On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:24 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.netwrote:
Here's a question I've been wondering for some time: should we expose to
users a configuration option for declaring the number of aux connections
ra_serf should use? I mean, Firefox has exposed such an option for
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de wrote:
P.S. This thread was an unusually long one, for a patch that adds about
a dozen lines of code.
Uh, how is that at all unusual for this crowd? =) -- justin
Philip Martin wrote on Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 14:13:34 +:
Erez Zarum erezza...@gmail.com writes:
I am trying to create a master slave configuration with proxy requests
through the slave, i have used this configuration on the slave:
Location /
DAV
Daniel Shahaf danie...@elego.de writes:
Do you plan to work on this, or should I apply the patch I posted
elsethread?
I'm not working on it.
--
Certified Supported Apache Subversion Downloads:
http://www.wandisco.com/subversion/download
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Debian/wheezy)
Tested:
(local, svn, svn+sasl, serf, neon) x (fsfs, fsfs/pack/shard, bdb)
(serf/v1, neon/v1) x (fsfs, bdb)
swig-pl, swig-py, swig-rb
javahl x (fsfs, bdb)
Results:
All tests PASS
Local dependencies:
apache2-threaded-dev
Hi,
This patch uses an existing function(svn_ra_serf__context_run_wait)
instead of in-line code for processing the connections defined by the
serf context.
Attached the patch and log message.
Thanks Regards,
Vijayaguru
Index: subversion/libsvn_ra_serf/replay.c
On 12/13/2012 09:53 AM, vijay wrote:
Hi,
This patch uses an existing function(svn_ra_serf__context_run_wait) instead
of in-line code for processing the connections defined by the serf context.
Attached the patch and log message.
Looks good. I did some additional cleanup of comments made
The attached patch makes several changes to how we discover compilers
and set flags on *nix:
* Search for clang as well as the default gcc/cc, and prefer clang(++)
over gcc/g++.
* Set standards-compliance mode (C90/C++11) even without maintainer-mode.
* Add -pipe to C(XX)FLAGS if the
Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com writes:
{{{
* build/ac-macros/compiler.m4: New file.
(SVN_PROG_CC, SVN_CFLAGS_ADD_IFELSE,
SVN_PROG_CXX, SVN_CXXFLAGS_ADD_IFELSE): New.
* aclocal.m4: Include build/ac-macros/compiler.m4.
* configure.ac:
- Use SVN_PROG_CC instead of AC_PROG_CC
- Use
* Search for clang as well as the default gcc/cc, and prefer clang(++)
over gcc/g++.
Is clang considered superior, then? Fair enough, I haven't really kept
up.
* Add -pipe to C(XX)FLAGS if the compiler supports it. This speeds up
compilation a bit in my tests.
Hmm. It seems
Ben Reser wrote:
The 1.7.8 release artifacts are now available for testing/signing.
Summary:
+1 to release
Platform:
Linux (Ubuntu 11.10)
Tested:
[ bdb | fsfs ] x [ ra_local | ra_svn | ra_neon | ra_serf ]
swig-py
swig-pl
swig-rb
ctypes-python
javahl
Results:
All tests
On 12/13/2012 05:48 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:24 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
mailto:cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
Here's a question I've been wondering for some time: should we expose to
users a configuration option for declaring the number of
Mike,
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:06 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
On 12/13/2012 05:48 AM, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:24 PM, C. Michael Pilato cmpil...@collab.net
mailto:cmpil...@collab.net wrote:
Here's a question I've been wondering for some
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:40 AM, danie...@apache.org wrote:
Author: danielsh
Date: Thu Nov 15 05:40:40 2012
New Revision: 1409652
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1409652view=rev
Log:
Add a skeleton XFail test. There is no issue number yet, but the bug is being
discussed on users@.
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Paul Burba ptbu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Stefan Sperling s...@elego.de wrote:
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 06:00:52PM -0400, Paul Burba wrote:
These six XFailing upate tests are all part of this effort correct?
61XFAIL update locally
Per the 1.8 Release Status 'Test Review' item on the roadmap, we're in
pretty good shape (at least compared to where we were at a similar
time for 1.7). Here's where we stand re XFail and WIP tests that need
to be fixed before release:
Of all the XFailing tests *with* an associated issue, there
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
The attached patch makes several changes to how we discover compilers
and set flags on *nix:
* Search for clang as well as the default gcc/cc, and prefer clang(++)
over gcc/g++.
* Set standards-compliance mode
On 14.12.2012 02:32, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 1:13 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
The attached patch makes several changes to how we discover compilers
and set flags on *nix:
* Search for clang as well as the default gcc/cc, and prefer clang(++)
over
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Branko Čibej br...@wandisco.com wrote:
...
P.S.: Nothing wrong with Boost as such, of course; but including
boost/shared_ptr.hpp tends to pull in some 90% of Boost's headers, and
I consider that overkill.
I'll go on record with Boost is the Automake of C++.
On 14.12.2012 07:38, Miha Vitorovic wrote:
On 14.12.2012 4:21, Branko Čibej wrote:
The only reason for trying for C++11 is, as far as I'm concerned,
getting std::shared_ptr memory. The C++ bindings I'm slowly
wrapping my head around will need it, and I don't want to even
consider using
20 matches
Mail list logo
