Re: Bug in mailer.py

2013-02-18 Thread Peelman, Nick
While you're in there :) I was seeing a few more spam points than i liked, and a coupe of them were easy fixes: def mail_headers(self, group, params): from email import Utils subject = self.make_subject(group, params) try: subject.encode('ascii') except UnicodeError:

Re: Bug in mailer.py

2013-02-18 Thread olli hauer
On 2013-02-18 22:51, Daniel Shahaf wrote: > r1447513 fixes the bug you originally reported, Nick. > > Peelman, Nick wrote on Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 16:40:57 -0500: >> While you're in there :) >> >> I was seeing a few more spam points than i liked, and a coupe of them were >> easy fixes: >> >>de

Re: Bug in mailer.py

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Will this break any use-cases? (eg: do some people send commit mails to mailing lists configured to reject Precedence:bulk inbound mails?) Would it be better to allow the user to set arbitrary headers? Example UI for mailer.py.conf: [headers] Precedence: bulk X-SVN-Id: %(repos_basename

Re: exclusive WC locks by default? (was: Re: svn commit: r1447487 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/svn.c)

2013-02-18 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Feb 18, 2013 7:08 PM, "Stefan Sperling" wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:21:16PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote: > > If I would use 1.8 to run > > > > svn diff |more > > > > And leave that open in a console I would block TortoiseSVN, AnkhSVN, Subclipse, etc on my entire working copy, while this

Re: Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Julian Foad
I (Julian Foad) wrote: > Hi Mark.  I can reproduce the 'q'-doesn't-quit bug on Linux -- it > just moves on to the next conflict.  I wrote that and I'll investigate and > fix it if Stefan doesn't beat me to it. Revision 1447564 should fix that.  Thanks for reporting. - Julian > I can't reprod

exclusive WC locks by default? (was: Re: svn commit: r1447487 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/svn.c)

2013-02-18 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:21:16PM +0100, Bert Huijben wrote: > If I would use 1.8 to run > > svn diff |more > > And leave that open in a console I would block TortoiseSVN, AnkhSVN, > Subclipse, etc on my entire working copy, while this command doesn't even > obtain a working copy lock. > > An

Re: Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Julian Foad
Hi Mark.  I can reproduce the 'q'-doesn't-quit bug on Linux -- it just moves on to the next conflict.  I wrote that and I'll investigate and fix it if Stefan doesn't beat me to it. I can't reproduce the Enter-means-postone bug.  For me, hitting Enter just repeats the prompt (which I understand

Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1447108 compiled Feb 18 2013, 00:21:45 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2013-02-18 Thread Julian Foad
This discussion isn't about 'svnbench' any more.  Please set an appropriate subject line to give everyone a fair chance to read it.  (For example, I habitually delete 'svnbench' emails without reading them, but I happened to look at this one.) - Julian   -- Certified & Supported Apache Subver

Re: Bug in mailer.py

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Shahaf
r1447513 fixes the bug you originally reported, Nick. Peelman, Nick wrote on Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 16:40:57 -0500: > While you're in there :) > > I was seeing a few more spam points than i liked, and a coupe of them were > easy fixes: > >def mail_headers(self, group, params): Can you send t

Re: Bug in mailer.py

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Agreed. This was introduced in r1439592. You can use r1439591 for now; I'll commit your fix shortly. Thanks! Peelman, Nick wrote on Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 15:55:40 -0500: > Using mailer.py fetched from: > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/subversion/trunk/tools/hook-scripts/mailer/ > > Running: >

Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1447108 compiled Feb 18 2013, 00:21:45 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2013-02-18 Thread Ivan Zhakov
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Bert Huijben wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of >> Philip Martin >> Sent: maandag 18 februari 2013 17:01 >> To: Neels Hofmeyr >> Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [svnbench] Re

RE: svn commit: r1447487 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/svn.c

2013-02-18 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: rhuij...@apache.org [mailto:rhuij...@apache.org] > Sent: maandag 18 februari 2013 21:51 > To: comm...@subversion.apache.org > Subject: svn commit: r1447487 - /subversion/trunk/subversion/svn/svn.c > > Author: rhuijben > Date: Mon Feb 18 20:51:15 2013 > New Re

RE: [svnbench] Revision: 1447108 compiled Feb 18 2013, 00:21:45 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2013-02-18 Thread Bert Huijben
> -Original Message- > From: MARTIN PHILIP [mailto:codematt...@ntlworld.com] On Behalf Of > Philip Martin > Sent: maandag 18 februari 2013 17:01 > To: Neels Hofmeyr > Cc: dev@subversion.apache.org > Subject: Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1447108 compiled Feb 18 2013, 00:21:45 on > x86_64-unkno

Re: mailing list issues and the silly error in the build system doc thread

2013-02-18 Thread Branko Čibej
On 18.02.2013 21:21, Gabriela Gibson wrote: > Hi, > > it seems that the mailing list is not mailing me a copy of threads I > start, so it's not easy to add a correction if I have made a mistake, > unless someone posts first so I can answer. Don't blame the mailing list server, blame Google, which

mailing list issues and the silly error in the build system doc thread

2013-02-18 Thread Gabriela Gibson
Hi, it seems that the mailing list is not mailing me a copy of threads I start, so it's not easy to add a correction if I have made a mistake, unless someone posts first so I can answer. Would it be possible to change this? Alas, it looks like there is always at least one error hiding -- in

Re: Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Philip Martin
Mark Phippard writes: > My "trunk" working copy had the WC upgraded by running the JavaHL test > suite. I can live with it, but it means I have to change PATH before > updating my WC. I've been doing this for a long time now, but for > some reason sometimes I get weird results. For example, I

Re: Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Typing 'enter' also postpones here. > But answering 'q' works for me before and after r1447398, on OpenBSD. > (Except that typing backspace doesn't erase characters at the prompt :-( ) > > Which platform are you on? Windows? > Is it possi

RE: [svnbench] Revision: 1447108 compiled Feb 18 2013, 00:21:45

2013-02-18 Thread Bert Huijben
on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hmm. I wouldn't expect libsvn client to affect a config that is managed by applications and which might live for weeks in gui clients. svn_client_context_t and svn_wc_config_t

Re: Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > Typing 'enter' also postpones here. > But answering 'q' works for me before and after r1447398, on OpenBSD. > (Except that typing backspace doesn't erase characters at the prompt :-( ) > > Which platform are you on? Windows? > Is it poss

Re: Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:32:09PM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:02:40PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:50:51AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: > >> > I just did a merge using current

Re: Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Phippard
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:18 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:02:40PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:50:51AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: >> > I just did a merge using current trunk. There were a lot of text and >> > tree conflicts. I noticed i

Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1447108 compiled Feb 18 2013, 00:21:45 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2013-02-18 Thread Philip Martin
Philip Martin writes: > Neels Hofmeyr writes: > >> On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:55:07 + >> ne...@apache.org wrote: >> >>> Charts of this data are available at >>> http://svn-qavm.apache.org/charts/ >> >> Looking at >> >> http://svn-qavm.apache.org/charts/compare_1.7.0_tr...@last12.svg >> >> I noti

Re: Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 06:02:40PM +0100, Stefan Sperling wrote: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:50:51AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: > > I just did a merge using current trunk. There were a lot of text and > > tree conflicts. I noticed it does not start resolving them until the > > end now, which is

Re: Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Stefan Sperling
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:50:51AM -0500, Mark Phippard wrote: > I just did a merge using current trunk. There were a lot of text and > tree conflicts. I noticed it does not start resolving them until the > end now, which is expected. However, one thing I could not do was > postpone all conflict

Re: FSFS format7 status and first results

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Phippard
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Stefan Fuhrmann wrote: > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Mark Phippard wrote: >> >> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Stefan Fuhrmann >> wrote: >> > Hey all, >> > >> > Just to give you an update on what is going on that branch, >> > here a few facts and numbers.

Resolving conflicts during merge - could not postpone all

2013-02-18 Thread Mark Phippard
I just did a merge using current trunk. There were a lot of text and tree conflicts. I noticed it does not start resolving them until the end now, which is expected. However, one thing I could not do was postpone all conflicts. I used the 's' option and saw that option 'q' is supposed to do thi

Re: Permission to translate your page at http://subversion.apache.org/

2013-02-18 Thread Branko Čibej
On 18.02.2013 16:47, Anja Skrba wrote: > I would be grateful if you could allow me to translate your writing > into Serbo-Croatian language, that is used in all Former Yugoslav > Republics and to post it on my website. Hopefully, it will help our > people to gather some additional knowledge about c

Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1447108 compiled Feb 18 2013, 00:21:45 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2013-02-18 Thread Philip Martin
Neels Hofmeyr writes: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:55:07 + > ne...@apache.org wrote: > >> Charts of this data are available at >> http://svn-qavm.apache.org/charts/ > > Looking at > > http://svn-qavm.apache.org/charts/compare_1.7.0_tr...@last12.svg > > I notice that somewhere between r1439212 and

Re: [svnbench] Revision: 1447108 compiled Feb 18 2013, 00:21:45 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu

2013-02-18 Thread Neels Hofmeyr
On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 00:55:07 + ne...@apache.org wrote: > Charts of this data are available at > http://svn-qavm.apache.org/charts/ Looking at http://svn-qavm.apache.org/charts/compare_1.7.0_tr...@last12.svg I notice that somewhere between r1439212 and r1441993, 'update' got a lot slower. Th

Re: FSFS format7 status and first results

2013-02-18 Thread Daniel Shahaf
Stefan Fuhrmann wrote on Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 10:52:21 +0100: > Hey all, > > Just to give you an update on what is going on that branch, > here a few facts and numbers. Bottom line is that there is > still a lot to do but the basic assumptions proved correct and > significant benefits can already

[RFC] Build System Documentation

2013-02-18 Thread Gabriela Gibson
I've written up some documentation about the build system, could I please have some feedback as to usefulness, style, shape etc? thanks, Gabriela --- The Subversion Build System, an overview --

Re: BDB vs FSFS - OMG!

2013-02-18 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Philip Martin > wrote: > >> Stefan Fuhrmann writes: >> >> > Apache configuration (~1GB cache, mpm-worker): >> > >> > SVNInMemoryCacheSize 100 >> > SVNCacheFullTexts On >> > SVNCacheTextDeltas On >> > SVNCacheRevProps On >> >

Re: BDB vs FSFS - OMG!

2013-02-18 Thread Stefan Fuhrmann
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Philip Martin wrote: > Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > > > Apache configuration (~1GB cache, mpm-worker): > > > > SVNInMemoryCacheSize 100 > > SVNCacheFullTexts On > > SVNCacheTextDeltas On > > SVNCacheRevProps On > > SVNCompressionLevel 0 > > I see no me

Re: BDB vs FSFS - OMG!

2013-02-18 Thread Philip Martin
Stefan Fuhrmann writes: > Apache configuration (~1GB cache, mpm-worker): > > SVNInMemoryCacheSize 100 > SVNCacheFullTexts On > SVNCacheTextDeltas On > SVNCacheRevProps On > SVNCompressionLevel 0 I see no mention of tuning the BDB repository. There are several things you can tweak