exists in XWork code, too (see original poster's
comment), and how poor design like this affects the public view of Struts2.
Use of the constants interface antipattern is a sign of choosing laziness
over good design.
CleverSwine
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/StrutsStat
Chris Pratt wrote:
> I never said it was a good idea, it's just something that was so common
> that
> they decided to make it part of the language.
This statement demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of Java. I really
hope you are NOT a committer on the struts2 project.
Chris Pratt wrot
Antonio Petrelli wrote:
> Err... Does C++ have interfaces at all? All I recall is that C++ has
> classes.
Of course it does. A simple google search
(http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=C%2B%2B+interfaces&btnG=Google+Search)
would have shown you. Perhaps you're thinking of C.
Al Sutton wrote:
eople did it. There's no other reason to do it.
Did you purposefully quote me out-of-context? The full quote is:
CleverSwine wrote:
> I disagree. Auto-complete/auto-suggest editors (or "IntelliSense", as
> Microsoft likes to call it) like JBuilder et. al., and, later, Eclipse,
