Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl writes:
This type of changes should be handled outside the WQ operation.
All workqueue operations must be able to cope with restarting multiple times.
This operation can delete the entry from the local_abspath. (One of
the tiny details in fold_scheduling :( )
On Wed, 2010-02-17, Greg Stein wrote:
To further illuminate here... the *same* pristine could have variant
translated_size values based on each node's set of properties
(svn:keywords, svn:eol-style, etc). That is why we attached the
translated_size to the BASE_NODE and WORKING_NODE tables.
Hi Neels!
Thanks for all your feedback! The use of the libsvn_wc terms BASE,
WORKING and ACTUAL will be replaced by your suggested (or was it
Julians?) checked-in state and checked-out state in the next version of
the RFC.
Find further comments inline.
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 03:20:57PM +0100,
-Original Message-
From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
Sent: donderdag 18 februari 2010 11:07
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org; phi...@apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r909093 - in
/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: adm_ops.c workqueue.c
On 17/02/2010 18:40, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 12:22, Matthew Benthammj...@artvps.com wrote:
...
Revised patch attached fixes the unit test (and hopefully the indentation,
if I've understood the style correctly), but I have no real instinct as to
whether I should be modifying a
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Sperling [mailto:s...@elego.de]
Sent: woensdag 17 februari 2010 19:30
To: Matthew Bentham
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wc-ng: remove a use of svn_wc_entry_t from
libsvn_client
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 06:18:56PM +,
Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl writes:
My current code is just a copy of the old code, moved to a new location. No
fixes there. (It still uses svn_wc__entry_modify2).
In the rest of libsvn_wc we still rewrite BASE_NODE and WORKING_NODE records
from just the limited state in svn_wc_entry_t...
-Original Message-
From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
Sent: donderdag 18 februari 2010 13:54
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r909093 - in
/subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc: adm_ops.c workqueue.c
workqueue.h
Bert
Thanks, Greg.
On Wed, 2010-02-17, Greg Stein wrote:
WORKING_NODE rows exist for *all* affected nodes.
Meaning all (grand)children of any affected directory as well, I take
it. OK, Bert confirmed on IRC. Fixed.
ACTUAL_NODE rows may exist w/o a corresponding WORKING_NODE row (in
which case,
Hi!
My initial thought when I started writing on a spec for a TC resolver
was that it would involve a lot of quirks and edge cases handled solely
in subversion/svn/conflict-callbacks.c. That the svn resolver would only
serve as a proof-of-concept for other API users. But if I could
implement the
Hooray!
Many thanks to you and the other people who each put in a lot of work to
make this happen.
- Julian
Greg Stein wrote:
The ASF Board just voted to approve the graduation of Subversion from
the Incubator. We are now an official project of the Apache Software
Foundation!
Go forth!
Bert Huijben b...@qqmail.nl writes:
One other thing that worries me is that mark_tree_deleted seems to
doing deletes without doing the loggy/workqueue stuff. If I delete a
replaced file svn_wc_delete4 sets up a workqueue item to handle the
text-bases. However if I delete a directory
Congrats all!
BTW, I saw commits to update our web site but do not see them on the
site. Is the publishing broken again?
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 6:06 AM, Julian Foad julian.f...@wandisco.com wrote:
Hooray!
Many thanks to you and the other people who each put in a lot of work to
make this
hwri...@apache.org writes:
Author: hwright
Date: Thu Feb 18 12:49:20 2010
New Revision: 911370
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911370view=rev
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_wc/workqueue.c
(run_delete): Do a bunch of casts, to get rid of a few warnings on 64-bit
platforms.
On Feb 18, 2010, at 2:41 PM, Philip Martin wrote:
hwri...@apache.org writes:
Author: hwright
Date: Thu Feb 18 12:49:20 2010
New Revision: 911370
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=911370view=rev
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_wc/workqueue.c
(run_delete): Do a bunch of casts, to get rid
[Stefan Sperling]
Have you seen ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-wc-ng-check-override ?
I think that's the workaround you need. Log of the branch below.
It's already nominated for backport, so if you like it, please vote :)
I hadn't seen it. Yes, this solves the problem - but I'm not sure this
I'm not seeing this problem, but then I don't think I'm setup to generate
stderr spam on malloc/free errors (via the likes of MALLOC_CHECK_=1 in the
environment or somesuch).
Greg Stein wrote:
I think the memory usage might actually be our test harness attempting
to read all of the (stderr)
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Stefan Sperling]
Have you seen ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-wc-ng-check-override ?
I think that's the workaround you need. Log of the branch below.
It's already nominated for backport, so if you like it, please vote :)
I hadn't seen it. Yes, this solves the
It was, yeah. I had infra kick it, and am seeking further
data/solutions if it happens again...
Thx!
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 09:30, Mark Phippard markp...@gmail.com wrote:
Congrats all!
BTW, I saw commits to update our web site but do not see them on the
site. Is the publishing broken
[Julian Foad]
Let's check I understood the problem correctly: User has 1.6 client
and 1.6 WCs, no 1.7 stuff involved at all. User's system has a WC
rooted at the file system root: '/.svn' exists and is not readable by
this user. In some normal operations that used to work with svn
1.6.x,
Oops. Had it backwards. Thanks!
(tho I guess I can pester you that it should have been there when the
bump happened... ;-) )
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 03:53, rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Thu Feb 18 08:53:48 2010
New Revision: 911288
URL:
How fast are sqlite queries be compared to the old-wc entry caching?
Operations like update benefit from faster locking, but in old-wc
status does no locking at all. Also the multiple entries files give
the data a tree-like organisation that is not modelled quite so well
by an SQL table. Is
-Original Message-
From: Philip Martin [mailto:philip.mar...@wandisco.com]
Sent: donderdag 18 februari 2010 19:22
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: Is sqlite fast enough?
How fast are sqlite queries be compared to the old-wc entry caching?
Operations like update benefit
A small nit on the new website: on IE 7, the left navigation bar seems
slightly mis-indented. See screenshot in attachment. It looks like
it's indented too much, making it appear to be right aligned. On IE 8
it shows up correctly though (meaning it seems ok to me, it's the same
as in FF).
Johan
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
A small nit on the new website: on IE 7, the left navigation bar seems
slightly mis-indented. See screenshot in attachment. It looks like
it's indented too much, making it appear to be right aligned. On IE 8
it shows up correctly though (meaning it seems ok to me, it's
Daniel Näslund wrote:
Hi Neels!
Thanks for all your feedback! The use of the libsvn_wc terms BASE,
WORKING and ACTUAL will be replaced by your suggested (or was it
Julians?) checked-in state and checked-out state in the next version of
the RFC.
Hey father man :)
I'd like to make sure
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 06:49, julianf...@apache.org wrote:
...
+++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_wc/wc-metadata.sql Thu Feb 18 11:49:25
2010
@@ -163,6 +163,12 @@
/* -
*/
+
+/* The PRISTINE table keeps track
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Julian Foad wrote:
Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Stefan Sperling]
Have you seen ^/subversion/branches/1.6.x-wc-ng-check-override ?
I think that's the workaround you need. Log of the branch below.
It's already nominated for backport, so if you like it, please vote :)
I hadn't
On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
A small nit on the new website: on IE 7, the left navigation bar seems
slightly mis-indented. See screenshot in attachment. It looks like
it's indented too much, making it appear to be right aligned. On IE 8
it
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 9:05 AM, Hyrum K. Wright
hyrum_wri...@mail.utexas.edu wrote:
On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:22 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote:
A small nit on the new website: on IE 7, the left navigation bar seems
slightly mis-indented. See screenshot in attachment. It
30 matches
Mail list logo
