartDate(Date start) {
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 5:12 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> > Do we need a formal vote on this?
> >
>
> I don't think we need a vote, more like a consensus (see? I am
> learning!), which we seem to have. We can have it in 2.1 as an
> experimental feature, like we usually do. I will be doing more te
Those will need NPE checks by the way.
:)
-bp
On Dec 19, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Miguel wrote:
Something you can allways do, is to define a parallel set of
getter/setter in your bean with type java.util.Date that internally
does the conversion.
public Date getStartDate() {
Be aware that new DateTime(null) results in "now". (go figure..)
So you may want to check the parameter 'Date start' for null.
Ronny
On Dec 19, 2008, at 5:58 PM, Miguel wrote:
Something you can allways do, is to define a parallel set of
getter/setter in your bean with type java.util.Date that
I'm not using either of those myself. We can always move the tickets to a
later release if need be. I wouldn't let the Tiles and Portlet tickets hold
up a 2.1.3 release. I just assigned what I thought were bug tickets to
2.1.3. Anything that was a feature, I assigned to Future.
On Fri, Dec 19, 200
There are a couple of tickets related to porlets plugin and tiles,
scheduled for 2.1.3:
https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=10030&fixfor=21864
can someone with either porltets or tiles experienc
I agree. If nobody can take care of them at the moment, then lets
re-schedule them
musachy
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 3:39 PM, James Holmes wrote:
> I'm not using either of those myself. We can always move the tickets to a
> later release if need be. I wouldn't let the Tiles and Portlet tickets hol
