Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality

2009-01-12 Thread GF
Which freemarker version is included in this struts? On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > The Struts 2.1.6 test build is now available. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additio

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality

2009-01-12 Thread GF
I checked by my self. Luckily you updated to 2.3.13 because previous ones had very big issues about locking and performance http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/versions_2_3_13.html On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 12:43 PM, GF wrote: > Which freemarker version is included in this struts? > > On Mon, Ja

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality

2009-01-12 Thread Al Sutton
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/struts-dev/200805.mbox/%3c92544c510805150723h423f6dedo2b5cbd2c83b4b...@mail.gmail.com%3e Al. GF wrote: I checked by my self. Luckily you updated to 2.3.13 because previous ones had very big issues about locking and performance http://freemarker.sourcefor

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality

2009-01-12 Thread Rene Gielen
+1 GA Although it bugs me a little that I cannot verify cs validation (and currently missing opportunity to dig deeper), it seems like it's just me here, or my setup - so let's roll :) Any volunteers for a slick press summary on the new features, given the vote passes? It should be availabl

[VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality - RESULT

2009-01-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
+1 GA binding: * James Holmes * Rainer Hermanns * Wes Wannemacher * Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik * Musachy Barroso * Rene Gielen +1 GA supporting: * Philip Luppens * Al Sutton * Jeromy Evans * Dusty Pearce * Matt Payne Struts 2.1.6 is now rated at GA, and I will proceeded to copying the f

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality - RESULT

2009-01-12 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Do you want/need help with the announcement? Rene is probably right that we should outline the improvements... I noticed this page sitting around in the wiki - http://struts.apache.org/2.x/docs/release-notes-210.html (it doesn't look much like we've been keeping it up to date) -Wes On Mon, 200

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality - RESULT

2009-01-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: > Do you want/need help with the announcement? Yes, I would need help with that. I will check the files and deploy the site tomorrow. thanks musachy - To unsubscribe, e-ma

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality - RESULT

2009-01-12 Thread Musachy Barroso
Another thing, should we remove 2.1.2 beta from the site? musachy On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote: >> Do you want/need help with the announcement? > > Yes, I would need help with that. I will check the files and de

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality - RESULT

2009-01-12 Thread Mike Watson
Congratulations folks. That's a top effort and I can't wait to get my hands on it. Mike 2009/1/13 Musachy Barroso : > +1 GA binding: > > * James Holmes > * Rainer Hermanns > * Wes Wannemacher > * Nils-Helge Garli Hegvik > * Musachy Barroso > * Rene Gielen > > +1 GA supporting: > > * Philip

Re: [VOTE] Struts 2.1.6 Quality - RESULT

2009-01-12 Thread Wes Wannemacher
Are you talking about the download, or the link? I think the download should be available. Imagine if you worked on a project that used it, then released (before we got to GA) and you need to make some changes. You don't want to put the whole app through QE, just because you can't find the download