Form tag includeContext option

2009-11-02 Thread Nicola de Saint-Aubert
Hi, The tag has a very usefull parameter "includeContext". Since it could shortcut a lot of staff executed by the proxy module, i m currently extending this parameter to the . Here is what I did: In java class' sources: Add Form.includeContext,isIncludeContext(),setIncludeContext(bolean) Add

Re: Form tag includeContext option

2009-11-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
I agree this would be helpful, and it would be easy to fix, can you open a jira ticket for it? thanks musachy On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Nicola de Saint-Aubert wrote: > > > Hi, > > The tag has a very usefull parameter "includeContext". Since it > could shortcut a lot of staff executed by t

RE: Form tag includeContext option

2009-11-02 Thread Nicola de Saint-Aubert
I did it It s working. How to i open a jira ticket ? Nicolas -Mensaje original- De: Musachy Barroso [mailto:musa...@gmail.com] Enviado el: lunes, 02 de noviembre de 2009 18:42 Para: Struts Developers List Asunto: Re: Form tag includeContext option I agree this would be helpful, and it

Re: Form tag includeContext option

2009-11-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
http://struts.apache.org/helping.html#patches On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Nicola de Saint-Aubert wrote: > I did it It s working. > > How to i open a jira ticket ? > > > Nicolas > > -Mensaje original- > De: Musachy Barroso [mailto:musa...@gmail.com] > Enviado el: lunes, 02 de noviembre

Re: Form tag includeContext option

2009-11-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
Fixed in trunk. https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3312 thanks for reporting. On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > http://struts.apache.org/helping.html#patches > > On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Nicola de Saint-Aubert > wrote: >> I did it It s working. >> >> How t

JSONPlugin breaks in 2.1.8.1

2009-11-02 Thread David C. Hicks
I've been trying to build our application using the 2.1.8.1 candidate. There was an older bug that we needed the fix for. That problem seems to be resolved. However, I find that the JSONPlugin for Struts from Googlecode is broken due to an upgrade of the XWork2 framework. There is a class (com.

Re: JSONPlugin breaks in 2.1.8.1

2009-11-02 Thread Wes Wannemacher
We moved that plugin into Apache... Poke around the 2.1.8.1, you'll find a struts2-json-plugin in there. It's a port of the one on googlecode, so it should be a compatible replacement (a few package names changed, but that should be easy to sort out). -Wes On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, David C.

Re: JSONPlugin breaks in 2.1.8.1

2009-11-02 Thread David C. Hicks
Thanks, Wes! Wes Wannemacher wrote: > We moved that plugin into Apache... Poke around the 2.1.8.1, you'll > find a struts2-json-plugin in there. It's a port of the one on > googlecode, so it should be a compatible replacement (a few package > names changed, but that should be easy to sort out). >

Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance

2009-11-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
Chris, I wanted to double check on this, are you using Ognl 2.7.3 without Javassist? I get class loading errors without it. Please note that xwork contains an embedded version of javassist by mistake. musachy On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Chris Pratt wrote: > That may be only for the compilat

Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance

2009-11-02 Thread Chris Pratt
Oops, I must not have looked close enough, I'm using OGNL 2.7.3 with javassist-3.7.0.jar. (*Chris*) On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Chris, I wanted to double check on this, are you using Ognl 2.7.3 > without Javassist? I get class loading errors without it. Please note

Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance

2009-11-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
It would be sweet if javassist was optional in OGNL, specially considering that we do not use it. I will resist the temptation to vent my frustrations with OGNL here :) (and to fork it as well) musachy On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Chris Pratt wrote: > Oops, I must not have looked close enough

Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance

2009-11-02 Thread Chris Pratt
It would be sweeter if OGNL was optional in struts, but that topic has been beaten to death. =8^( (*Chris*) On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > It would be sweet if javassist was optional in OGNL, specially > considering that we do not use it. I will resist the temptation

Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance

2009-11-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
Actually is not as far off as it sounds. Using the parameters-binder branch and mvel branch in xwork you get a half working showcase. I just need to get myself to do it :) musachy On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Chris Pratt wrote: > It would be sweeter if OGNL was optional in struts, but that to

Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance

2009-11-02 Thread Chris Pratt
I know it's not as sexy, but at this point I think I'd prefer plain old JSTL EL to work globally. It's much easier to teach my junior programmers a single EL than have to explain where each is appropriate. But maybe that's just me. (*Chris*) On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Musachy Barroso wr

Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance

2009-11-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
Thy are finally adding static method calls finally. I don't use any advanced features from OGNL either, UEL would do just fine for me. On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Chris Pratt wrote: > I know it's not as sexy, but at this point I think I'd prefer plain old JSTL > EL to work globally.   It's mu

Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance

2009-11-02 Thread Chris Pratt
They've had static method calls for a long time, you just had to define them as Functions in the TLD. Have they added something else new? (*Chris*) On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote: > Thy are finally adding static method calls finally. I don't use any > advanced features

Re: ognl 2.7.3 performance

2009-11-02 Thread Musachy Barroso
I think I saw it in someone's blog but now I can't find it..did I make this up? Anyway, I am out of pet projects, so I might just play with a UEL plugin :) musachy On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Chris Pratt wrote: > They've had static method calls for a long time, you just had to define them >