+1 for dedicated stack, but not sure if we should name it "default secure
stack" as it implies that the other stacks are not secure.
My 2ct on this
Best Regards
Johannes
i...@flyingfischer.ch schrieb am Mi., 31. Aug.
2022, 14:20:
> Creating a new default secure stack sounds good to me.
Creating a new default secure stack sounds good to me. Thank for
considering.
As far as I can see there would be 4 additional interceptors in this
secure stack:
CoepInterceptor.java
CoopInterceptor.java
CspInterceptor.java
FetchMetadataInterceptor.java
And the appropriate resources used by
I think disabling them doesn't make sense - these are just
interceptors so you can create your own stack without them. I would
rather create a new default secure stack and move those interceptors
into that stack, wdyt?
Regards
--
Łukasz
+ 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/
