Bye Bye Maurizio Committer, Welcome Maurizio PMC Member :-)
Kind regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
2011/10/18 :
> Author: mcucchiara
> Date: Tue Oct 18 08:05:20 2011
> New Revision: 1185523
>
> URL: http://svn.
2011/10/18 Łukasz Lenart :
> Bye Bye Maurizio Committer, Welcome Maurizio PMC Member :-)
Congrats Maurizio!
I actually had the impression you were already on the Struts PMC - you
deserved it :-)
Cheers
Christian
>
>
> Kind regards
> --
> Łukasz
> + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
> Warsz
Łukasz Lenart wrote:
>
> Bye Bye Maurizio Committer, Welcome Maurizio PMC Member :-)
>
Gongratulations Maurizio!
And thank you for your great work on Struts2 in the past month.
Johannes
-
web: http://www.jgeppert.com
twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep
--
View this message in context:
ht
I agree to Łukasz we should follow the MAJOR.MINOR.MAINTENANCE.PATCH scheme,
because this is what the users understand and expect.
But maybe we should also think about a new Brand like Struts NG like
suggested by Rene.
Because many developers and media associate with the Brand Struts the old
Stru
Definitely +1 for the naming convention
> I don't know if "Struts NG" is the right name for the new brand but we should
> not use a version number in the brand.
I agree with Johannes, this time we should strongly consider to keep
away the version number from the brand.
Honestly, I am afraid that N
Well, the Struts NG reference in my mail was meant to recall our naming
discussions when the merger between Struts and WebWork took place. We
decided against it, and I think it's too late now to go that way - what
came out as Struts 2 was actually the "Next Generation", something
breaking - now we'
2011/10/18 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> BTW, I think It might be interesting to know how many users are still
> using Struts 1.
A lot, banks are the top most users ;-)
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
Warszawa JUG conference - Confitura http://confitura.pl/
--
nobody.
2011-10-18
hiyoucai
发件人: Łukasz Lenart
发送时间: 2011-10-18 18:35
主 题: Re: Deprecate 2.1 version
收件人: Struts Developers List
2011/10/18 Maurizio Cucchiara :
> BTW, I think It might be interesting to know how many users are still
> using Struts 1.
A lot, banks are the top most us
2011/10/18 Rene Gielen :
> We made "Struts 2" a brand, the basic question seems to be - do we want
> to rebrand or not? If we do rebrand, I think the logical way is to call
> it "Struts 3". But we have to be aware that this causes some other
> problems. Is a Struts 2 book good for learning Struts 3
Am 18.10.11 00:45, schrieb Łukasz Lenart:
> 2011/10/18 Rene Gielen :
>> We made "Struts 2" a brand, the basic question seems to be - do we want
>> to rebrand or not? If we do rebrand, I think the logical way is to call
>> it "Struts 3". But we have to be aware that this causes some other
>> problem
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Rene Gielen wrote:
> Am 18.10.11 00:45, schrieb Łukasz Lenart:
>> 2011/10/18 Rene Gielen :
>>> We made "Struts 2" a brand, the basic question seems to be - do we want
>>> to rebrand or not? If we do rebrand, I think the logical way is to call
>>> it "Struts 3". But
Good day Struts Developers:
I have enjoyed reading your conversation about the Struts brand. I believe the
"Struts" brand-name is one of the most valuable in the web-framework space.
There is something comforting and reassuring to developers about the simplicity
of the "Struts" brand-name.
I agree with deprecating older branches of 2.x and with the proposed
versioning scheme.
As far as the name goes, that's a tough call. I'd stick with Struts 2 until
the API is changed in a major way or we run out of version numbers. Struts 3
is possible, but just pushes the problem into the future.
13 matches
Mail list logo
