Hi,
For some time now I've been looking for a way to configure the windows
indexing service to not index the .svn folders. I wanted to do that in
my installer for TSVN, but after countless hours of searching the web
and reading up even on the internals of the service I found that there
just
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:42, Stefan Küng tortoise...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
For some time now I've been looking for a way to configure the windows
indexing service to not index the .svn folders. I wanted to do that in my
installer for TSVN, but after countless hours of searching the web and
-Original Message-
From: Stefan Küng [mailto:tortoise...@gmail.com]
Sent: zondag 6 februari 2011 10:43
To: Subversion Development
Subject: mark .svn folders to not get indexed
Hi,
For some time now I've been looking for a way to configure the windows
indexing service to not
Ping. This patch has received no new comments.
On 08/01/2011, at 5:08 AM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
I'll add it to my list, but as I'll have to read the whole thing before
answering it might take a while until I'll answer.
If anyone else wants to beat me to it...
Erik Johansson wrote on
Ping. This patch is yet to receive any new comments.
It seems that David has already attached the patches to issue #3588
Gavin Beau Baumanis
On 09/12/2010, at 11:23 PM, David Burley wrote:
They got mangled on the way to my mail client -- I tested them again locally
before attaching them
Ping. This patch submission is yet to receive any new comments.
On 26/01/2011, at 3:29 AM, Danny Trebbien wrote:
Hi Danny.
I committed the patch you refer to, on which this one depends, in
r1063320. However, I'm not likely to get around to reviewing this patch
any time soon. It would be
On 06.02.2011 11:43, Bert Huijben wrote:
Note that this patch is not really what you want: It doesn't handle UTF-8,
nor long path names (which apr's version would do for us). We need to
support both when we don't want to introduce a regression.
Yes, of course.
How about adding this to
On 06.02.2011 11:43, Bert Huijben wrote:
Note that this patch is not really what you want: It doesn't handle UTF-8,
nor long path names (which apr's version would do for us). We need to
support both when we don't want to introduce a regression.
In 1.7 we usually only have one .svn directory
+1, this is a great idea.
On 06.02.2011 10:42, Stefan Küng wrote:
Hi,
For some time now I've been looking for a way to configure the windows
indexing service to not index the .svn folders. I wanted to do that in
my installer for TSVN, but after countless hours of searching the web
and
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:30:16PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sun Feb 6 14:30:16 2011
New Revision: 1067675
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067675view=rev
Log:
Add cache configuration parameter SVNInMemoryCacheSize to mod_dav_svn.
Now, the in-memory
On 06.02.2011 18:32, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2011 at 02:30:16PM -, stef...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sun Feb 6 14:30:16 2011
New Revision: 1067675
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1067675view=rev
Log:
Add cache configuration parameter SVNInMemoryCacheSize
Hi Johan,
I just finished the review of the changes on your branch.
Except for a few minor hints, everything looks fine and
should be merged to /trunk. The two findings can be
addressed on /trunk directly.
-- Stefan^2.
Index: BRANCH-README
On 28.01.2011 05:27, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:42 PM, Stefan Sperlings...@elego.de wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:25:59PM +0100, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
Hi @all,
I'm planning to merge said branch Monday 7th.
Speak now or forever hold your peace.
Rationale:
I've been
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Merge is done and everything got adapted
to support both server types equally. The new
caching code is active by default.
BTW, how / where do we document things like
the new mod_dav_svn module parameter?
I
Hi, back with another svn question regardling branches. Beat my head against
this wall for a while and figured someone here would know.
I've been trying to go about doing branch imports a somewhat strange, to svn
it appears, way. I run a checkout like so:
svn co -r1
Hi Larry,
This mailing list is for the discussion of developing Subversion.
Your question would get a armer response if you posted to;
us...@subversion.apache.org
Gavin Beau Baumanis
On 07/02/2011, at 8:54 AM, Larry McVoy wrote:
Hi, back with another svn question regardling branches. Beat
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann
stefanfuhrm...@alice-dsl.de wrote:
Hi Johan,
I just finished the review of the changes on your branch.
Except for a few minor hints, everything looks fine and
should be merged to /trunk. The two findings can be
addressed on /trunk directly.
Stefan,
[[[
% make -s
subversion/libsvn_subr/cache-membuffer.c:1223: warning:
‘svn_membuffer_cache_get_partial’ defined but not used
subversion/libsvn_subr/cache-membuffer.c:1250: warning:
‘svn_membuffer_cache_is_cachable’ defined but not used
% grep -R svn_membuffer_cache_is_cachable
I managed to cause 'svn' to lose my commit message when (for whatever
reason) Vim exited with error code 2 after I'd saved the file:
[[[
subversion/svn/commit-cmd.c:154: (apr_err=200012)
subversion/libsvn_client/commit.c:845: (apr_err=200012)
svn: Commit failed (details follow):
On 05.02.2011 21:55, Johan Corveleyn wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Sat, Feb 05, 2011 at 06:47:35PM +0100, Branko Čibej wrote:
I would not worry about existing clients --
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 12:24 AM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.netwrote:
On 01/31/2011 12:21 AM, Daniel Becroft wrote:
I'm submitting this patch as a am I on the right track? submission,
rather
than a final job. I'll craft a log message if I'm correct.
Heh, I remember when this
On Saturday 05 February 2011 01:46 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, C. Michael Pilatocmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 02/04/2011 02:09 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15, Hyrum K Wrighthy...@hyrumwright.org wrote:
...
We currently mark tests XFail (or
Arwin Arni ar...@collab.net writes:
On Saturday 05 February 2011 01:46 AM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:54 PM, C. Michael Pilatocmpil...@collab.net
wrote:
On 02/04/2011 02:09 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 12:15, Hyrum K Wrighthy...@hyrumwright.org wrote:
23 matches
Mail list logo
