Hi,
The tag has a very usefull parameter "includeContext". Since it
could shortcut a lot of staff executed by the proxy module, i m currently
extending this parameter to the .
Here is what I did:
In java class' sources:
Add Form.includeContext,isIncludeContext(),setIncludeContext(bolean)
Add
I agree this would be helpful, and it would be easy to fix, can you
open a jira ticket for it?
thanks
musachy
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:14 AM, Nicola de Saint-Aubert
wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> The tag has a very usefull parameter "includeContext". Since it
> could shortcut a lot of staff executed by t
I did it It s working.
How to i open a jira ticket ?
Nicolas
-Mensaje original-
De: Musachy Barroso [mailto:musa...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: lunes, 02 de noviembre de 2009 18:42
Para: Struts Developers List
Asunto: Re: Form tag includeContext option
I agree this would be helpful, and it
http://struts.apache.org/helping.html#patches
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Nicola de Saint-Aubert
wrote:
> I did it It s working.
>
> How to i open a jira ticket ?
>
>
> Nicolas
>
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Musachy Barroso [mailto:musa...@gmail.com]
> Enviado el: lunes, 02 de noviembre
Fixed in trunk. https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-3312
thanks for reporting.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> http://struts.apache.org/helping.html#patches
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Nicola de Saint-Aubert
> wrote:
>> I did it It s working.
>>
>> How t
I've been trying to build our application using the 2.1.8.1 candidate.
There was an older bug that we needed the fix for. That problem seems
to be resolved. However, I find that the JSONPlugin for Struts from
Googlecode is broken due to an upgrade of the XWork2 framework. There
is a class (com.
We moved that plugin into Apache... Poke around the 2.1.8.1, you'll
find a struts2-json-plugin in there. It's a port of the one on
googlecode, so it should be a compatible replacement (a few package
names changed, but that should be easy to sort out).
-Wes
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:54 PM, David C.
Thanks, Wes!
Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> We moved that plugin into Apache... Poke around the 2.1.8.1, you'll
> find a struts2-json-plugin in there. It's a port of the one on
> googlecode, so it should be a compatible replacement (a few package
> names changed, but that should be easy to sort out).
>
Chris, I wanted to double check on this, are you using Ognl 2.7.3
without Javassist? I get class loading errors without it. Please note
that xwork contains an embedded version of javassist by mistake.
musachy
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 8:46 AM, Chris Pratt wrote:
> That may be only for the compilat
Oops, I must not have looked close enough, I'm using OGNL 2.7.3 with
javassist-3.7.0.jar.
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Chris, I wanted to double check on this, are you using Ognl 2.7.3
> without Javassist? I get class loading errors without it. Please note
It would be sweet if javassist was optional in OGNL, specially
considering that we do not use it. I will resist the temptation to
vent my frustrations with OGNL here :) (and to fork it as well)
musachy
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 4:42 PM, Chris Pratt wrote:
> Oops, I must not have looked close enough
It would be sweeter if OGNL was optional in struts, but that topic has been
beaten to death. =8^(
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:13 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> It would be sweet if javassist was optional in OGNL, specially
> considering that we do not use it. I will resist the temptation
Actually is not as far off as it sounds. Using the parameters-binder
branch and mvel branch in xwork you get a half working showcase. I
just need to get myself to do it :)
musachy
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Chris Pratt wrote:
> It would be sweeter if OGNL was optional in struts, but that to
I know it's not as sexy, but at this point I think I'd prefer plain old JSTL
EL to work globally. It's much easier to teach my junior programmers a
single EL than have to explain where each is appropriate. But maybe that's
just me.
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:06 PM, Musachy Barroso wr
Thy are finally adding static method calls finally. I don't use any
advanced features from OGNL either, UEL would do just fine for me.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 7:20 PM, Chris Pratt wrote:
> I know it's not as sexy, but at this point I think I'd prefer plain old JSTL
> EL to work globally. It's mu
They've had static method calls for a long time, you just had to define them
as Functions in the TLD. Have they added something else new?
(*Chris*)
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> Thy are finally adding static method calls finally. I don't use any
> advanced features
I think I saw it in someone's blog but now I can't find it..did I make
this up? Anyway, I am out of pet projects, so I might just play with a
UEL plugin :)
musachy
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Chris Pratt wrote:
> They've had static method calls for a long time, you just had to define them
>
17 matches
Mail list logo