On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 1 20:33:22 2011
New Revision: 1054286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286view=rev
Log:
XDelta calculation is major part of svn_txdelta_send_txstream.
Therefore, speed up string matching code
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 1 20:33:22 2011
New Revision: 1054286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286view=rev
Log:
XDelta calculation is major
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 1 20:33:22 2011
New Revision: 1054286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054286view=rev
Log:
XDelta calculation is major part of svn_txdelta_send_txstream.
Therefore, speed up string matching code
On 02.01.2011 16:38, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Johan Corveleynjcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM,stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 1 20:33:22 2011
New Revision: 1054286
URL:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
On 02.01.2011 16:38, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Johan Corveleynjcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 9:33 PM,stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sat Jan 1
Johan,
I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild. When
I ran that 'up' with the branch build, I got a conflict, which didn't
appear when I ran it with a trunk build. (See attached transcript.)
Furthermore, the conflict resolution (a) marked all the head of the file
as
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Johan,
I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild. When
I ran that 'up' with the branch build, I got a conflict, which didn't
appear when I ran it with a trunk build. (See attached transcript.)
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:13:59 +0100:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Johan,
I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild. When
I ran that 'up' with the branch build, I got a conflict, which didn't
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:13:59 +0100:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Johan,
I saw your sync merge, so I ran 'svn up' with intent to rebuild. When
I
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:45:02 +0100:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Johan Corveleyn wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 20:13:59 +0100:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 7:36 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@apache.org wrote:
Johan,
I saw
On 1/1/2011 11:19 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Sat Jan 1 19:19:53 2011
New Revision: 1054273
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054273view=rev
Log:
Avoid hard-coding a line number in a C test.
* subversion/include/svn_error_codes.h
Blair Zajac wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:51:45 -0800:
On 1/1/2011 11:19 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Sat Jan 1 19:19:53 2011
New Revision: 1054273
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054273view=rev
Log:
Avoid hard-coding a line number in a C test.
*
On 1/2/11 12:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Blair Zajac wrote on Sun, Jan 02, 2011 at 11:51:45 -0800:
On 1/1/2011 11:19 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Sat Jan 1 19:19:53 2011
New Revision: 1054273
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1054273view=rev
Log:
Avoid
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hi Johan,
Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look at how
svn blame could be made faster based on the HEAD code in
your branch.
One night and most of the following day later, I think I made it
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hi Johan,
Thursday night I did something stupid and had a look at how
svn blame could be made faster based on the HEAD code in
your
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hi Johan,
Thursday night I did something stupid and had a
Erik,
Thanks for the patch; I committed it with minor changes in r1054513.
Daniel
Erik Johansson wrote on Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:00:37 +0100:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 21:35, Erik Johansson e...@ejohansson.se wrote:
An attempt to untangle the mess discussed in
On Saturday 01 January 2011 03:10 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote:
Ping. This patch has received no comments.
Gavin,
Julian modified this patch and committed in r1050449.
Thanks Regards,
Vijayaguru
On 18/12/2010, at 2:45 AM, vijay wrote:
Hi,
In r877617, Arfrever improved some messages
Thanks for the update Vijay.
I will remove it from my watch list.
On 03/01/2011, at 5:25 PM, vijay wrote:
On Saturday 01 January 2011 03:10 AM, Gavin Beau Baumanis wrote:
Ping. This patch has received no comments.
Gavin,
Julian modified this patch and committed in r1050449.
Thanks
19 matches
Mail list logo
