There was a discussion in April 2010 regarding the fix for issue 2753.
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2010-04/0277.shtml
Unfortunately the discussion died due to lack of other opinions. I think Mike
had some very important input here and I believe that this concluding statement
is incorrect:
-Original Message-
From: danie...@apache.org [mailto:danie...@apache.org]
Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2012 00:22
To: comm...@subversion.apache.org
Subject: svn commit: r1399462 - in /subversion/trunk:
subversion/libsvn_client/ subversion/libsvn_subr/ subversion/libsvn_wc/
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 3:31 PM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Thu Oct 18 11:31:20 2012
New Revision: 1399582
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1399582view=rev
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util_error.c: Include ra_serf.h which contains
prototypes for functions
Hi all,
Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD of
the repo to see if there are further corruptions/errors.
It would be helpful if --force switch would do this.
Attaching a patch and the log
-Original Message-
From: Prabhu Gnana Sundar [mailto:prabh...@collab.net]
Sent: donderdag 18 oktober 2012 17:05
To: dev@subversion.apache.org
Subject: [PATCH] Implement svnadmin verify --force
Hi all,
Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 08:35:03PM +0530, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
Hi all,
Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD
of the repo to see if there are further corruptions/errors.
It would be
Stefan Sperling wrote:
Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD
of the repo to see if there are further corruptions/errors.
It would be helpful if --force switch
Would it be useful to copy this explanation somewhere more discoverable --
somewhere in the source tree, or linked from the release notes page?
- Julian
Philip Martin wrote:
Johan Corveleyn jcor...@gmail.com writes:
With this new exclusive mode it's probably quite clear (no
I (Julian Foad) wrote:
Stefan Sperling wrote:
Hey Julian, are you still planning to rename these APIs from symmetric
to automatic merge? I think automatic is a much better term to use
because it is somewhat easier to understand from the user's perspective.
Especially for new users
Ivan Zhakov wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Thu Oct 18 11:31:20 2012
New Revision: 1399582
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1399582view=rev
Log:
* subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/util_error.c: Include ra_serf.h which contains
prototypes for functions implemented in this file.
[...]
On 17.10.2012 13:53, Stefan Küng wrote:
On 17.10.2012 18:20, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
Anyway, I was just wondering what folks feelings were about this
possibility, and whether it's finally time to start thinking about
proper regex support within Subversion.
I'm wondering: if C++ is an option,
Author: cmpilato
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398983view=rev
Log:
Reintegrate into trunk the 'http-dynamic-prop-namespaces' branch
(using a simple 'svn merge BRANCH-URL' with a trunk@HEAD client!).
Modified: subversion/trunk/subversion/mod_dav_svn/deadprops.c
+static
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:56:15 +0200:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Daniel Shahaf
d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
stef...@apache.org wrote on Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 21:34:22 -:
Author: stefan2
Date: Sun Jun 10 21:34:21 2012
New Revision: 1348666
Just added this comment to issue #1971[1] (aka certain property names cause
non-wf XML responses, aka the thing that spun cmpilato off on this
extensible property namespace business):
{{{
Oh, man. Maybe this whole venture was ill-conceived. I just remembered the
other restrictions on XML Names,
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:26:13 +0200:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 1:57 AM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
Branko Čibej wrote on Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 23:51:43 -0400:
On 15.10.2012 17:14, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote:
However, if you have a long-running process
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 02:26:13 +0200:
No need to go off on a hyperbole. Raise your
concerns in a factual way and hold off meta-
discussion until after those facts got confirmed.
Still appreciate the review, though. And, yes, the
coded logic may contain holes and I'm
Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:35:03 +0530:
Hi all,
Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD of
the repo to see if there are further corruptions/errors.
Why is
r=0
Fixed all in r1399466 and r1399860. Thanks for the review.
Bert Huijben wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 13:45:46 +0200:
+ SVN_ERR(svn_stream_close(lsbinfo));
if (err)
{
svn_error_clear(err);
This replaces one error leak by another one.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:35:03 +0530:
Hi all,
Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
error/corruption is found in the repo. It does not go till the HEAD of
Julian Foad wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 21:17:09 +0100:
Author: cmpilato
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1398983view=rev
Log:
Reintegrate into trunk the 'http-dynamic-prop-namespaces' branch
(using a simple 'svn merge BRANCH-URL' with a trunk@HEAD client!).
Modified:
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 23:20:45 +0200:
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Daniel Shahaf
d...@daniel.shahaf.namewrote:
Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 20:35:03 +0530:
Hi all,
Currently svnadmin verify would stop verification process once an
Regarding this issue: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3311
We don't support using --depth options other than infinity with
externals. Bert mentions that wc-ng should make it easier to
implement this.
However, given the way svn:externals can be defined I think that it's
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
Regarding this issue: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3311
We don't support using --depth options other than infinity with
externals. Bert mentions that wc-ng should make it easier to
implement this.
Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com writes:
Why is
r=0
HEAD=$(svnlook youngest $repos)
while [ $r -le $HEAD ]; do
svnadmin verify -r$r $repos
r=$(($r + 1))
done
not an option?
It will not report multiple issues with the same revision
(e.g. predecessor
Philip Martin wrote on Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 23:32:15 +0100:
Stefan Fuhrmann stefan.fuhrm...@wandisco.com writes:
Why is
r=0
HEAD=$(svnlook youngest $repos)
while [ $r -le $HEAD ]; do
svnadmin verify -r$r $repos
r=$(($r + 1))
done
not an option?
It will
Arfrever, Jaroslaw, Karol: you have been involved in po: pl translation
for Subversion. Can you look at Jakub's report here and fix whatever
needs to be fixed? (This is a fwd from http://bugs.debian.org/690815 .)
Thanks,
Peter
[Jakub Wilk]
po/pl.po has this message:
msgstr --- Łączenie
Sorry for the delay,
I have logged this in the issue tracker;
http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4248
It is Issue # 4248
Gavin.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name]
Sent: Tuesday, 16 October 2012 11:40
To: Raphael Kubo da Costa
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Ben Reser b...@reser.org wrote:
Regarding this issue: http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3311
We don't support using --depth options other than infinity with
externals. Bert mentions that wc-ng should make it easier to
implement this.
2012-10-19 00:45:28 Peter Samuelson napisał(a):
Arfrever, Jaroslaw, Karol: you have been involved in po: pl translation
for Subversion. Can you look at Jakub's report here and fix whatever
needs to be fixed? (This is a fwd from http://bugs.debian.org/690815 .)
Thanks,
Peter
[Jakub
29 matches
Mail list logo
