On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 13:09, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 17:25:28 +0200:
>> [[[
>> FSFS: Eliminate the DAG API's NODE_POOL, step 1.
>>
>> This makes the dag_node_t struct track its own lifetime, rather than
>> depend on callers to provide a convenient pool
That's really crazy! It also happens for me...
I've star'd the issue.
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> For Chrome users who have noticed that our dist.a.o area[1]
> auto-prompts for translation from Galician :-P .
Hey all,
For Chrome users who have noticed that our dist.a.o area[1]
auto-prompts for translation from Galician :-P ... I've filed a bug
about the problem:
http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=119964
Note that I tweaked the httpd.conf for dist.a.o to generate the
Content-Language
Blair Zajac wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 14:00:14 -0700:
> On 03/24/2012 01:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Blair Zajac wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 13:17:17 -0700:
>>> BTW, any chance of getting the new svnadmin verify work into 1.6.x? I
>>> was thinking it may be worth cutting .19 just to get t
On 03/24/2012 01:40 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
Blair Zajac wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 13:17:17 -0700:
BTW, any chance of getting the new svnadmin verify work into 1.6.x? I
was thinking it may be worth cutting .19 just to get that in as people
may want to easily know if they have an issue with
Blair Zajac wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 13:17:17 -0700:
> BTW, any chance of getting the new svnadmin verify work into 1.6.x? I
> was thinking it may be worth cutting .19 just to get that in as people
> may want to easily know if they have an issue with their repositories.
That work hasn't
On 03/24/2012 03:13 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
Since this is a 1.6.x release there are -dep tarballs
which should also be signed by those who test them.
I've run a test build with these dependencies on a Debian Linux system.
I ma
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 09:01:59AM -, julianf...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: julianfoad
> Date: Wed Mar 21 09:01:59 2012
> New Revision: 1303316
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1303316&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/tests/cmdline/svntest/sandbox.py
> (Sandbox.get_tempname): Fix a b
This revision turned merge_tests.py 127 into XPASS on
svn-slik-w2k3-x64-ra. It passes for me too in HEAD.
XPASS: merge_tests.py 127: reverse merge applies revs in reverse order
Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 19:38:49 -0400:
> On Mar 23, 2012 5:35 PM, wrote:
> >
> > Author: julianfoad
s...@apache.org wrote on Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 19:04:19 -:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Thu Mar 22 19:04:19 2012
> New Revision: 1303987
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1303987&view=rev
> Log:
> * tools/dist/dist.sh: Only clean contrib/ notes/ and packages/ if the
>release being made is
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 17:25:28 +0200:
> [[[
> FSFS: Eliminate the DAG API's NODE_POOL, step 1.
>
> This makes the dag_node_t struct track its own lifetime, rather than
> depend on callers to provide a convenient pool to allocate parts of
> itself in. Subsequent revisions wil
Done in r1304815
Daniel Shahaf wrote on Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 16:36:44 +0200:
> Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 22:46:43 -0400:
> > On Mar 23, 2012 7:16 PM, wrote:
> > >...
> > > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c Fri Mar 23 23:15:34
> > 2012
> > ...
> > > + if (kind ==
[[[
FSFS: Eliminate the DAG API's NODE_POOL, step 1.
This makes the dag_node_t struct track its own lifetime, rather than
depend on callers to provide a convenient pool to allocate parts of
itself in. Subsequent revisions will remove the now-unused POOL
parameter to get_node_revision() and update
Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 22:46:43 -0400:
> On Mar 23, 2012 7:16 PM, wrote:
> >...
> > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_fs_fs/tree.c Fri Mar 23 23:15:34
> 2012
> ...
> > + if (kind == svn_node_dir)
> > +{
> > + apr_hash_t *entries;
> > + apr_hash_index_t *hi;
>
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 03:54:13PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> Since this is a 1.6.x release there are -dep tarballs
> which should also be signed by those who test them.
> I've run a test build with these dependencies on a Debian Linux system.
I made a slight mistake by putting APR 1.4.6 into
15 matches
Mail list logo
