JSON & XML serialisation

2017-11-10 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Hi, I wonder what would be a better solution to replace existing content handlers in the REST plugin, there are basically two options: - Java API for JSON Processing - a standard lib http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/java/json-1973242.html - The Apache Juneau project http://juneau.apach

Re: JSON & XML serialisation

2017-11-10 Thread Greg Huber
Would use Jackson for serialization etc. OK, not an apache project though. On 10 November 2017 at 08:08, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > Hi, > > I wonder what would be a better solution to replace existing content > handlers in the REST plugin, there are basically two options: > > - Java API for JSON Pro

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

2017-11-10 Thread Lukasz Lenart
I have added a Jenkins build to perform a Sonar analysis per push but I disabled spamming the dev@ list for now ;-) https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=org.apache.struts%3Astruts2-parent 2017-11-08 11:18 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart : > There is a Sonar instance running > https://builds.apa

AW: JSON & XML serialisation

2017-11-10 Thread Christoph.Nenning
Hi, I would prefer standardized "Java API for JSON Processing" just to avoid another dependency forced on applications. It seems to me selection of json library is like selection of logging lib. There are some options and everyone wants to use something different. It is hard for a framework to

Re: Would we need to achieve better place in trends ranking?

2017-11-10 Thread Yasser Zamani
On 11/10/2017 12:58 PM, Lukasz Lenart wrote: > I have added a Jenkins build to perform a Sonar analysis per push but > I disabled spamming the dev@ list for now;-) > > https://builds.apache.org/analysis/overview?id=org.apache.struts%3Astruts2-parent > > 2017-11-08 11:18 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Lenart:

Re: AW: JSON & XML serialisation

2017-11-10 Thread Yasser Zamani
On 11/10/2017 1:07 PM, christoph.nenn...@bmw.de wrote: > Hi, > > I would prefer standardized "Java API for JSON Processing" just to avoid > another dependency forced on applications. > Doesn't this force user to use a specific jdk version? I also worry for any issue, we have to wait for long

Re: Struts 2.3.14

2017-11-10 Thread Lukasz Lenart
Great! I think we are good to go :) 2017-11-09 20:35 GMT+01:00 Stefaan Dutry : >> I'm on it. > Done. > > Regards, > Stefaan Dutry (sdutry) > > 2017-11-09 20:00 GMT+01:00 Stefaan Dutry : update that to version 2.9.1 first? >> >>>Good point, we should :) Can you do it? >> I'm on it. >> >> Regar