[GitHub] struts pull request #110: updated javadoc after changing to enum

2016-09-15 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/110 updated javadoc after changing to enum You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4686-javadoc Alternatively you can

[GitHub] struts issue #111: replaced String constants for marking status with enum

2016-09-16 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/111 registerd jira issue [WW-4689](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4689) --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your

[GitHub] struts pull request #112: WW-4690 added version to jshint-maven-plugin

2016-09-18 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/112 WW-4690 added version to jshint-maven-plugin [issue WW-4690](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WW-4690) You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108343668 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/result/HttpsOffloadAwareServletRedirectResult.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,145

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108343998 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/result/HttpsOffloadAwareServletRedirectResult.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,145

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108344564 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/result/HttpsOffloadAwareServletRedirectResult.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,145

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108519883 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/README.md --- @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +# Apache Struts 2 Extras - custom results plugin + +[![License](http

[GitHub] struts-extras issue #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3 @lukaszlenart I think i might be about where i would end up without extra input. Could you (or anyone else) please do another review. Seeing as the issue where this idea

[GitHub] struts pull request #126: WW-4770 Fixes problem with dojo.version

2017-03-24 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/126 WW-4770 Fixes problem with dojo.version You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts issue/WW-4770 Alternatively you can

[GitHub] struts pull request #127: Drop deprecated logging layer

2017-03-29 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/127 Drop deprecated logging layer WW-4763 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4763 Alternatively you can review

[GitHub] struts-extras issue #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-29 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3 @lukaszlenart Am i allowed to merge this now? Or does this need to be reviewed and approved by someone else first? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email

[GitHub] struts issue #127: Drop deprecated logging layer

2017-03-29 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/127 > Did you notice that this targets Struts 2.6 Oops, didn't notice that. Best to just close this pull request then for now i guess. --- If your project is set up for it, you

[GitHub] struts pull request #127: Drop deprecated logging layer

2017-03-29 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/127 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108511395 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/README.md --- @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +# Apache Struts 2 Extras - custom results plugin + +[![License](http

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108515260 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108515221 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108515681 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/result/SslOffloadAwareServletRedirectResult.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,188

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108515374 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/pom.xml --- @@ -0,0 +1,104 @@ + + +http://maven.apache.org/POM/4.0.0; xmlns:xsi="http://www.w

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108515624 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/result/SslOffloadAwareServletActionRedirectResult.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,123

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-28 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3#discussion_r108516053 --- Diff: struts2-custom-results-plugin/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/result/SslOffloadAwareServletRedirectResult.java --- @@ -0,0 +1,188

[GitHub] struts-extras pull request #3: added module for extra result types

2017-03-27 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-extras/pull/3 added module for extra result types This is still work in progress. The reason i'm already having it as pull request is because any input is welcome. related to WW-4774

[GitHub] struts-site pull request #8: cleaned up remaining getting-started pages

2017-04-02 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-site/pull/8 cleaned up remaining getting-started pages You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts-site cleanup Alternatively you can

[GitHub] struts-site pull request #5: cleaned up hello-world-using-struts2 page

2017-04-01 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-site/pull/5 cleaned up hello-world-using-struts2 page Tried cleaning up the hello-world-using-struts2 page. - It's still missing a couple of links that were in the original page

[GitHub] struts-site pull request #6: cleaned up using-tags page

2017-04-01 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-site/pull/6 cleaned up using-tags page You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts-site using-tags Alternatively you can review

[GitHub] struts-site pull request #9: updated how-to-create-a-struts2-web-application...

2017-04-17 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-site/pull/9 updated how-to-create-a-struts2-web-application page to current example application Tried updating this page to more reflect the application inside the struts-examples git repo

[GitHub] struts pull request #132: WW-4780 : upgraded version of log4j2 to 2.8.2

2017-04-20 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/132 WW-4780 : upgraded version of log4j2 to 2.8.2 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4780 Alternatively you can

[GitHub] struts issue #132: WW-4780 : upgraded version of log4j2 to 2.8.2

2017-04-21 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/132 @lukaszlenart I know they can. I just like having the confirmation from the automated build tools (jenkins and travis) that i didn't break the builds before committing. --- If your project

[GitHub] struts-site pull request #7: Cleaned up some of the markdown files

2017-04-01 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts-site/pull/7 Cleaned up some of the markdown files Not stating that they're perfect, but it should be an improved starting point at least You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running

[GitHub] struts issue #157: WW-4834 fixed faulty regex

2017-08-02 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/157 Ok, I will wait. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes

[GitHub] struts pull request #157: WW-4834 fixed faulty regex

2017-08-02 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/157 WW-4834 fixed faulty regex You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4834 Alternatively you can review and apply

[GitHub] struts issue #157: WW-4834 fixed faulty regex

2017-08-03 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/157 > After the commit above, any IP with 3 digits in the last octet will not pass validation You are right, i forgot the grouping (meaning the or statements mean something completely differ

[GitHub] struts issue #157: WW-4834 fixed faulty regex

2017-08-03 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/157 @lukaszlenart Sorry for breaking it in the first place. That wasn't my intention. Do you want me to merge this now, or am i still overlooking stuff? --- If your project is set up

[GitHub] struts pull request #151: WW-4818 change default Multipart validation regex ...

2017-07-25 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/151#discussion_r129281083 --- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/dispatcher/Dispatcher.java --- @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ */ public static final String

[GitHub] struts pull request #151: WW-4818 change default Multipart validation regex ...

2017-07-25 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/151#discussion_r129282110 --- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/dispatcher/Dispatcher.java --- @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ */ public static final String

[GitHub] struts pull request #151: WW-4818 change default Multipart validation regex ...

2017-07-25 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/151#discussion_r129283402 --- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/dispatcher/Dispatcher.java --- @@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ */ public static final String

[GitHub] struts pull request #151: WW-4818 change default Multipart validation regex ...

2017-07-25 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/151 WW-4818 change default Multipart validation regex to comply with RFC1341 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4818

[GitHub] struts issue #151: WW-4818 change default Multipart validation regex to comp...

2017-07-25 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/151 @lukaszlenart I added 2 simple tests. - one containing all the special allowed characters - another one containing a single not-allowed character Please feel free to tell me what

[GitHub] struts issue #151: WW-4818 change default Multipart validation regex to comp...

2017-07-25 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/151 @lukaszlenart Am i allowed to merge this or is there more work/checks that needs to happen first? --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear

[GitHub] struts pull request #149: WW-4821 Upgrade Commons IO to 2.5

2017-07-23 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/149 WW-4821 Upgrade Commons IO to 2.5 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4821 Alternatively you can review and apply

[GitHub] struts pull request #150: WW-4819 fixed commons-collections groupId in depen...

2017-07-24 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/150 WW-4819 fixed commons-collections groupId in dependency management You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4819

[GitHub] struts pull request #152: WW-4826 upgrade to ASM version 5.2

2017-07-26 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/152 WW-4826 upgrade to ASM version 5.2 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4826 Alternatively you can review and apply

[GitHub] struts pull request #156: WW-4834 Improve RegEx used to validate URLs

2017-08-01 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/156 WW-4834 Improve RegEx used to validate URLs changed the regex according to https://github.com/apache/struts/commit/8df5a897f61f3ef45c36fdd9275e9ae4516c#commitcomment-23414493 Can anyone

[GitHub] struts pull request #159: WW-4834 Improve RegEx used to validate URLs

2017-08-04 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/159 WW-4834 Improve RegEx used to validate URLs You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4834-support-2-3 Alternatively you

[GitHub] struts issue #159: WW-4834 Improve RegEx used to validate URLs

2017-08-04 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/159 see #157 and #156 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so

[GitHub] struts issue #159: WW-4834 Improve RegEx used to validate URLs

2017-08-07 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/159 @lukaszlenart i copied the regex after the changes from #157 . So it should be the same. Feel free to check. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your

[GitHub] struts pull request #136: WW-4793 only add JBossFileManager when supported

2017-05-09 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/136 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature

[GitHub] struts issue #136: WW-4793 only add JBossFileManager when supported

2017-05-09 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on the issue: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/136 Given the input on the issue, this pull request should not be merged. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] struts pull request #136: WW-4793 only add JBossFileManager when supported

2017-05-01 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/136 WW-4793 only add JBossFileManager when supported You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4793 Alternatively you can

[GitHub] struts pull request #136: WW-4793 only add JBossFileManager when supported

2017-05-01 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/136#discussion_r114157280 --- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/util/fs/JBossFileManager.java --- @@ -210,4 +187,33 @@ private void addIfAbsent(List urls, URL fileUrl

[GitHub] struts pull request #136: WW-4793 only add JBossFileManager when supported

2017-05-01 Thread sdutry
Github user sdutry commented on a diff in the pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/136#discussion_r114154579 --- Diff: core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/util/fs/JBossFileManager.java --- @@ -210,4 +187,33 @@ private void addIfAbsent(List urls, URL fileUrl

[GitHub] struts pull request #166: WW-4851 Upgrade to Log4j2 2.9.0

2017-09-06 Thread sdutry
GitHub user sdutry opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/struts/pull/166 WW-4851 Upgrade to Log4j2 2.9.0 You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/sdutry/struts WW-4851 Alternatively you can review and apply