2015-09-01 12:41 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> The same way interceptors are configured, something like:
>
> publish*
>
> public String publish() {..}
> public String publishNow() {..}
but maybe instead of such simple definition it'd be better to allow
specify very strict regex, ie:
regex:publish(([A-
Probably a good idea to be strict, but I have lots of methods, only use
DMI, so it may get to be a very long element.
Maybe I could prefix all my required methods with something, ie with
allowedPublish() allowedPublishNow() etc
and use :
regex:allowed(([A-Z]?)([a-z]+)?)
I previously added a sa
Maybe public methods and by package name?
mypackage.com
regex:(([A-Z]?)([a-z]+)?)
On 2 September 2015 at 08:09, Lukasz Lenart wrote:
> 2015-09-01 12:41 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> > The same way interceptors are configured, something like:
> >
> > publish*
> >
> > public String publish() {..}
> >
In my apps I would not need to use any patterns. Just a list of methods,
different for each action, would be enough for me.
What do you think about a config switch to enable/disable patterns for
strict-dmi-method-names ?
Reagards,
Christoph
> From: Lukasz Lenart
> To: Struts Developers
2015-09-02 9:55 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> Probably a good idea to be strict, but I have lots of methods, only use
> DMI, so it may get to be a very long element.
>
> Maybe I could prefix all my required methods with something, ie with
> allowedPublish() allowedPublishNow() etc
>
> and use :
>
> rege
2015-09-02 10:01 GMT+02:00 Greg Huber :
> Maybe public methods and by package name?
>
> mypackage.com
> regex:(([A-Z]?)([a-z]+)?)
It will complicate few other things as evaluation of allowed methods
happens on mapping, very early in processing
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenar
2015-09-02 10:18 GMT+02:00 Christoph Nenning :
> In my apps I would not need to use any patterns. Just a list of methods,
> different for each action, would be enough for me.
per or per
> What do you think about a config switch to enable/disable patterns for
> strict-dmi-method-names ?
Origi
> > In my apps I would not need to use any patterns. Just a list of
methods,
> > different for each action, would be enough for me.
>
> per or per
>
That is great! Still looking forward to annotations, at least for actions
:)
> > What do you think about a config switch to enable/disabl
