Hi,
As I understood, the Vote should be cancelled as only Musachy gave
positive answer. I'm not a PMC so my vote doesn't cunt at the end. Am
I right? Or should I wait?
Regards
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
-
To unsubscri
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> As I understood, the Vote should be cancelled as only Musachy gave
> positive answer. I'm not a PMC so my vote doesn't count at the end. Am
> I right? Or should I wait?
I just re-checked and there are still no .asc signature files in the
sta
2010/1/5 Wendy Smoak :
> I just re-checked and there are still no .asc signature files in the
> staging repo, so this cannot be released as-is.
I found the problem - .asc files were only generated for
struts2-archetype-plugin and struts2-archetype-starter. The reset is
missing below entry in pom.x
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Lukasz Lenart
wrote:
> 2010/1/5 Wendy Smoak :
>> I just re-checked and there are still no .asc signature files in the
>> staging repo, so this cannot be released as-is.
>
> I found the problem - .asc files were only generated for
> struts2-archetype-plugin and strut
you can download the files from the repo and sign it/generate
checksums..but!..this happened before and there was a long discussion
over if it was right or not and so on. You can either:
1. sign the files/generate checksums locally and upload them
2. do the release again
I'd say #1, considering h
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:18 PM, Musachy Barroso wrote:
> you can download the files from the repo and sign it/generate
> checksums..but!..this happened before and there was a long discussion
> over if it was right or not and so on.
Do not do this. If you download the files, you have no way of kn
2010/1/5 Martin Cooper :
> Do not do this. If you download the files, you have no way of knowing
> if they are the same ones you put there. They could have been
> corrupted, deliberately or otherwise, in the interim, and without
> signatures you cannot verify what you have (which is why we want the
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
[snip]
> ... If you download the files, you have no way of knowing
> if they are the same ones you put there...
No way of knowing... except the checksums :)
-Wes
--
Wes Wannemacher
Head Engineer, WanTii, Inc.
Need Training? Struts, Spring,
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Wes Wannemacher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
> [snip]
>> ... If you download the files, you have no way of knowing
>> if they are the same ones you put there...
>
> No way of knowing... except the checksums :)
You mean the checksu
On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Martin Cooper wrote:
>
> You mean the checksums that you download from the same
> potentially-corrupted server? Good plan! :-p
>
No, I mean the checksums sitting on your own hard drive right next to
the rest of the files generated during the release process.
I gue
Wendy
Could you check struts2-archetype-portlet?
http://people.apache.org/builds/struts/2.1.8.1/m2-staging-repository/org/apache/struts/struts2-archetype-portlet/2.1.8.1/
Thanks in advance
--
Lukasz
http://www.lenart.org.pl/
http://javarsovia.pl
-
2009/12/28 Paul Benedict :
> My fault for not being clear. I was intending to say XWork should be a
> "child module" (in the Maven sense) so it's actually part of Struts2
> build and versioning process.
Any news? I would like to start some refactoring in Xwork and it will
be nice to know where we
12 matches
Mail list logo
