Hi guys,
sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for
struts2 dojo widgets.
- use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo.provide,
dojo.extends etc. Dojo got most of its widget rewritten using this way.
- have struts2 widgets/utils as a separa
Hi guys,
Is it possible to have something like
o.a.s.d.RoleMatcher
o.a.s.d.AgentMatchero.a.s.d.ServletDispatcherResult
so that we don't need to introduce another class attribute to the param tag.
Thoughts? :-)
"David H. DeWolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: YES! I like that. This
ready, as per Don's comment
somewhere on this thread.
musachy
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for
> struts2 dojo widgets.
>
> - use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo.provide
g used in struts already, as per Don's comment
somewhere on this thread.
musachy
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for
> struts2 dojo widgets.
>
> - use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo
ready, as per Don's comment
somewhere on this thread.
musachy
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for
> struts2 dojo widgets.
>
> - use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo.provide
g used in struts already, as per Don's comment
somewhere on this thread.
musachy
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> sorry for jumping into this late. I think we should do the followings for
> struts2 dojo widgets.
>
> - use dojo.widget.defineWidget instead of the old-way of using dojo
yes, I overwrote those bindXs with
defineWidget. We are going to need
another bug for the actual upgrade from dojo 0.3 to 0.4(0.4 was released
today I think).
musachy
tm jee wrote:
>> I'm using defineWidget, and it is cool.
>>
> Yup. Is it that the bind, binddiv, bindanchor
Hi guys,
If its ok with everyone, I'd like to upgrade Struts2 dojo js to 0.4, sometime
today or tomorrow. (WW-1845). This will most likely breaks some existing
struts2 components. We will patch them up individually (WW-1844)
Cheers
tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Done, 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
phone:617.821.5430
~~~~~~~~~
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> If its ok with everyone, I'd like to upgrade Struts2 dojo js to 0.4, sometime
> today or tomorrow. (WW-1845). This will most likely breaks some existing
> struts2 components
issing are
ToggleBindDiv.js, DynArchCalendar.js, and TimePicker, I think only
TimerPicker is important(I need to add DropDownTimePicker), which I could
get done by Wednesday or Thursday.
musachy
On 10/31/06, tm jee wrote:
>
> Hi Ian,
>
> > Have we cut the 2.0.1 beta yet?
> I
Hi guys,
What do you guys think about having a CompositeActionMapper that allows one of
the many ActionMapper it has to being used.
1 +-+
+| ActionMapper |
|+-+
|^
||
| +--
Hi,
Both filter, ActionContextCleanUp and FilterDispatcher contains some similar
logic which I think would be more appropriate if we move them to an abstract
superclass, maybe called AbstractFilterDispatcher.
Some of the logics are
- creation of a Dispatcher
- populating the created Dispatch
and keep careless developer like me to make sure the test case passed and
things run smoothly before commiting
James Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: and do the nightly distribution
--
James Mitchell
678.910.8017
On Nov 1, 2006, at 5:10 AM, James Mitchell wrote:
> http://struts.zone
abbedPannel, DatePicker, TimePicker,
DropDownDateTimePicker(kind of a verbose name right? :))
musachy
tm jee wrote:
> Done, 2 jira ticket created
>
> http://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1484
> - upgrading Struts2 dojo widget that might failed due to upgrading doj
t of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file
core/src/main/java/org/apache/struts2/views/freemarker/tags/PanelModel.java.rej
(Stripping trailing CRs from patch.)
....
rgds
tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Okie dokie. Thx Musachy. :-)
Musachy Barroso wrote: I have attached the patch to
tried also with similar
results(using patch), I tried with eclipse and
it worked like a charm. Shame on me :)
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I've tried to apply Musachy's patch on my local machine and the following is
> the output. There seems to be some part that
Hi Vitor,
I think the do fallback was removed from webwork. Have a look at
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WW/Key+Changes+From+WebWork+2 for
more of the changes from webwork to struts2.
> Or maybe I did something wrong and I'm totally embarassing myself right
> now.
No you are not.
Hi guys,
I think this option is mentioned before in Struts2 maling list (by Ted if not
mistaken). What do you guys think about us forking Ognl? Ognl is just too
important to WebWork/Struts2.
Thoughts? Good? Bad?
rgds
Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/6/06, Don Brown wrote:
sounds ok to me. But are we going to take it out in 2.1.x ? I'd prefer not to.
rgds
Matt Raible <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 for restoring "do*".
Matt
On 11/6/06, Don Brown wrote:
> tm jee wrote:
> > Hi Vitor,
> >
> > I think the do fallback was remo
TECTED]> wrote: tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I think this option is mentioned before in Struts2 maling list (by Ted if not
> mistaken). What do you guys think about us forking Ognl? Ognl is just too
> important to WebWork/Struts2.
>
> Thoughts? Good? Bad
>
Well, since
Okie dokie Rainer.
I'll have a go at it, this weekend and comming weekends as well.
rgds
Rainer Hermanns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Toby,
have a look at OS Jira for XWork2...
There are some open issues left, mostly regarding the build and release
process with maven.
I plan to work on these
There's a related jira issue for this as well reported on WebWork.
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/WW-1369
I don't think there's an issue comparing the key. What do others think about
it? But for rendering the page, we should use the string cause freemarker will
added locale specific infor
Yup. That's the reason I think its ok to compare they key, just like the patch
(ww-1369) and you suggested. :-)
Ruimo Uno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 2006/11/8, tm jee :
> There's a related jira issue for this as well reported on WebWork.
>
> http://jira.opensymphony
Yup, but sometimes the key might be an object or a string, I guess that's the
reason toString() was used.
I think it should be fixed as Ruimo Uno suggested.
rgds
Musachy Barroso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: You can force freemarker to render
it as a number with "?c" I th
Hi guys,
I've go ahead make the following changes on struts2-archetype-starter :-
- make web.xml 2.4 compatible instead of 2.3 (removed the taglib portion and
add the appripriate 2.4 web-app tag)
- corrected the unused 'home.html' link
> The next question is, where are Sitemesh tags used at
>
applied to Struts2 too?
2006/11/8, tm jee :
> Yup. That's the reason I think its ok to compare they key, just like the
> patch (ww-1369) and you suggested. :-)
>
>
> Ruimo Uno wrote:
> 2006/11/8, tm jee :
> > There's a related jira issue for t
> Does this need a servlet mapping?
I don't think so. It just expose the servlet instance itself such that
ServletConfig etc. could be obtained . This I think is needed when using a
jsp taglib in freemarker
rgds.
Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
Thx for the clarification Craig. :-)
Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/8/06, tm jee wrote:
>
> > Does this need a servlet mapping?
>
> I don't think so. It just expose the servlet instance itself such
> that ServletConfig etc. could be obtain
Hi guys,
I think there's an issue that might be related to retrotranslator. Its at
https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1493 Could this be related? Thoughs
Have anyone used the weaved jar file with BEA JRockit?
Thx.
Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks, Rainer.
Applying Retrow
Hi guys,
struts2-archetype-starter seems to depends on struts-master version 4-snapshot
which doesn't exists at the moment in maven repository
(http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/). Struts2's core, etc seems to still be using
struts-master version 3.
Are we suppose to use struts-master version 3
Hi guys,
Got XWork2 documentation filled up. Please do have a look at it if you've got
some time to free.
Its at http://wiki.opensymphony.com/display/XW/XWork2
As usual any feedbacks are welcomed. Cheers
rgds
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
ository
true
true
Maybe we should have this in struts2-archetype-starter's pom.xml as well.
rgds
Wendy Smoak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/11/06, tm jee wrote:
> struts2-archetype-starter seems to depends on struts-master version
> 4-snapshot which do
Hi Ruimo,
If not mistaken i think we might need this
...
...
rgds
Ruimo Uno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi,
I'm trying Spring2 with Struts2 but cannot configure request scoped bean.
I've changed web.xml along with the folowing guide:
http://www.opensymphony.com/webwork/wikidocs/Sprin
You are welcomed. :)
Ruimo Uno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Thanks! It works fine!
2006/11/12, tm jee :
>
> Hi Ruimo,
>
> If not mistaken i think we might need this
>
>
> ...
>
> ...
>
>
> rgds
>
>
> Ruimo Uno wrote: Hi,
>
> I&#
Sounds interesing. I guess after this, to use XWork, we could just say, grab a
copy ActionProxyFactory from Container, and everything is wired in by Guice.
Is there any place where those interested could follow up with this? Maybe a
jira issue describing the details about it. Guice is cool, shou
Hi guys,
There might be a fix releated to this
(https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1489) that seems to be broken.
WW-1489 abstracted the common logic from both DispatcherFilter and
ActionContextCleanUp to an Abstract filter. With the latest commit,
FilterDispatcher is put back to its
Hey guys,
What do you guys think about moving Ognl code base into Struts2, just like what
was did with Guice?
rgds
-
All new Yahoo! Mail "The new Interface is stunning in its simplicity and ease
of use." - PC Magazine
felt
appropriate?
But as Martin pointed out, there's going to be quite a massive responsibility
in maintaining ognl docs, patches, user requests etc. So i guess its not really
a feasible option right now.
Cheers.
Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/13/06, tm jee wro
er needs to initialize the dispatcher?
Don
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> There might be a fix releated to this
> (https://issues.apache.org/struts/browse/WW-1489) that seems to be broken.
> WW-1489 abstracted the common logic from both DispatcherFilter and
> ActionContextCleanU
you have a
chance, please readd your fix, but try to find more explicit names for
the dispatchers and very clearly document the logic so it is easier to
grasp. If you don't have time, I may be able to get to it next week.
Thanks,
Don
tm jee wrote:
>> Could you go into detail why the c
I see. thx for the info Don. Just removed the comments in default.properties,
added / updated javadoc in CompositeActionMapper to reflect this.
cheers.
Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Actually, that wasn't an accident. The
composite mapper now uses a
different, simpler mechanism to gath
Hi guys,
I think we might need to push back XWork2 release plan a bit. With the new IoC
feature in XWork2, the docs gets outdated, might need some time to make it
up-todate again. Thoughts?
Cheers.
Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: James Mitchell wrote:
> I'd be happy to take a stab at ad
etter as we learn its capabilities.
Don
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Sorry, this might be off topic a bit.
>
> Just want to say I really like Guice. Its simple, fast (amazing !!!), well
> written ...
>
> I like the code, its so clean and elegant (to me at least). For newbies l
Hi Konstantin,
Its at http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/
Enjoy Guice. Its Guice time :-)
Cheers.
Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Guice doesn't seem to have a mailing list or forum.
> Does anyone kno
Good idea Alex. ;)
I manage to find his email at carzybob.org
Alexandru Popescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 11/15/06, tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Guice doesn't seem to have a mailing list or forum. Does anyone know how to
> follow up with development / news of Gui
bscribe to it.
Cheers.
Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- tm jee wrote:
> Hi Konstantin,
>
> Its at http://code.google.com/p/google-guice/
>
> Enjoy Guice. Its Guice time :-)
Not sure whether I will be enjoying it, but I
will try to understa
et the bits
out there. I think we
anticipate that both the XWork 2 and Struts 2 distributions will be
stuck at beta again this cycle. But, we can't have another Struts 2
beta without another XWork 2 beta.
On 11/15/06, tm jee wrote:
> I think we might need to push back XWork2 release plan a
Hi Mark,
Thank you for your interest and efford. I think we could add it into the
example section. :-) As the article is about Struts2, I think it would be more
appropriate if we have it in Struts2 confluence, what do you think?
Unfortunately to access the struts2 confluence, one needs CLA.
(
Hi guys,
Found a possible bug with Struts2 DI feature. Opened up a jira issue for it
(WW-1508). Leaving the issue open for reviews. Don if you got the time to have
a look, it would be great.
cheers
Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com
Guice source code if all possible to facilitate easier
synchronization with the original project.
Could you back out the changes and try the required="false" approach?
Thanks,
Don
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Found a possible bug with Struts2 DI feature. Opened up a jira issue
used by not initialized. Then, we wouldn't need all the
changes to xwork and guice. In particular, I'd like to avoid changing
the Guice source code if all possible to facilitate easier
synchronization with the original project.
Could you back out the changes and try the require
Hi Don,
I've reverted the changes on my local box, and tried out with
@Inject(required=false), when starting jetty using mvn jetty:run, it seems to
be giving me the following stack
Should I commit back the reverted changes. Can't figure out a way to fix this
without doing changes to the DI Con
Hi guys,
I've undo the commit for WW-1506, so the problem will still exists in the
latest svn head. Can't seems to figure out a way without doing changes (quite
major) to the container /xwork2 api. See jira issue WW-1506 for more info.
p/s i might be off for a few days.
rgd
ight be totally wrong. :)
Unfortunately I can't make it to JavaPolis. what a pitty. If you decided to
have a blog, do let me know. I could be reached at (tm_jee at yahoo dot co do
uk).
Cheers.
rgds
Konstantin Priblouda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
--- tm jee wrote:
> Thx
Hi guys,
Shouldn't we have the xwork stuff in xwork-default.xml? In struts-default.xml,
There's some common beans like
...
..
that might be better if moved to xwork-default.xml Am I missing somthing?
rgds
Send instant messages to your
itional hidden
xwork-default.xml
I'm open to changing this if there are other good options on the table.
Don
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Shouldn't we have the xwork stuff in xwork-default.xml? In struts-default
uts-default.xml.
Thoughts?
rgds
tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see. What about duplicating those beans in xwork-default.xml, it is still
going to be in struts-default.xml as well.
Just such that those who use xwork standalone could do
// the will load xwork-default.xml and all the
Hi guys,
There's some part I don't understand, would be glad if anyone could help me
understand it better.
In Dispatcher, during init (in init() method),. BeanSelectionProvider is being
added twice to ConfigurationManager, once during loading config from
classloader (zero configuration) and
Ok. thx :)
Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do an svn update...I just fixed that bug
30 minutes ago :)
Don
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> There's some part I don't understand, would be glad if anyone could help me
> understand it better.
>
> In Dispatc
sorry for poping this again. Any thoughts on this? :)
tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: forgotten some stuff in previous post.
xwork-default.xml wouldn't be loaded is we are using Struts2, just that with
this approach there's 2 files to maintain whenever we introduce new bea
Hi Mark,
By doing
valueStack.getContext();
we get the valueStack's context (a Map) whose value with "someKey" as its key
is accessible through
<@s.property value="%{#someKey}" />
There's a root in the value stack as well,
valueStack.getRoot();
which is like a stack, I think that's where t
Hi Rainer,
>Toby, are you still working on the docs?
I think there's some changes needed to be done on the current xwork2 docs,
there's the new DI introduced lately and I think the docs doesn't take that
into account. I think (I am not sure) that the creation of ActionProxy etc.
might be diff
Lmao ;-D
Philip Luppens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Although the train stops in
Aachen, I fear I will
> not
> > join you there, as Rainer and me will go together
> by
> > car . But I'm sure we find some time & place in
> > Antwerp :)
>
> Well, you have not that far from aachen to Antwer
Happy new year guys. :-)
WebWork just like any other open-source project follows the open-source
spirits. It is very much driven by the community itself. Features are often
implemented when they are substantial enough, it doesn't matter if it
originated from users, commiters or the project lead
Hi guys,
> OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last week, save
> one that might still be sitting on Toby's hard drive :)
The jira issue for this is at [1]. Would it be possible to not migrate this to
Struts2, cause I am not really sure how to make it a plugin (part of the code
forgotten to mention that the code is already in WebWork svn together with
documentation and a showcase example. Details could be found in the jira issue
itself.
cheers
tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi guys,
> OK, we've now cleared out all the 2.0.7 patches from last we
Sounds cool Ted, marked as "fix for fure".
Cheers.
Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We could just change the "Fix For" to
future, in case someone wants to
try later.
Ted.
On 3/12/07, tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> > OK, we've now cleared out
Hi guys,
Just wondering have we come to a conclusion on the naming convention.
The showcase examples currently have package declared as
org.apache.struts.action2. etc. but the actual directory is still
com.opensymphony.webwork. etc , should we used the apache one or does the
showcase remains
usted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List ; tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, 1 April, 2006 9:54:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Action2] Naming convention & Showcase example
On 4/1/06, tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Just wondering have we come
I've done changing back the packaging and making sure the test case runs ok.
Just in case there's any problem introduced, just post it on the malling list
and I'll be glad to fix them. Thanks :-)
- Original Message ----
From: tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts
Hi guys,
Just want to ask a bit about the freemarker and velocity prefix for SAF2.0.
Currently for freemarker, the Freemarker transform and Velocity prefix used is
ww
in freemarker, it will be @ww.url @ww.a ... @ww.textfieldetc
in velocity, it will be @wwurl @wwa @wwtextf
Hi Guys,
ant new target under webapps used to create an empty webapp structure failed
due to the missing blank.iml and eclipse file (.project, .classpath).
Are those files removed because we are moving to using maven to generate idea
and eclipse project configuration files?
regards
een using a: but saf: is fine too, if that is the preferred
prefix. It really is only important to be consistent in our apps and
docs, since the end user can make it whatever they want.
Don
tm jee wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Just want to ask a bit about the freemarker and velocity prefix for
Hi,
1] Just wondering if we are using http://issues.apache.org/struts for SAF2.0
bug tracking instead of OpenSymphony's. Just tried to access it but it seems to
be down.
2] In STATUS.txt, it says that
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/sandbox/trunk/action2/ is the
repository which if
Okie dokie thx for the information Pat. I'll try to read up about maven and try
to get in running on my box. Cheers.
- Original Message
From: Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, 11 April, 2006 2:39:13 PM
Subject: Re: [Action2] ant new target fai
Wow that's impressive Don.. :-)
- Original Message
From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2006 10:18:55 AM
Subject: [action2] Problem reports for configuration errors
I just added a feature to Action 2, which when in devMode, disp
No problem. :-) Don actually did all the hard work of dojo component migration.
- Original Message
From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Sunday, 16 April, 2006 12:51:17 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r394308 - in /incubator/webwork2/action/src/test:
java/or
> It's been the policy of the Apache Struts project that we don't use
> author tags
I see. I'll remove all of them when i got the time, which should be soon. :-)
- Original Message
From: Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Sunday, 16 April, 2006 8:35:17 AM
Hey guys,
I've registered myself with the confluence at http://confluence.twdata.org .
Can't seems to see any WebWork related documents there. Is it possible that
the data haven't been loaded to this instance yet? Or are we suppose to migrate
it on a page by page basis?
rgds
- Origi
+1
Hi guys,
Is it possible for someone with the granted permission to create in Jira a
global filter for issues pending for SAF2.0 such that it is easier for users to
see what are the outstanding issues and work towards them.
I don't have the permission to create a global filter.
Thx
Hi guys,
What do we need to place in the snippet url in order for it to look for SAF
resource in apache's svn
eg.
1] url=/webwork/ would make confluence look for resource under
/webwork/... in webwork's cvs
2] url=com.opensymphony.xwork.ActionChainResult would make confluence look
un
+1
rgds
- Original Message
From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Saturday, 29 April, 2006 2:19:30 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Accept and Graduate WebWork 2 Podling to Struts
I call a vote that the Struts PMC accept the WebWork 2 podling as having met
the incubati
+1
> I mainly suggest Google Calendar 'cause Bob's been around and we have to make
> him feel good about his employer ;-)
:-D okie dokie, let's go for Google Calendar, just for this reason.
- Original Message
From: Jason Carreira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: S
ut the snippet macro into the confluence.twdata.org
> instance, and it should be pointing correctly to
> the Apache SVN. Patrick?
>
> Don
>
> tm jee wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > What do we need to place in the snippet url in order for it to look for SAF
> >
In OpenSymhpony's maven repository for pell-multipart, the pom.xml is missing a
4.0.0
This causes some problem when trying to run some of maven2 'lifecycle'. Is it
possible for someone to have a look at it.
Thx.
Hi guys,
A newbie suggestion on current SAF2.0 maven build, I am thinking of putting all
dependency version under .
instead of have them specified under ... of project
level pom and subproject pom overwrite them accordingly. It makes it easier to
manage dependency, just in case we need to
Just opened up an issue on this (WW-1310). It will be fixed later today. Thanks
for reporting Jay.
Webwork jira (issue tracker) is at
https://issues.apache.org/struts/secure/Dashboard.jspa
- Original Message
From: Jay H. Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: We
Sounds like a lot of fun. Unfortunately I can't make it. :-(
Is it possible to post a summary about what has been discussed and the
conclusion arrived at. That would really help people who can't make it
catch-up. Thx
rgds
- Original Message
From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Str
Hi guys,
It seems that I can't commit into action2 svn anymore. Keeps giving me error.
Seems like https:svn.apache.org/ is down. Does anyone experience this, or is it
just me?
Thx
rgds
typo, it should reads https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/struts/action2/trunk/
- Original Message
From: tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Friday, 12 May, 2006 5:33:35 PM
Subject: [action2] can't commit into svn
Hi guys,
It seems that I can't com
Hi Scud,
I understand and share your concern. We are planning a 2.2.3 release. Its
basically back porting some bugs fixed in SAF back to WW. The discussion on the
release could be found at
http://forums.opensymphony.com/thread.jspa?threadID=30435&tstart=0 while the
bugs to be back ported can b
Lovely. Thx Pat.
- Original Message
From: Patrick Lightbody <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 15 May, 2006 1:56:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Action2] STATUS - Documentation
The snippet macro is updated. You can use URLs in the following format:
org.struts.apache.actio
The changes is in xwork cvs. I think doing a cvs update xwork and do a mvn
install for xwork to be in the local repository. Then the compilation for
action2 should work.
- Original Message
From: Don Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Struts Developers List
Sent: Friday, 19 May, 2006
Hit send too soon. :-P
The changes are in xwork cvs. I think doing a cvs update on xwork following by
a mvn install for xwork to be in the local repository, the compilation for
action2 should work.
I'll try it my local machine. It seems to be ok the last time I tried it. But
let me just do
This has been fixed in svn head. The assembly module is being commented out, do
an svn update and you get the changes. If not just edit the pom.xml under
action2 and comment out the assembly module.
- Original Message
From: Jason Lenhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
S
It looks like maven is working ok and would download xwork when i nuke it out
in my local repository. I remember reading somewhere that maven download
snapshots only once per day, not sure if that's a problem. But I think the
changes have been in xwork cvs more that one day. The following is wh
I am experiencing some problem when trying to refer to snipppet in Confluence,
particularly on this page
http://confluence.twdata.org/display/WW/tree
Trying to change
{snippet:id=javadoc|javadoc=true|url=com.opensymphony.webwork.components.Tree}
to
{snippet:id=javadoc|javadoc=true|url=org.a
it seems that all pages (as far as i could tell) that have snippet refer to
action2 seems to failed. Strange
- Original Message
From: tm jee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dev@struts.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, 21 May, 2006 1:11:09 AM
Subject: [action2] Confluence problem refering to s
>Is the shopping cart app using JSF? I thought Don only added it to
>the showcase.
I think it is because some of the interceptors defined struts-default.xml is
using JSF stuff, SAF2 will throws exception when loading the interceptors that
requires JSF dependencies.
rgds
- Original Message
1 - 100 of 204 matches
Mail list logo
