Re: Starting work on 2.5

Been using struts with jdk1.7.0_xx for ages and no issues. ... After April 2015, Oracle will no longer post updates of Java SE 7 to its public download sites. Cheers Greg On 25 May 2015 at 10:23, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > 2015-05-15 15:08 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > > Finally struts-archive was m

Re: Starting work on 2.5

2015-05-26 9:36 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > Been using struts with jdk1.7.0_xx for ages and no issues. Thanks Greg! Just wondering if someone is using JDK6 these days? :) JDK7 is out of business now so maybe it's a good idea to support the last out-of-public-updates version which means JDK7 Regards

Re: Starting work on 2.5

+1 for JDK7 # web: http://www.jgeppert.com twitter: http://twitter.com/jogep 2015-05-26 9:39 GMT+02:00 Lukasz Lenart : > 2015-05-26 9:36 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber : > > Been using struts with jdk1.7.0_xx for ages and no issues. > > Thanks Greg! Just

Re: Starting work on 2.5

one more +1 for jdk7 regards, Christoph This Email was scanned by Sophos Anti Virus

AUTO: Thomas Strasser is out of the office (returning 27/05/2015)

I am out of the office until 27/05/2015. In urgent cases please contact our office (off...@silbergrau.com, +43.732.779169.0). thomas strasser Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Starting work on 2.5" sent on 26.05.2015 9:36:06. This is the only notification you will r

Re: Starting work on 2.5

The best place for big changes is early in the release cycle. I haven't had any runtime issues with JDK7 and Struts. On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Christoph Nenning < christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net> wrote: > one more +1 for jdk7 > > > regards, > Christoph > > This Email was scanned by Sophos An

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts-JDK7-pull-request #29

See Changes: [aaron.johnson] WW-4503 Build Struts with JDK 7 [aaron.johnson] WW-4402 JDK 8: build fails due to missing apt tool -- [...truncated 1686 lines...] Received 0 blocks and 1502

Re: Starting work on 2.5

+1 JDK 7 Cheers, Paul On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Aaron Johnson wrote: > The best place for big changes is early in the release cycle. I haven't had > any runtime issues with JDK7 and Struts. > > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 3:51 AM, Christoph Nenning < > christoph.nenn...@lex-com.net> wrote:

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4503 Build Struts with JDK 7

Github user lukaszlenart commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/39#discussion_r31052042 --- Diff: pom.xml --- @@ -352,7 +353,7 @@ org.apache.struts struts-annotations -

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4503 Build Struts with JDK 7

Github user lukaszlenart commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/39#issuecomment-105588791 It's better to use two dedicated PRs where each addresses just one issue. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appea

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts-JDK6-master #910

See Changes: [Lukasz Lenart] Uses proper version of parent -- [...truncated 11490 lines...] Compression is 0.0% Took 94 ms [JENKINS] Archiving

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4503 Build Struts with JDK 7

Github user lukaszlenart commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/39#discussion_r31053051 --- Diff: pom.xml --- @@ -352,7 +353,7 @@ org.apache.struts struts-annotations -

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4503 Build Struts with JDK 7

Github user lukaszlenart commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/39#issuecomment-105598273 This PRs mixed fixes for two different things :( --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If y

Jenkins build is back to normal : Struts-JDK6-master #911

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts-JDK6-master #912

See Changes: [johgep] WW-4504 - Mark current logging layer as @deprecated and use Log4j2 as default one [johgep] WW-4504 - Mark current logging layer as @deprecated and use Log4j2 as default one [johgep] WW-4504 - Mark current log

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4503 Build Struts with JDK 7

Github user swiftelan commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/39#issuecomment-105621794 I understand. I merged changes from the GitHub mirror to my fork. I didn't know that it would update the existing pull request, that was not my intention. --- If your

[GitHub] struts pull request: WW-4503 Build Struts with JDK 7

Github user swiftelan closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/39 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en

Build failed in Jenkins: Struts-JDK7-master #297

See Changes: [johgep] WW-4504 - Mark current logging layer as @deprecated and use Log4j2 as default one [johgep] WW-4504 - Mark current logging layer as @deprecated and use Log4j2 as default one [johgep] WW-4504 - Mark current log