Because a simple test with using this lock with status shows a 70% performance
increase on Windows.
You can't get to this speed with just removing 50% of the info queries and
Philips tests showed that this is probably the only way to get back at 1.6
status performance.
Bert
- Oorspronkel
I don't see a README.branch or whatever it should be named...
What is this branch for, and why is it not on trunk?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 18:00, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Tue Sep 7 22:00:57 2010
> New Revision: 993544
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993544&view=rev
> Log:
> On
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:08 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 13:34, wrote:
>> Author: rhuijben
>> Date: Fri Sep 3 17:34:52 2010
>> New Revision: 992390
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=992390&view=rev
>> Log:
>> Add a few helper functions to allow experimenting with SQL
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 13:34, wrote:
> Author: rhuijben
> Date: Fri Sep 3 17:34:52 2010
> New Revision: 992390
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=992390&view=rev
> Log:
> Add a few helper functions to allow experimenting with SQLite operations
> inside SAVEPOINTs. This allows taking out a
On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 09:02, wrote:
> Author: ehu
> Date: Mon Sep 6 13:02:14 2010
> New Revision: 993015
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993015&view=rev
> Log:
> Add 'n' (no binding) binding type to svn_sqlite__bindf() to allow
> delayed binding of a small subset of columns.
>
> * su
Qouting myself here from IRC in case anyone missed this.
I've already lost a couple of working copies due to this problem,
so just in case this helps someone I'm pasting it here:
when this happens with the bump-to-19.py script: "skipped: format
is 16 not 18:"
you have basically lost your working
On 07.09.2010 15:42, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>> I would not be so sure. When you are dealing with a GUI, adding a
>>> handful of milliseconds to something that is going to be done
>>>
On 07.09.2010 14:29, Matthew Bentham wrote:
> On 07/09/2010 13:02, Bert Huijben wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Matthew Bentham [mailto:mj...@artvps.com]
>>> Sent: dinsdag 7 september 2010 13:48
>>> To: Bert Huijben
>>> Cc: 'Justin Erenkrantz'; 'Greg Stein'; 'Johan Corveleyn'
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
>> I would not be so sure. When you are dealing with a GUI, adding a
>> handful of milliseconds to something that is going to be done
>> thousands of times can add up to less responsivenes
On 07/09/2010 13:02, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Bentham [mailto:mj...@artvps.com]
Sent: dinsdag 7 september 2010 13:48
To: Bert Huijben
Cc: 'Justin Erenkrantz'; 'Greg Stein'; 'Johan Corveleyn'; 'Subversion
Development'
Subject: Re: Worried about single-db perf
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Bentham [mailto:mj...@artvps.com]
> Sent: dinsdag 7 september 2010 13:48
> To: Bert Huijben
> Cc: 'Justin Erenkrantz'; 'Greg Stein'; 'Johan Corveleyn'; 'Subversion
> Development'
> Subject: Re: Worried about single-db performance
> I didn't realise t
On 06/09/2010 15:18, Bert Huijben wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Bentham [mailto:mj...@artvps.com]
Sent: maandag 6 september 2010 15:07
To: Justin Erenkrantz
Cc: Bert Huijben; Greg Stein; Johan Corveleyn; Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Worried about single-db performance
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:17:10AM +0200, Stephen Butler wrote:
> >> * subversion/include/svn_string.h
> >> (svn_cstring_strtoi64, svn_cstring_atoi64, svn_cstring_atoi,
> >> svn_cstring_strtoui64, svn_cstring_atoui64, svn_cstring_atoui): Declare.
>
> Uh oh, some buildbots complain about APR_UIN
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:19:42PM +0530, Senthil Kumaran S wrote:
> Hi Bert,
>
> rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
> >Author: rhuijben
> >Date: Tue Sep 7 07:32:34 2010
> >New Revision: 993258
> >
> >URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993258&view=rev
> >Log:
> >* subversion/mod_dav_svn/reports/log.c
> -Original Message-
> From: mrmrpotatoh...@gmail.com [mailto:mrmrpotatoh...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Ben K
> Sent: dinsdag 7 september 2010 4:22
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: svnsync --source-username with svn+ssh
>
> I'm having some trouble with svnsync using ssh as a tra
Hi Bert,
rhuij...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rhuijben
Date: Tue Sep 7 07:32:34 2010
New Revision: 993258
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993258&view=rev
Log:
* subversion/mod_dav_svn/reports/log.c
(dav_svn__log_report): Partially revert r993246 to fix compilation.
The malformed_elem
Stefan Sperling wrote:
> > > > > > Colleagues, I understand that you are expecting a patch. I am
> > > > > > sorry, I
> > > > > > am a systems administrator and not a programmer, my code writing
> > > > > > ability does not go beyond scripting.
> > > > >
> > > > > Can you try this patch and let
Hi Stefan,
APR is a moving target...
On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:42 , Greg Stein wrote:
> The buildbots are failing all over the place after this revision...
>
> On Mon, Sep 6, 2010 at 20:09, wrote:
>> Author: stsp
>> Date: Tue Sep 7 00:09:46 2010
>> New Revision: 993183
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apac
18 matches
Mail list logo
